SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

An Outsiders Vision - ANA

Créé par: SupremeBone
Équipe: 2024-25 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 1 mai 2024
Publié: 4 mai 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 000 000 $
2775 000 $
2775 000 $
1775 000 $
31 300 000 $
11 300 000 $
1900 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1775 000 $
33 333 333 $
26 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Faksa, Radek
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2025 (DAL)
Détails additionnels:
ANA adds a quality 4C to use to shelter its youthful C group
DAL
    DAL makes the trade to free up the cap space it'll need
    2.
    ANA
      Not going to try to propose a deal here, but I'm curious about what peoples' thoughts would be on a trade built around Zegras for Necas?
      CAR
        CAR gets an infusion of flashier skill and some cost certainty while ANA gets a right-shooting skilled forward to partner with one (or two) of McTavish, Carlsson, or Gauthier for the long term.
        Rachats de contrats
        Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
        2024
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de EDM
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de BOS
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de PIT
        Logo de SJS
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de ANA
        2025
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de TOR
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de EDM
        Logo de DAL
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de ANA
        2026
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de ANA
        TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
        2387 500 000 $68 552 500 $0 $7 500 000 $18 947 500 $
        Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
        C, AG
        RFA - 2
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
        C, AG
        RFA - 1
        6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
        AD, AG
        UFA
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        3 650 000 $3 650 000 $
        AG, AD
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 250 000 $$3M)
        C
        RFA - 2
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
        AD
        UFA - 6
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
        AD, AG
        NTC
        UFA - 3
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance950 000 $$950K)
        AG, C
        RFA - 2
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
        AD, C
        UFA - 3
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
        AG, AD
        RFA
        Logo de Stars de Dallas
        3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
        C, AG
        M-NTC
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
        AD
        RFA
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        775 000 $775 000 $
        AG, AD
        RFA
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        775 000 $775 000 $
        C
        RFA
        Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
        DG/DD
        M-NTC
        UFA - 2
        3 333 333 $3 333 333 $
        DD
        UFA
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
        G
        M-NTC
        UFA - 3
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance800 000 $$800K)
        DG
        RFA - 2
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
        DD
        M-NTC
        UFA - 2
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        812 500 $812 500 $
        G
        RFA - 1
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        844 167 $844 167 $
        DG
        RFA - 2
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
        DD
        RFA
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        900 000 $900 000 $
        DG/DD
        RFA
        Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
        AG, AD
        UFA - 1

        Code d'intégration

        • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
        • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

        Texte intégré

        Cliquer pour surligner
        4 mai à 9 h 8
        #1
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juin 2016
        Messages: 2,943
        Mentions "j'aime": 1,967
        Modifié 4 mai à 10 h 15
        Necas for Z doesn’t make sense for ANA. Fill a hole on RW by opening one at LW with someone who also fills in really well at C whenever McT or Leo are injured. Necas is an absolute steal on his current deal, but will almost certainly be overpaid starting next year for the duration of his new contract. He has solid production, but all his advanced stats are very concerning. Im out on him for ANA, but totally the right move for CAR to shop him

        Any top 6 RW on a 2 year deal is a good add. Thats the perfect amount of term for ANA

        We could really use a better RD than Chat though. Roy from LA is my preference rn

        On the RFAs let Grouxl walk. Possibly Jones. Lacombe costs more. And though I like Vaak, the team did seem to prefer Lindstrom

        Positionally Gauthier on the wing with Leo is my guess
        GeneralLandro et SupremeBone a aimé ceci.
        4 mai à 9 h 56
        #2
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juin 2020
        Messages: 9,559
        Mentions "j'aime": 3,045
        Zegras is a worse fit for the canes than necas. Zegras’ no defense approach is a no go for the Canes
        4 mai à 10 h 3
        #3
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juin 2021
        Messages: 16,065
        Mentions "j'aime": 12,365
        Quoting: ecupirate07
        Zegras is a worse fit for the canes than necas. Zegras’ no defense approach is a no go for the Canes


        Much better defensively that Necas
        4 mai à 10 h 3
        #4
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juin 2021
        Messages: 16,065
        Mentions "j'aime": 12,365
        I am not saying Necas is like Dubois but I will say I think the scenario might be the exact same — he will be to expensive to trade for and then he will also be to expensive to resign. I don’t think either of those will match the production

        Faksa could be interesting but I think I’d rather just resign Isac Lundeström to play 4C

        Chatfield is not a top pairing defenseman, at all

        The left side on defense is going to be super interesting imo
        SupremeBone a aimé ceci.
        4 mai à 10 h 4
        #5
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juin 2020
        Messages: 9,559
        Mentions "j'aime": 3,045
        Quoting: GeneralLandro
        Much better defensively that Necas


        In what way?
        4 mai à 10 h 40
        #6
        Démarrer sujet
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juill. 2020
        Messages: 2,564
        Mentions "j'aime": 1,674
        Quoting: Jded
        Necas for Z doesn’t make sense for ANA. Fill a hole on RW by opening one at LW with someone who also fills in really well at C whenever McT or Leo are injured. Necas is an absolute steal on his current deal, but will almost certainly be overpaid starting next year for the duration of his new contract. He has solid production, but all his advanced stats are very concerning. Im out on him for ANA, but totally the right move for CAR to shop him

        Any top 6 RW on a 2 year deal is a good add. Thats the perfect amount of term for ANA

        We could really use a better RD than Chat though. Roy from LA is my preference rn

        On the RFAs let Grouxl walk. Possibly Jones. Lacombe costs more. And though I like Vaak, the team did seem to prefer Lindstrom

        Positionally Gauthier on the wing with Leo is my guess

        Quoting: GeneralLandro
        I am not saying Necas is like Dubois but I will say I think the scenario might be the exact same — he will be to expensive to trade for and then he will also be to expensive to resign. I don’t think either of those will match the production

        Faksa could be interesting but I think I’d rather just resign Isac Lundeström to play 4C

        Chatfield is not a top pairing defenseman, at all

        The left side on defense is going to be super interesting imo

        Fair enough on Necas. I just figured ANA was really looking for another R-shot forward for the long-term.

        I agree that a better RD than Chat would be ideal but my scenario already has the best of the UFA crop going elsewhere. As I think ANA is still a couple years from competing, they'll likely have to settle for a less-than-ideal fill-in for a few years and I chose among the better ones left that would likely be interested in the opportunity for ice time in ANA.

        I liked Faksa for the spot because I think be relatively in-demand (as far as cap dumps go) and would open up deployment options for their youth.

        I'll keep the rest in mind in future iterations smile
        GeneralLandro et Jded a aimé ceci.
        4 mai à 10 h 41
        #7
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: mai 2018
        Messages: 20,197
        Mentions "j'aime": 5,130
        Quoting: GeneralLandro
        Much better defensively that Necas


        Necas is replacement level defensively. Zegras is below replacement level. They both suck defensively, but Necas sucks less
        4 mai à 14 h 12
        #8
        Future Ducks legend
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juin 2022
        Messages: 10,348
        Mentions "j'aime": 7,137
        Quoting: SupremeBone
        Fair enough on Necas. I just figured ANA was really looking for another R-shot forward for the long-term.

        I agree that a better RD than Chat would be ideal but my scenario already has the best of the UFA crop going elsewhere. As I think ANA is still a couple years from competing, they'll likely have to settle for a less-than-ideal fill-in for a few years and I chose among the better ones left that would likely be interested in the opportunity for ice time in ANA.

        I liked Faksa for the spot because I think be relatively in-demand (as far as cap dumps go) and would open up deployment options for their youth.

        I'll keep the rest in mind in future iterations smile


        I like picking up Faksa as a 4C, I've proposed the idea a few times (though I sent McGinn the other way, he's slightly cheaper than faksa so still a cap savings)

        As far as Zegras for Necas, Zegras is the far superior player when looking at advanced stats, leading me to believe Necas' production is a result of his current settings, not his own ability. He's a complimentary player who's fast enough to be in the right place at the right time, and he's no better defensively than Zegras, after this season, id argue he's actually worse.
        4 mai à 14 h 13
        #9
        Future Ducks legend
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juin 2022
        Messages: 10,348
        Mentions "j'aime": 7,137
        Quoting: ecupirate07
        In what way?


        Go read advanced stats on the two of them.
         
        Répondre
        To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
        Question:
        Options:
        Ajouter une option
        Soumettre le sondage