SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Do it

Créé par: Theozler
Équipe: 2024-25 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 25 avr. 2024
Publié: 25 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 000 000 $
32 750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
45 000 000 $
64 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Zegras, Trevor
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
ANA
  1. Marner, Mitchell
Détails additionnels:
Extension in place
2.
NSH
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de NSH
Logo de VAN
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2026
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2387 500 000 $84 898 334 $0 $0 $2 601 666 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
13 250 000 $13 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 500 000 $11 500 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
RFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 6
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Predators de Nashville
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
RFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
766 667 $766 667 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
856 667 $856 667 $
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
875 000 $875 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
25 avr. à 12 h 54
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,760
Mentions "j'aime": 1,793
You can’t do a sign and trade anymore. ANA isn’t trading Z for an expiring UFA
GeneralLandro et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
25 avr. à 13 h 3
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,575
Mentions "j'aime": 11,958
Anaheim is going to pass

Can’t see Verbeek wanting to spend like 13+ million on Marner nor should we
OldNYIfan et Jded a aimé ceci.
25 avr. à 13 h 37
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 843
Mentions "j'aime": 440
NSH declines. NSH is going to likely want a piece back instead of just picks, especially late 1sts. NSH would probably look at someone like Cowan and the lower of the 2 firsts as the starting point for Saros.
25 avr. à 13 h 44
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 6,815
Mentions "j'aime": 5,295
Quoting: Jded
You can’t do a sign and trade anymore. ANA isn’t trading Z for an expiring UFA


You can do sign and trades or have extensions agreed upon, you just can't have conditional picks based on players re-signing.
25 avr. à 13 h 49
#5
Puckhead
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2023
Messages: 1,225
Mentions "j'aime": 348
One dipsy doodler for another? Fair trade maybe but not what the Leafs need, a worse version of Marner...also not what Anaheim needs.
25 avr. à 14 h 37
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,760
Mentions "j'aime": 1,793
Quoting: LeafsFanForSomeReason
You can do sign and trades or have extensions agreed upon, you just can't have conditional picks based on players re-signing.


I guess that’s the same thing to me in this instance. Why is Marner opting to sign an extension to be traded to ANA vs walking to FA where he’d have that same offer if not better from ANA, in addition to being able to explore every other team in the NHL (most of which aren’t a back-to-back bottom 3 team)? I see zero incentive for Marner.

Meanwhile ANA is going to take on an additional ~$6-7M cap to move the younger player and a 1st in a year where they hope to improve but aren’t actually going to be competing. While they have the cap space now, they will be in a much different position the next 2 years with all of Dostal, Mintyukov, Zellweger, McTavish, Carlsson, Gauthier, LaCombe, coming off of ELCs

I just don’t see why ANA or Marner would want this
25 avr. à 15 h 3
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 6,815
Mentions "j'aime": 5,295
Quoting: Jded
I guess that’s the same thing to me in this instance. Why is Marner opting to sign an extension to be traded to ANA vs walking to FA where he’d have that same offer if not better from ANA, in addition to being able to explore every other team in the NHL (most of which aren’t a back-to-back bottom 3 team)? I see zero incentive for Marner.

Meanwhile ANA is going to take on an additional ~$6-7M cap to move the younger player and a 1st in a year where they hope to improve but aren’t actually going to be competing. While they have the cap space now, they will be in a much different position the next 2 years with all of Dostal, Mintyukov, Zellweger, McTavish, Carlsson, Gauthier, LaCombe, coming off of ELCs

I just don’t see why ANA or Marner would want this


Can't speak for Marner, but Anaheim would be crazy to turn this down. They're getting the way, WAY better player for peanuts - a late 1st. It's really as simple as that if he's coming with an extension. They've got some GREAT pieces in place for the future, are about to draft another and they'd be lucky if even one became as good as Marner. He's still only about to turn 27. Would help them to take steps in the next few years and in years of their competitive window.

Worts case scenario they could turn around and trade him for more than this in 6 months cause the Leafs are getting jobbed.
25 avr. à 15 h 28
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,760
Mentions "j'aime": 1,793
Quoting: LeafsFanForSomeReason
Can't speak for Marner, but Anaheim would be crazy to turn this down. They're getting the way, WAY better player for peanuts - a late 1st. It's really as simple as that if he's coming with an extension. They've got some GREAT pieces in place for the future, are about to draft another and they'd be lucky if even one became as good as Marner. He's still only about to turn 27. Would help them to take steps in the next few years and in years of their competitive window.

Worts case scenario they could turn around and trade him for more than this in 6 months cause the Leafs are getting jobbed.


More productive thus far? Totally. But my confidence in the gap between them being worth $6-7M per year and a 1st round pick for a player without the positional flexibility (Z played center the last 10 games), who will be on the decline sooner, and will have a very detrimental impact to the salaries the remainder of ANA’s expiring ELCs will ask for is much less clear cut. I’d totally just rather kee Z and gun for a FA RW. There are an abundance of them this summer. Zegras @$5.7M + EDM 1st + top 6 FA RW (like Reinhart or Stammer) > Marner @$12M.

We both know you don’t trade for Marner with a long term extension in place so I’ll ignore that altogether.

I’d personally just choose to keep building on the foundation in ANA making additions without big subtractions. There are holes to fill, we don’t have many surpluses yet
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage