SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Have To

Créé par: Bruins1054_gmb
Équipe: 2024-25 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 20 mai 2024
Publié: 20 mai 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Gotta pay to get Lindholm.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1775 000 $
2775 000 $
1775 000 $
1775 000 $
1775 000 $
1775 000 $
87 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
68 000 000 $
22 125 000 $
35 500 000 $
33 200 000 $
1775 000 $
Transactions
1.
BOS
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (BOS)
2.
BOS
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (DET)
Détails additionnels:
Top 15 Protected
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2025
Logo de BOS
Logo de DET
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2026
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2387 700 000 $87 479 167 $50 000 $542 500 $220 833 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
11 250 000 $11 250 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
870 000 $870 000 $ (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 125 000 $2 125 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
787 500 $787 500 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
775 000 $775 000 $
C
UFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $$250K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
G
RFA
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG
NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
G
UFA - 1
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
20 mai à 11 h 23
#1
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 22,924
Mentions "j'aime": 7,466
have to? this is horrible. Geekie for a second? what on earth are yo thinking? with the exception of signing swayman, i think every move here is horrendous.
20 mai à 11 h 25
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2024
Messages: 961
Mentions "j'aime": 480
We’re not giving our 1st for a 31 year old goalie with 1 year left lol.

Especially when Cossa is likely in the NHL in 25-26.
20 mai à 11 h 34
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2024
Messages: 61
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Not sure that adding old and slow players like Toffoli and Dillon makes the Bruins better. That $9 million could be better spent. I liked those guys for this team maybe three or four years ago.
Bruins1054_gmb a aimé ceci.
20 mai à 11 h 36
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 5,577
Mentions "j'aime": 1,878
Quoting: DanielSan92
We’re not giving our 1st for a 31 year old goalie with 1 year left lol.

Especially when Cossa is likely in the NHL in 25-26.


For a 2025 first, Jersey is the more likely option. That said, playing a rookie as your #1 would be a wonderful thing for the rest of the Atlantic. Rookie goaltenders are rarely ready. Developing him as your backup is probably the best case scenario.

Ullmark fits, but my guess is it would be for a defender and a 2024 second round pick. You can’t play all your prospects. Opportunities will eventually dry out and contending teams don’t have all youth backends. Leveraging a secondary one to upgrade that position is probably a smart thing to do. There comes a point where young teams need to bring in veteran stabilizing presences. I believe Detroit is at that point
20 mai à 11 h 38
#5
Démarrer sujet
DiscouragedBruinsFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 1,303
Mentions "j'aime": 516
Quoting: DFence
Not sure that adding old and slow players like Toffoli and Dillon makes the Bruins better. That $9 million could be better spent. I liked those guys for this team maybe three or four years ago.


That's fair. I like Dillon as a shutdown guy who doesn't block Lohrei from the top 4. Toffoli is just a goal scorer which is what I was looking for. I think you're right about getting more speed for that kind of money, though.
SJSF a aimé ceci.
20 mai à 11 h 41
#6
Démarrer sujet
DiscouragedBruinsFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 1,303
Mentions "j'aime": 516
Quoting: DanielSan92
We’re not giving our 1st for a 31 year old goalie with 1 year left lol.

Especially when Cossa is likely in the NHL in 25-26.


It's top 15 protected in the 2025 draft. Goalies take awhile to develop at the NHL level. Not a fit, fine. Just trying something different than Ullmark to NJ that's been done a million times.
20 mai à 11 h 50
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2024
Messages: 961
Mentions "j'aime": 480
Quoting: Celtics21
For a 2025 first, Jersey is the more likely option. That said, playing a rookie as your #1 would be a wonderful thing for the rest of the Atlantic. Rookie goaltenders are rarely ready. Developing him as your backup is probably the best case scenario.

Ullmark fits, but my guess is it would be for a defender and a 2024 second round pick. You can’t play all your prospects. Opportunities will eventually dry out and contending teams don’t have all youth backends. Leveraging a secondary one to upgrade that position is probably a smart thing to do. There comes a point where young teams need to bring in veteran stabilizing presences. I believe Detroit is at that point


I agree on not throwing Cossa in as the starter. That said, the net is inevitably going to Cossa/Augustine in the coming years, barring drastic derailment in their development. (Which is always a possibility, especially with goalies) Ullmark is likely going to want money and term next summer.

Yzerman wouldn’t give term to Debrincat. He’s definitely not giving money and term to a goalie who would likely be the backup 2 years after the contract starts.
20 mai à 11 h 53
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2024
Messages: 961
Mentions "j'aime": 480
Quoting: Bruins1054_gmb
It's top 15 protected in the 2025 draft. Goalies take awhile to develop at the NHL level. Not a fit, fine. Just trying something different than Ullmark to NJ that's been done a million times.


I’m not a fan of rushing goalies, but Cossa is going into his D+4. He likely gets a few looks this year and shares the net next year.
20 mai à 11 h 57
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 5,577
Mentions "j'aime": 1,878
Quoting: DanielSan92
I agree on not throwing Cossa in as the starter. That said, the net is inevitably going to Cossa/Augustine in the coming years, barring drastic derailment in their development. (Which is always a possibility, especially with goalies) Ullmark is likely going to want money and term next summer.

Yzerman wouldn’t give term to Debrincat. He’s definitely not giving money and term to a goalie who would likely be the backup 2 years after the contract starts.


Let’s be candid. Augustine had a solid year at Michigan State, but isn’t the dominant goalie you’d expect for a top prospect. Cossa was middle of the pack as far as AhL goalies.

I agree that one of them should be your goaltender of the future, but betting on a 100% success rate on goalie prospects is a pretty flippant way to build a roster. The likelihood that one isn’t an NHL goalie is probably higher than both developing into solid starter types.

There is a viable argument about whether Detroit is good enough to spend capital now on a goaltender, but you’ve made a lot of acquisitions that suggests your GM knows age diversity on a roster is a need
20 mai à 12 h 1
#10
Démarrer sujet
DiscouragedBruinsFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 1,303
Mentions "j'aime": 516
Quoting: Bcarlo25
have to? this is horrible. Geekie for a second? what on earth are yo thinking? with the exception of signing swayman, i think every move here is horrendous.


Ross Colton netted a 2nd. It's not an unprecedented trade. WSH lacks scoring and has a plethora of 2nds. Might be optimistic for Geekie, but it's a chance to sell high on a player.
I don't like Lindholm at $8M, but I'd rather overpay for a top C than run it back with Coyle/Zacha.
20 mai à 12 h 11
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2024
Messages: 961
Mentions "j'aime": 480
Quoting: Celtics21
Let’s be candid. Augustine had a solid year at Michigan State, but isn’t the dominant goalie you’d expect for a top prospect. Cossa was middle of the pack as far as AhL goalies.

I agree that one of them should be your goaltender of the future, but betting on a 100% success rate on goalie prospects is a pretty flippant way to build a roster. The likelihood that one isn’t an NHL goalie is probably higher than both developing into solid starter types.

There is a viable argument about whether Detroit is good enough to spend capital now on a goaltender, but you’ve made a lot of acquisitions that suggests your GM knows age diversity on a roster is a need


Im the last one to trust a goalie prospect because outside the league’s Top 5 consistent elite, they’re wishy washy.

But you can’t look at Augustine’s year in MSU, the WJCs, and the WCs and claim he’s not a high end goalie prospect at this point

Is he the Askarov/Wallstedt/Cossa/Wolf level? No. He’s probably in the tier below them, though.
20 mai à 12 h 17
#12
Skip skibbity
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 2,742
Mentions "j'aime": 1,061
Quoting: Bruins1054_gmb
Ross Colton netted a 2nd. It's not an unprecedented trade. WSH lacks scoring and has a plethora of 2nds. Might be optimistic for Geekie, but it's a chance to sell high on a player.
I don't like Lindholm at $8M, but I'd rather overpay for a top C than run it back with Coyle/Zacha.


We'll pass in DC, thanks
20 mai à 12 h 18
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 5,577
Mentions "j'aime": 1,878
Quoting: DanielSan92
Im the last one to trust a goalie prospect because outside the league’s Top 5 consistent elite, they’re wishy washy.

But you can’t look at Augustine’s year in MSU, the WJCs, and the WCs and claim he’s not a high end goalie prospect at this point

Is he the Askarov/Wallstedt/Cossa/Wolf level? No. He’s probably in the tier below them, though.


I question the level you mentioned as above him. Prospects are fickle and the fail rate is high even among the premier guys, it’s why I would never do what Buffalo did to Levi. UPL seems to have recovered from poor handling earlier in his career.

I can look at Augustine and say he’s the best we had in our junior system at the time. He was arguably the second or even third best goalie in the Big 10. Not a rip on him. Just an acknowledgement that there is work to be done and where he is at in the developmental cycle. He is absolutely a real prospect with a good pedigree. He was a worthwhile second round pick. How many second rounders consistently stay in tbe NHL? I’m all for you being excited, but a prospect isn’t proven until they are
20 mai à 12 h 23
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2024
Messages: 961
Mentions "j'aime": 480
Quoting: Celtics21
I question the level you mentioned as above him. Prospects are fickle and the fail rate is high even among the premier guys, it’s why I would never do what Buffalo did to Levi. UPL seems to have recovered from poor handling earlier in his career.

I can look at Augustine and say he’s the best we had in our junior system at the time. He was arguably the second or even third best goalie in the Big 10. Not a rip on him. Just an acknowledgement that there is work to be done and where he is at in the developmental cycle. He is absolutely a real prospect with a good pedigree. He was a worthwhile second round pick. How many second rounders consistently stay in tbe NHL? I’m all for you being excited, but a prospect isn’t proven until they are


By "What Buffalo did to Levi" I assume you mean rush him to the NHL... Which likely isn't going to be a problem considering Cossa is way ahead of Augustine in his development.
20 mai à 12 h 25
#15
Buffbry
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 9,568
Mentions "j'aime": 5,660
Wings gonna pass at this price
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage