Brother

Add a first and Carlo

rentals don't go for anything close to that.

this is a weird concept, that i don't think makes sense for either party, but no - a rental isn't getting carlo, poitras, ullmark, and two firsts. that's utterly absurd.

Lmao absolutely not, whether Drai is a rental or not isn't Edmontons problem.

Price starts at Swayman (not Ullmark but Swayman, he's younger, better and would actually come to Edmonton), Carlo, Poitras and whatever other capital you got to fill the rest.

This package wouldn't even grab Bouchard in all honesty

It's Leon Draisaitl. There would be an extension in place. He could get that much, or just about.

Assumed Ullmark and Draisaitl are extended

Oilers don't need Ullmark, and doubt if Ullmark waives either.

then why not just say that?


players get traded without extensions WAY more than they do with extensions. still, guys don't get that much on the trade market. sheesh, are we already forgetting last deadline? usually it takes longer. every guy that could be traded is all hyped up to get multiple firsts and roster players and prospects. they never do. what's the comp here? Karlsson?

The 'McAvoy or nah' protocol remains in effect

Draisaitl isn’t being traded. Looking forward to him signing, so the nonsense stops. Also, suggesting the Oilers don’t need Ullmark seems like an adverse position to the trade return as opposed to reality.