SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Chuky

Créé par: RecycleShark
Équipe: 2025-26 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 17 avr. 2024
Publié: 17 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3900 000 $
3850 000 $
3950 000 $
3850 000 $
3900 000 $
3800 000 $
3900 000 $
3775 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 100 000 $
2900 000 $
2850 000 $
3950 000 $
22 000 000 $
31 500 000 $
2950 000 $
3900 000 $
31 100 000 $
33 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
3850 000 $
23 250 000 $
3950 000 $
2950 000 $
22 000 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Celebrini, Macklin
39 500 000 $
Yakemchuk, Carter
3900 000 $
Davis, Matt
3900 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (BOS)
2.
SJS
  1. Quillan, Jacob
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2024 (CGY)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2026 (TOR)
3.
SJS
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (VAN)
4.
SJS
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2026 (NYR)
5.
SJS
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2025 (SJS)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de NJD
Logo de TBL
Logo de VGK
Logo de CHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de CGY
Logo de SJS
2025
Logo de SJS
Logo de VGK
Logo de SJS
Logo de BOS
Logo de SJS
Logo de WPG
Logo de VAN
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de NJD
2026
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de TOR
Logo de NYR
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $54 516 667 $0 $1 907 500 $28 983 333 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
RFA - 1
Celebrini, Macklin
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD
RFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $$250K)
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
950 000 $950 000 $
C
RFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
941 667 $941 667 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
RFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $$250K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
940 000 $940 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
RFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
950 000 $950 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
867 500 $867 500 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Yakemchuk, Carter
900 000 $900 000 $
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
950 000 $950 000 $
G
UFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG
RFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
900 000 $900 000 $
DD
RFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
900 000 $900 000 $
G
RFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DG
RFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
RFA
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
900 000 $900 000 $
DD
RFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
AD
UFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
17 avr. à 2 h 12
#1
GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 3,901
Mentions "j'aime": 1,735
NYR says no to expensive bottom 6 Fw. They have a lot of inexpensive alternatives in the system for next year. They don't even take him if you pay us to take him.
17 avr. à 2 h 57
#2
train, train
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 3,017
Mentions "j'aime": 733
If the youth end up all being alright, man oh man would this hit.
17 avr. à 4 h 30
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 329
Mentions "j'aime": 183
Do you really see Klim Kostin us that much? (sorry, wanted to make the terrible pun, don't mind me).

I'm also not a fan of the Bordeleau trade. Bordeleau's seemed decent at the NHL level and it's probably fairly unlikely that whoever we get with the likely late 2nd from the Bruins will be better than him. Bordeleau is still only 22 so he definitely fits our timeline so swapping him for a pick who is likely at best comparable to him who is unlikely to be NHL ready until around 2028 doesn't make much sense to me.
17 avr. à 5 h 19
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,289
Mentions "j'aime": 3,037
Why would Blackwood be worth anything at all to anyone? Why would someone pay to take a low upside risk on him rather than just taking that same risk on an underperforming goalie in free agency for free?
17 avr. à 16 h 19
#5
Démarrer sujet
RecycleShark
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 956
Mentions "j'aime": 266
Quoting: jamnjon
Do you really see Klim Kostin us that much? (sorry, wanted to make the terrible pun, don't mind me).

I'm also not a fan of the Bordeleau trade. Bordeleau's seemed decent at the NHL level and it's probably fairly unlikely that whoever we get with the likely late 2nd from the Bruins will be better than him. Bordeleau is still only 22 so he definitely fits our timeline so swapping him for a pick who is likely at best comparable to him who is unlikely to be NHL ready until around 2028 doesn't make much sense to me.


If we don't make Kostin a qualifying offer, another team might Klim him. Ok yours was punnier.

My thinking on Bords is that the Sharks have too many small forwards. I can't see them keeping both Bords and Gush. I like Gush better and Bords probably has the higher trade value at this point. He's worth a 2nd max. Would you trade Gush instead? Keep both?
17 avr. à 17 h 46
#6
Démarrer sujet
RecycleShark
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 956
Mentions "j'aime": 266
Quoting: Byrr
Why would Blackwood be worth anything at all to anyone? Why would someone pay to take a low upside risk on him rather than just taking that same risk on an underperforming goalie in free agency for free?


Blackwood played well this year. His stats are more a reflection of the team in front of him. He's an NHL starting goaltender, even on better teams.
17 avr. à 18 h 43
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,289
Mentions "j'aime": 3,037
Quoting: RecycleShark
Blackwood played well this year. His stats are more a reflection of the team in front of him. He's an NHL starting goaltender, even on better teams.


Then why wasn't he that in New Jersey, a better team? Been there, done that, didn't have the result you want to claim he will have.
17 avr. à 22 h 21
#8
Craig Laughlin Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 5,320
Mentions "j'aime": 5,746
Depending on the other moves the Caps make in the offseason, I wouldn't particularly mind this. Would have to rely on the Caps moving one of McMichael, Lapierre, or Bordeleau to the wing though.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage