SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Keeping Drouin

Créé par: HockeyManiac95
Équipe: 2024-25 Avalanche du Colorado
Date de création initiale: 17 avr. 2024
Publié: 17 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Landy returns, but so does Drouin. Here's hoping he values fit over money and is willing to do a bridge deal.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
2875 000 $
2775 000 $
2775 000 $
2775 000 $
2850 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
46 000 000 $
2775 000 $
2775 000 $
2850 000 $
2775 000 $
2775 000 $
2775 000 $
2825 000 $
2775 000 $
2775 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
22 500 000 $
21 950 000 $
2775 000 $
2775 000 $
2775 000 $
2775 000 $
2775 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Davis, Matthew
2950 000 $
Transactions
1.
COL
  1. Jarry, Tristan (2 375 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
3rd team can retain if necessary.
PIT
  1. Georgiev, Alexandar
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (COL)
  3. Choix de 5e ronde en 2024 (ANA)
2.
COL
  1. Burroughs, Kyle
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (NJD)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de NJD
Logo de COL
Logo de SEA
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de NSH
2025
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
2026
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de PHI
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2187 700 000 $87 058 750 $0 $57 500 $641 250 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
12 600 000 $12 600 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
AD, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, C
RFA
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
C, AG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
896 250 $896 250 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 950 000 $1 950 000 $
AG, C
UFA
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
837 500 $837 500 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
875 000 $875 000 $
DG
RFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
775 000 $775 000 $
DG/DD
UFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
17 avr. à 2 h 54
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,237
Mentions "j'aime": 4,673
I like Mason, but giving up a high 2nd for a 32 year old making 4.5 for a couple more years runs a high risk of regressing, plus we’re likely not in his list.
Xqb15a et HockeyManiac95 a aimé ceci.
17 avr. à 3 h 21
#2
Good nerd
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 757
Mentions "j'aime": 424
Why are the Avs giving up a 1st round pick to make what appears to be a lateral move in net with very marginal cap savings from the swap? That seems like change just for the sake of change with a very high cost.

I also think you should lower your expectations on the return for whoever you all choose as your cap dump. It won't be as bad as it was this past offseason with the cap finally going up, but a 2nd coming back for Manson at his current age and contract alone seems high. He does still have value though, so I don't think it is so dire that you'd need to attach picks to move him. With teams knowing that this is a cap dump, the value of the return will be depressed.
TJTwolf, Xqb15a et HockeyManiac95 a aimé ceci.
17 avr. à 3 h 50
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,605
Mentions "j'aime": 4,583
No to the Jarry deal. It's giving up assets for a lateral move at best. If SJ will do that and aren't on Manson's NTC list then pull the trigger. Could even drop the pick lower and I'd probably say it still works.
tupty, Anus_McLeod, Xqb15a and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
17 avr. à 5 h 46
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 2,454
Mentions "j'aime": 1,593
Man, outside of the 1st pairing that D corps would get caved-in grimace
TJTwolf, Anus_McLeod, Xqb15a and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
17 avr. à 9 h 23
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,442
Mentions "j'aime": 9,076
Yeah not good on any front for COL, SJS is finally embracing the rebuild so that move makes no sense for them, and that d-corp woof that 3rd pairing. I really think Georgiev is just going to be traded though not for Jarry who can’t stay healthy, and no way Manson gets traded.
HockeyManiac95 et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
17 avr. à 9 h 26
#6
Démarrer sujet
and proud of it
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 2,257
Mentions "j'aime": 1,605
Quoting: TJTwolf
No to the Jarry deal. It's giving up assets for a lateral move at best. If SJ will do that and aren't on Manson's NTC list then pull the trigger. Could even drop the pick lower and I'd probably say it still works.


Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
I like Mason, but giving up a high 2nd for a 32 year old making 4.5 for a couple more years runs a high risk of regressing, plus we’re likely not in his list.


Yeah just used his trade out of Anaheim as a direct comparison. I would do it for a 3rd instead of a 2nd
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
17 avr. à 9 h 27
#7
Démarrer sujet
and proud of it
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 2,257
Mentions "j'aime": 1,605
Quoting: SupremeBone
Man, outside of the 1st pairing that D corps would get caved-in grimace


Quoting: Xqb15a
Yeah not good on any front for COL, SJS is finally embracing the rebuild so that move makes no sense for them, and that d-corp woof that 3rd pairing. I really think Georgiev is just going to be traded though not for Jarry who can’t stay healthy, and no way Manson gets traded.


Yeah I just can't see a way that everything else gets done and we keep both of Girard/Manson
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
17 avr. à 9 h 29
#8
Démarrer sujet
and proud of it
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 2,257
Mentions "j'aime": 1,605
Quoting: tupty
Why are the Avs giving up a 1st round pick to make what appears to be a lateral move in net with very marginal cap savings from the swap? That seems like change just for the sake of change with a very high cost.

I also think you should lower your expectations on the return for whoever you all choose as your cap dump. It won't be as bad as it was this past offseason with the cap finally going up, but a 2nd coming back for Manson at his current age and contract alone seems high. He does still have value though, so I don't think it is so dire that you'd need to attach picks to move him. With teams knowing that this is a cap dump, the value of the return will be depressed.


Saw a deal similar to the Jarry deal with a 2nd instead of a 1st with no retention. We need something retained somehow. Maybe just add another mid pick instead?
17 avr. à 10 h 24
#9
Good nerd
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 757
Mentions "j'aime": 424
Quoting: HockeyManiac95
Saw a deal similar to the Jarry deal with a 2nd instead of a 1st with no retention. We need something retained somehow. Maybe just add another mid pick instead?


I don't like Jarry's contract. He lost the starting job at the end of the season to Ned, who is a UFA. If PIT retains half then maybe you could trade a 2nd, but I don't think they would do that and I think you all have better options in net that don't require draft picks. If Landy comes back, you all almost certainly need to just grit your teeth and move out a contract.
HockeyManiac95 et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
17 avr. à 11 h 1
#10
Démarrer sujet
and proud of it
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 2,257
Mentions "j'aime": 1,605
Quoting: tupty
I don't like Jarry's contract. He lost the starting job at the end of the season to Ned, who is a UFA. If PIT retains half then maybe you could trade a 2nd, but I don't think they would do that and I think you all have better options in net that don't require draft picks. If Landy comes back, you all almost certainly need to just grit your teeth and move out a contract.


Hence the Manson trade (or Girard)
TJTwolf et tupty a aimé ceci.
18 avr. à 1 h 57
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 4,191
Mentions "j'aime": 1,002
SJ not paying anything for anyone over 30.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage