SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Bruins Big Trade

Créé par: PattyOSnipes
Équipe: 2024-25 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 23 mai 2024
Publié: 29 mai 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
87 700 000 $
21 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 500 000 $
78 000 000 $
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2025
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2026
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2287 700 000 $84 590 834 $50 000 $330 000 $3 109 166 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
11 250 000 $11 250 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
870 000 $870 000 $ (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
787 500 $787 500 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG
NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 700 000 $7 700 000 $
G
RFA
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $$250K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
G
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
29 mai à 11 h 7
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 20,244
Mentions "j'aime": 9,042
Ullmark is not going to Ottawa. NTC. He would have been there last offseason if he was willing.
29 mai à 11 h 32
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 5,531
Mentions "j'aime": 1,857
Modifié 29 mai à 11 h 47
Quoting: Gofnut999
Ullmark is not going to Ottawa. NTC. He would have been there last offseason if he was willing.


Curious to see if a long extension with NMC provisions would make him reconsider. NJ and Ottawa are both young, talented teams arguably,

I don’t believe it is likely, but an extension that parlays his current value into a long term home might be just as appealing as another east coast outlet without an extension.
StutzlesNumber1Fan a aimé ceci.
29 mai à 11 h 41
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 2,477
Mentions "j'aime": 1,458
Quoting: Gofnut999
Ullmark is not going to Ottawa. NTC. He would have been there last offseason if he was willing.


not that I'm convinced that Ullmark would waive for Ottawa or anything, but is there any actual knowledge that he's demonstrated any unwillingness? the rumoured vetoed trade deadline deal was to LA for "geographical reasons", was it not?
StutzlesNumber1Fan et athrin a aimé ceci.
29 mai à 11 h 51
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 5,531
Mentions "j'aime": 1,857
My assumption is atleast a couple of those Ottawa fourth round picks would be coming to Boston. If they were willing to fully retain on Forsberg, I could see him going to Boston as well
29 mai à 12 h 43
#5
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 22,895
Mentions "j'aime": 7,465
we got two big problems here:
1. of course ullmark isn't waiving for ottawa
2. This wouldn't have been an issue a couple months ago, but now I'm not so sure that Chychrun is better than Lohrei. I don't think Chychrun to boston makes any sense anymore.
bruins27 a aimé ceci.
29 mai à 13 h 3
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 20,244
Mentions "j'aime": 9,042
Quoting: emoprettyboy
not that I'm convinced that Ullmark would waive for Ottawa or anything, but is there any actual knowledge that he's demonstrated any unwillingness? the rumoured vetoed trade deadline deal was to LA for "geographical reasons", was it not?


That was at the deadline. Last offseason there was mutual interest, Sens had plenty of pieces that could facilitate the trade, desperately needed a goalie, B’s wanted that cap space. Take 3 guesses why it did not happen. Sens had to settle for free agency and made a bad choice there. Unfortunate for both teams.
29 mai à 13 h 34
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 850
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Quoting: Gofnut999
That was at the deadline. Last offseason there was mutual interest, Sens had plenty of pieces that could facilitate the trade, desperately needed a goalie, B’s wanted that cap space. Take 3 guesses why it did not happen. Sens had to settle for free agency and made a bad choice there. Unfortunate for both teams.


so they we have to establish which teams out west he'd agree to. if he's got a 15 team no trade list and Canadian teams are on it that means 3 from the Atlantic are a NO which means there's midwest-west teams he'd say yes to or hasn't blocked.
29 mai à 14 h 0
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 20,244
Mentions "j'aime": 9,042
Quoting: Bruins_Guy613
so they we have to establish which teams out west he'd agree to. if he's got a 15 team no trade list and Canadian teams are on it that means 3 from the Atlantic are a NO which means there's midwest-west teams he'd say yes to or hasn't blocked.


The overall consensus is his current 16 team list which is in affect until July 1st is - the entire Pacific Division, rest of Canada, Zona/Utah, Colorado, Columbus, random 16th nobody agrees on.

On July 1st with one year remaining under contract if he wants as much control as possible, he takes teams like Vegas, Winnipeg, Seattle off his list and adds teams like NJ, Detroit, Chicago? Which leaves almost everyone on his available list, not in need or not in position to. In essence he’d almost be in complete control…if he wants 🤷🏻‍♂️
29 mai à 18 h 2
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 2,477
Mentions "j'aime": 1,458
Quoting: Gofnut999
That was at the deadline. Last offseason there was mutual interest, Sens had plenty of pieces that could facilitate the trade, desperately needed a goalie, B’s wanted that cap space. Take 3 guesses why it did not happen. Sens had to settle for free agency and made a bad choice there. Unfortunate for both teams.

I mean these are all assumptions. reasonable assumptions, sure. but let’s not act like these are facts
29 mai à 18 h 6
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 20,244
Mentions "j'aime": 9,042
Quoting: emoprettyboy
I mean these are all assumptions. reasonable assumptions, sure. but let’s not act like these are facts


Except they are. 😉
29 mai à 18 h 6
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 2,477
Mentions "j'aime": 1,458
Quoting: Gofnut999
Except they are. 😉


blah blah blah
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage