SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Pens return

Créé par: GuentzelvaniaUSA
Équipe: 2024-25 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 16 avr. 2024
Publié: 16 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
2850 000 $
2850 000 $
2850 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
39 000 000 $
36 000 000 $
32 500 000 $
11 500 000 $
11 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
PIT
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (CHI)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (NYR)
2.
PIT
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (DET)
OTT
  1. Smith, Reilly (1 000 000 $ retained)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de PIT
Logo de PHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de DET
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de NYR
2025
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de NYR
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2026
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2287 000 000 $86 824 342 $0 $20 000 $175 658 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD
UFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 450 000 $2 450 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
850 000 $850 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
795 000 $795 000 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
800 000 $800 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
G
UFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG
RFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
G
UFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
RFA
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
850 000 $850 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD, AG
RFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
16 avr. à 15 h 33
#26
SkateOrDie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 2,418
Mentions "j'aime": 395
Quoting: JSEB93
Just to add even more proof - look at Letang and EK combined numbers when playing with Pettersson vs Graves vs POJ.

Pettersson:
+18
52.5 xGF
53% SCF

Graves:
-2
50% xGF
49.5 SCF%

POJ:
-1
49% xGF
50 SCF%

So EK/Letang are doing as well with Mr AHL POJ as they are with big contract Ryan Graves. And yet you'll argue that POJ is an AHLer and Graves is having a good season for his contract. And where's your proof? All you have is GA/60 which I already proved is because of his abnormally high on ice sv%


I am more than happy to have the POJ argument.
POJ 5v5 oiGA is almost a full goal ahead of Graves at 2.9 to 2.
He bleeds almost 50% more goals on the ice in 5v5 play. Period.
Graves is not an offensive defensemen, we have established his deployment is mainly in the defensive role, So I don't care what his offensive numbers are. That's not what they asked him to do. They asked him to stop the goals from bleeding. that is obvious.
16 avr. à 15 h 35
#27
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 3,398
Mentions "j'aime": 1,019
Quoting: LuckyMoneyPuck
Lets look at your stats first.
his corsi is almost 50%, he does as hockey-ref show get 58% of his starts in dzone.
that's about what you should expect there. It's average. No other top 4 is getting those dzone starts.
Is that it?
lets do some comparable around the league.
https://www.hockey-reference.com/players/o/oleksja01.html Jamie Oleksiak
https://www.hockey-reference.com/players/r/romanal01.html Alexander Romanov
https://www.hockey-reference.com/players/w/walkese01.html Sean Walker
https://www.hockey-reference.com/players/l/lindees01.html Esa Lindell 5.8 mil
https://www.hockey-reference.com/players/l/lauzoje01.html Jeremy Lauzon
https://www.hockey-reference.com/players/m/mcnabbr01.html Brayden McNabb
https://www.hockey-reference.com/players/g/gavrivl01.html Gavrikov, Vladislav 5.8 mil
https://www.hockey-reference.com/players/o/orlovdm01.html Dmitry Orlov 7.7 mil



I picked those almost random. Some I had to pass on, low number of games, or I knew they were not 2LD like on PHL who traded their 2LD to COL.
It's 1/4 the league. Depth chart has them as 2LD.
It's from a mix of team roughly same level as the penguins some teams are better. I tried not to take bottom teams as their stats might be a bit bias against the defensemen.
Graves number are roughly average for a 2LD. You can see so above.
There are 1 or 2 who are better defenseman than Graves. There is no doubt Orlov is a better defenseman than Graves. He is also getting 7.7 mil per.
One could argue some of Gavrikov stats have him as a slight improvement. He's getting 5.8 mil per.

You are going to have to do better on your statistical arguments. As you got an average 2LD there, on an average 2LD salary.
Jamie Oleksiak is one of the closest comparable. Big, defensive defenseman, roughly same salary. Near identical numbers.
You don't here SEA fans slamming him all day long every day.

Try again.


Correct, almost 50% - as in 49%. Which is what I said. MoneyPuck has his ACTUAL dzone starts at 12.7%. Why did you say "is that it" as if you made some kind of point?

No - I don't need to do any better. You on the other hand - need to do significantly better.

Nowhere did you prove he isn't having a bad season. Try again.
16 avr. à 15 h 48
#28
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 3,398
Mentions "j'aime": 1,019
Quoting: LuckyMoneyPuck
I am more than happy to have the POJ argument.
POJ 5v5 oiGA is almost a full goal ahead of Graves at 2.9 to 2.
He bleeds almost 50% more goals on the ice in 5v5 play. Period.
Graves is not an offensive defensemen, we have established his deployment is mainly in the defensive role, So I don't care what his offensive numbers are. That's not what they asked him to do. They asked him to stop the goals from bleeding. that is obvious.


I don't think you are - because you just completely avoided my stats comparing Graves and POJ playing with the same d partner. And how it's significantly worse than with Pettersson. Again - Graves' abnormally high on ice sv% is what makes him better in the GA/60 metric.

His deployment isn't the defensive zone - we've established that. Okay but don't you care that he's also been bad defensively? Yes - they did. And he's not doing that
16 avr. à 15 h 58
#29
SkateOrDie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 2,418
Mentions "j'aime": 395
Quoting: JSEB93
I don't think you are - because you just completely avoided my stats comparing Graves and POJ playing with the same d partner. And how it's significantly worse than with Pettersson. Again - Graves' abnormally high on ice sv% is what makes him better in the GA/60 metric.

His deployment isn't the defensive zone - we've established that. Okay but don't you care that he's also been bad defensively? Yes - they did. And he's not doing that


again, you showed offensive stats. POJ is paired with letang in the Ozone because he can't defend. ... POJ does not drive those numbers. He's just a ride along and keeping him out his own end.

There is no abnormally high sv% Graves 5v5 PDO is 99.7 .... that means they are statistically on par. again leading with numbers not opinions on how it got there.
58.5 D zone starts 5v5.... defensive use... leading with numbers
https://www.hockey-reference.com/players/g/gravery01.html

Don't tell me what your opinion of it is.... those are the stats.
16 avr. à 16 h 6
#30
SkateOrDie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 2,418
Mentions "j'aime": 395
Quoting: JSEB93
Correct, almost 50% - as in 49%. Which is what I said. MoneyPuck has his ACTUAL dzone starts at 12.7%. Why did you say "is that it" as if you made some kind of point?

No - I don't need to do any better. You on the other hand - need to do significantly better.

Nowhere did you prove he isn't having a bad season. Try again.


I don't think you get it.
I only need to show his play is average 2LD play.
Which was the whole point. You just don't get what bad 2LD play is.
All his numbers rank up in line in average with other 2LD.
There are a handful that have better numbers. They are also getting paid far more... Like Orlov. But they didn't want to pay 7.7 mil per for that level of player, so don't expect that level of player.
Go look at the numbers.
You will see.
His corsi is on par, his fenwick is no par. His oiGA is better than most. He's not a turn over machine.
They paid for a 2LD....they got a 2LD. It's not a "bad" season..... it's just what a 2LD is.
Be glad he's a guy who only gave up a 5v5 oiGA 2.0 as some of these guys are far worse.

So again. Show me through the stats. Compare the 2LDs. Where are the huge issues that say "bad" season.
16 avr. à 16 h 14
#31
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 3,398
Mentions "j'aime": 1,019
Quoting: LuckyMoneyPuck
again, you showed offensive stats. POJ is paired with letang in the Ozone because he can't defend. ... POJ does not drive those numbers. He's just a ride along and keeping him out his own end.

There is no abnormally high sv% Graves 5v5 PDO is 99.7 .... that means they are statistically on par. again leading with numbers not opinions on how it got there.
58.5 D zone starts 5v5.... defensive use... leading with numbers
https://www.hockey-reference.com/players/g/gravery01.html

Don't tell me what your opinion of it is.... those are the stats.


??? No I didn't. I showed overall metrics - which is exactly what we should be looking at. POJ is paired with Letang because that's his current d partner. POJ also gets the same % of ozone starts as Graves. If he's just a ride along then so is Graves.

Yes - Graves has an abnormally high on ice sv%. This is just a factual statement. Clearly you don't know what PDO is. You're not leading with numbers lol - you are going solely based on your opinion.

And you've provided absolutely no stats that show he has had a good season. Anybody can just throw out numbers.
16 avr. à 16 h 17
#32
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 3,398
Mentions "j'aime": 1,019
Quoting: LuckyMoneyPuck
I don't think you get it.
I only need to show his play is average 2LD play.
Which was the whole point. You just don't get what bad 2LD play is.
All his numbers rank up in line in average with other 2LD.
There are a handful that have better numbers. They are also getting paid far more... Like Orlov. But they didn't want to pay 7.7 mil per for that level of player, so don't expect that level of player.
Go look at the numbers.
You will see.
His corsi is on par, his fenwick is no par. His oiGA is better than most. He's not a turn over machine.
They paid for a 2LD....they got a 2LD. It's not a "bad" season..... it's just what a 2LD is.
Be glad he's a guy who only gave up a 5v5 oiGA 2.0 as some of these guys are far worse.

So again. Show me through the stats. Compare the 2LDs. Where are the huge issues that say "bad" season.


Honestly I don't think you get anything. Okay then do it. Because you have yet to do so. They got 2LD having a very bad season for his contract. Except it is a bad season. You are the only person on planet Earth saying he's had a good season. There's a reason for that. Take a hint. Dude I've explained the GA/60 thing like 50 times already. That is the only number you have and are clinging to it - and not only is that one facet of the game but I've explained the issue with it.

I've provided ample evidence. Not my fault if you won't take the time to read it. You on the other hand - have provided no evidence that he's having a good season.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage