SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Draft to ONL

Créé par: sharcuda22
Équipe: 2024-25 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 23 avr. 2024
Publié: 23 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Tankathon Results: Sharks at 3 and 14
1.) Get Levshunov and trade up if someone you like.
2.) Gonna trust the teal curtain on Couture’s injury.
3.) Mike is trying hard to get Smith to turn pro.
4.) Let Addison and Zadina walk. They had alright years but we have more important players to allow to push for offense and we need to make space for those that dont.
5.) Weaponize your cap space and others lack of
6.) Lundell is a pipe dream, no way florida lets him walk. But i firmly believe that is one of the reasons for making ACGMs they dont need to be 100% serious.
7.) What do we do about the defense :’(
8.) Musty will prolly get his 9 games, but after I would call up guschin or we should trade one of guschin or bords in a deal for top 3 RD. (Flames fans im so sorry I dont watch you or this guy so if this is way off im sorry.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3950 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 025 000 $
21 025 000 $
2800 000 $
31 750 000 $
11 025 000 $
25 500 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Levshunov, Artyom
3950 000 $
Goodrow, Barclay
2775 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Fabbri, Robby
  2. Holl, Justin
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (DET)
  4. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (DAL)
2.
SJS
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (SJS)
3.
FLA
  1. Vanecek, Vitek
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (VGK)
4.
CGY
  1. Bordeleau, Thomas
  2. Chmelevski, Alexander [Liste de réserve]
  3. Emberson, Ty
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (SJS)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de NJD
Logo de DET
Logo de TBL
Logo de VGK
Logo de DAL
Logo de CHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
2025
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de WPG
Logo de SJS
Logo de NJD
2026
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2387 700 000 $70 760 000 $0 $1 307 500 $16 940 000 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
950 000 $950 000 $
C
RFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
828 333 $828 333 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
AG
RFA - 1
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
C, AG
RFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
RFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AD, C
RFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 350 000 $2 350 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 025 000 $1 025 000 $
DG
RFA
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Goodrow, Barclay
775 000 $775 000 $
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
23 avr. à 20 h 12
#1
sharks88
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 351
Mentions "j'aime": 175
Unfortunately yes that's way off for Andersson.

I can see both teams declining that FLA swap.
23 avr. à 20 h 15
#2
Démarrer sujet
sharcuda22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 1,766
Mentions "j'aime": 553
Quoting: sharksdoee
Unfortunately yes that's way off for Andersson.

I can see both teams declining that FLA swap.


TBH i dont see why the sharks dont. We get a player that is perfect timeline for the rebuild and is better than we would get with the first (unless vegas explodes in the offseason).
23 avr. à 20 h 21
#3
sharks88
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 351
Mentions "j'aime": 175
Quoting: sharcuda22
TBH i dont see why the sharks dont. We get a player that is perfect timeline for the rebuild and is better than we would get with the first (unless vegas explodes in the offseason).


Only because Knight could be a gamble, but with upside of course.

Lundell seems to be a very good 3C, but especially if SJ gets the #1, C won't be a pressing need and same with LW which are the positions he could play. Rather see that Vegas 1st put to use drafting or trading for a RHD. In the end I wouldn't hate the trade though as I think the values great and it could end up working out very well for SJ. But also can't see FLA doing it with Bob's age and Lundell's key 2-way play for them.
23 avr. à 20 h 23
#4
Future Norris guy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 15,605
Mentions "j'aime": 8,625
Det, FLA and CGY all laugh and pass, None of those offers are remotely close. Sturm isn't worth more than a 3rd rounder at best.
23 avr. à 20 h 34
#5
Démarrer sujet
sharcuda22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 1,766
Mentions "j'aime": 553
Quoting: MoSeider53
Det, FLA and CGY all laugh and pass, None of those offers are remotely close. Sturm isn't worth more than a 3rd rounder at best.


That trade was proposed by a Red Wing fan… holl is a big negative asset and fabbri is borderline neutral…

FLA and CGY tho im not gonna disagree
23 avr. à 20 h 38
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 1,108
Mentions "j'aime": 552
if FLA moves on from Knight they will keep Lundell as they will have the cap, Knight isn't a negative asset either, he is only 22, and Lundell to Florida is probably worth a ton. No way this gets it done, especially with the fact that Vanecek is going to them (so they don't even save cap space)

Not sure about the Calgary one, but I don't think it really makes sense for SJ anyway
23 avr. à 20 h 38
#7
RecycleShark
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 958
Mentions "j'aime": 267
Andersson would be a great addition, but it would take more to get him.

I'd gamble on Knight, but not for a 1st.
23 avr. à 20 h 42
#8
Future Norris guy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 15,605
Mentions "j'aime": 8,625
Quoting: sharcuda22
That trade was proposed by a Red Wing fan… holl is a big negative asset and fabbri is borderline neutral…

FLA and CGY tho im not gonna disagree


Dude obviously isn't a true Red Wins fan, because we're not giving up assets for Fabbri and Holl. Not sure how many times we need to mention that Holl is a cheap buyout candidate.
23 avr. à 21 h 9
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2024
Messages: 497
Mentions "j'aime": 245
Quoting: sharcuda22
That trade was proposed by a Red Wing fan… holl is a big negative asset and fabbri is borderline neutral…

FLA and CGY tho im not gonna disagree


Holl's not really much of a negative asset when his buyout is peanuts.

Yeah nobody's giving **** for him or even taking him for free... But Detroit ain't paying a premium to dump him either.
23 avr. à 21 h 13
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 10,617
Mentions "j'aime": 8,229
Rather buyout Holl and give Fabbri and maybe a third for Sturm.
sharcuda22 a aimé ceci.
23 avr. à 23 h 7
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 21,731
Mentions "j'aime": 12,063
Quoting: sharcuda22
That trade was proposed by a Red Wing fan… holl is a big negative asset and fabbri is borderline neutral…

FLA and CGY tho im not gonna disagree


Holl's buyout is cheap Detroit buys him out before paying to move him.

Fabbri had 18g - 14a - 32p in 68 games while averaging just under 13 minutes a game.

Only Zetterlund had more goals with 24g. He played 82 games and averaged just under 19 minutes a game.

Along with Zetterlund, Eklund and Granlund had more points but they had a lot more ice time.

He is probably borderline neutral to some teams but SJS isn't one of them. Fabbri would make SJS a better team without a doubt.

I'm not saying SJS should take this deal but Fabbri is quite easily better than Sturm.
24 avr. à 6 h 6
#12
Démarrer sujet
sharcuda22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 1,766
Mentions "j'aime": 553
Quoting: aedoran
Holl's buyout is cheap Detroit buys him out before paying to move him.

Fabbri had 18g - 14a - 32p in 68 games while averaging just under 13 minutes a game.

Only Zetterlund had more goals with 24g. He played 82 games and averaged just under 19 minutes a game.

Along with Zetterlund, Eklund and Granlund had more points but they had a lot more ice time.

He is probably borderline neutral to some teams but SJS isn't one of them. Fabbri would make SJS a better team without a doubt.

I'm not saying SJS should take this deal but Fabbri is quite easily better than Sturm.


I will only say that Sturm is a more important player for the sharks than fabbri would ever be. Why does fabbri only get 13 minutes a night? Are there just other players ahead of him?
24 avr. à 6 h 7
#13
Démarrer sujet
sharcuda22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 1,766
Mentions "j'aime": 553
Quoting: RecycleShark
Andersson would be a great addition, but it would take more to get him.

I'd gamble on Knight, but not for a 1st.


The first is for lundell, im not sure knight has much value at the moment but he is certainly a good rebound candidate.
24 avr. à 6 h 9
#14
Démarrer sujet
sharcuda22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 1,766
Mentions "j'aime": 553
Quoting: MoSeider53
Dude obviously isn't a true Red Wins fan, because we're not giving up assets for Fabbri and Holl. Not sure how many times we need to mention that Holl is a cheap buyout candidate.


Quoting: DanielSan92
Holl's not really much of a negative asset when his buyout is peanuts.

Yeah nobody's giving **** for him or even taking him for free... But Detroit ain't paying a premium to dump him either.


Quoting: Lancebmx
Rather buyout Holl and give Fabbri and maybe a third for Sturm.


I get that. IMO Sturm is worth a third, so if we took out Fabbri (who i also thought was neutral asset at best but wings could better spend the cap my b) and the fourth. Would you do holl and second for Sturm?

Then the instead of holl being an expensive dump he is essentially trading up 1 round to dump him and then Sturm for the “third”
24 avr. à 8 h 21
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 10,617
Mentions "j'aime": 8,229
Quoting: sharcuda22
I get that. IMO Sturm is worth a third, so if we took out Fabbri (who i also thought was neutral asset at best but wings could better spend the cap my b) and the fourth. Would you do holl and second for Sturm?

Then the instead of holl being an expensive dump he is essentially trading up 1 round to dump him and then Sturm for the “third”


I've made that trade before. I don't hate it.
sharcuda22 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage