Brodie seemed to slowed to a walk this season. Despite his good numbers, I wonder if he is. really an NHL Dman next season.

I'd have to think the front office values Bahl more highly than that

Wennberg is under 47% faceoffs, and really was a nothingburger for the Rangers. Was his line bad? Yes, Roslovic and KK were not good too, butI just don't know if I'd want to go three years with him,

I'd rather Haula be 3C and go get a cheaper 4C like Stenlund who is over 53% on faceoffs and brings size.

I have never really bought into goalie analytics, but the data case for Stolarz is not enticing. His expected save % and goals against average suggest there may have been some puck luck there (and would say that Kahkonen may have been better last year).

(It’s goalie data, so take it with grain of salt)

I think Stolarz is probably the best FA wise. I don’t think I’d necessarily be mad at signing him because he always just become the next backup once Allen expires but all that said, I think Fitz knows he needs to go for a big name and not cop out on the goaltending this year

I think Wennberg would be a really good defensive forward which was what I was sort of aiming for in the 3rd line. Stenlund wouldn’t be a bad pickup but I’m not sure he is a true 3rd line player.

He didn’t have a great year and I have to think the team wants another top4 LD for next season. I don’t think it’d be a bad move keeping Bahl but I also don’t see him capping out as more than a 6D. Maybe Keene will get more out of him.

Yeah, definitely some serious risk but at worst instead of being their 4th or 5th dman, he’s there 6th. Toronto didn’t really have any thing better which is why he played so much with them.

I'm saying I'd rather have Haula at 3C, Stenlund 4C.