SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Looking towards next season

Créé par: Hckeydude123
Équipe: 2024-25 Kings de Los Angeles
Date de création initiale: 23 avr. 2024
Publié: 23 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2975 000 $
88 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
34 000 000 $
23 750 000 $
11 000 000 $
2850 000 $
11 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
LAK
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2024 (ANA)
ANA
  1. Gavrikov, Vladislav
Détails additionnels:
Don’t care where he goes just get rid of em
2.
LAK
  1. Binnington, Jordan
  2. Buchnevich, Pavel (2 900 000 $ retained)
STL
  1. Kaliyev, Arthur [Droits de RFA]
  2. Spence, Jordan [Droits de RFA]
  3. Turcotte, Alex [Droits de RFA]
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (LAK)
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2026 (LAK)
Détails additionnels:
Blues can choose between the 2026 1st or 2024 1st. Figured the 2026 1st had more value.
3.
OTT
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2025 (LAK)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Frais de résiliation
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de ANA
Logo de LAK
2025
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2026
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2087 500 000 $89 348 333 $1 850 000 $850 000 $-1 848 333 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
AG, C
RFA
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
AG, AD, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 200 000 $4 200 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
850 000 $850 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
835 000 $835 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
875 000 $875 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
DG
UFA - 7
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DG
UFA
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
23 avr. à 2 h 19
#1
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,439
Mentions "j'aime": 11,399
Obviously there's a lot of value in your offer. I'm not sure it's all the right value.

The 24 1st would be a super nice thing to have, no doubt. Spence is intriguing, but he's also a small Dman (which is going to make the Blues have the heebie jeebies) and an RD, which doesn't really work as things stand in STL. Turcotte is also nice, also not a need fit. Kaliyev would be nice to have, but he's not holding the value he once did. The 25 1st is nice and all, but again, not necessarily in line with pressing needs.

Long story short, you'd be better off keeping many of those young talent assets, forgetting about Binny to find a goalie elsewhere and trying your hand at a Buch offer that kicks off with the 24 1st. I'm not sure the Kings have the right pieces to pull it off, but like Army, I'm here to listen.
23 avr. à 3 h 20
#2
Dekesaladekes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 3,025
Mentions "j'aime": 1,083
What’s wrong with Gavrikov? He was a stud in Columbus
23 avr. à 7 h 19
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,561
Mentions "j'aime": 6,461
Quoting: Dekes
What’s wrong with Gavrikov? He was a stud in Columbus


LA's coaching sucks and it's much easier for fans to blame the players. Also, the lockerroom is a mess, it makes it hard for players to focus on their jobs when there is so much tension
23 avr. à 23 h 44
#4
Dekesaladekes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 3,025
Mentions "j'aime": 1,083
Quoting: Campabee
LA's coaching sucks and it's much easier for fans to blame the players. Also, the lockerroom is a mess, it makes it hard for players to focus on their jobs when there is so much tension


What do you think realistically would be his cost to acquire?
I wouldn’t mind him on the bruins.

Bruins need another strong LHD so lindholm can focus more on offence rather then defence. He’s been taking on a lot of the tough match-ups with mcavoy and doesn’t get as much offensive opportunities as he did last season.

I doubt they go back on Chychrun. I want no part of OEL personally Dillon and Gavrikov would be good fits for me next to mcavoy, they aren’t good transitional dmen but are solid once in the zone and mcavoy Carries the puck most the time anyways so not a glaring whole if they can’t carry the puck
24 avr. à 7 h 8
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,561
Mentions "j'aime": 6,461
Quoting: Dekes
What do you think realistically would be his cost to acquire?
I wouldn’t mind him on the bruins.

Bruins need another strong LHD so lindholm can focus more on offence rather then defence. He’s been taking on a lot of the tough match-ups with mcavoy and doesn’t get as much offensive opportunities as he did last season.

I doubt they go back on Chychrun. I want no part of OEL personally Dillon and Gavrikov would be good fits for me next to mcavoy, they aren’t good transitional dmen but are solid once in the zone and mcavoy Carries the puck most the time anyways so not a glaring whole if they can’t carry the puck


Realistically it's gonna cost at least what LA gave up but I don't think LA will be looking to move him (whether the op likes it or not) they are also in win now mode and need him on their blueline.

I know they are young but both Harris and Struble are great defensively and can transition up ice well. They are better suited to the bottom 4 so I wouldn't necessarily put either with McAvoy on the top pair but both could be had for about a 2nd
Dekes a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage