SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Next Year

Créé par: DFinn91
Équipe: 2024-25 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 8 avr. 2024
Publié: 11 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Overpay Lindholm on a short term deal. If he’s not a fit you can trade him in the last year with retention when the Sharks have a slot freed up.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3950 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 500 000 $
21 500 000 $
1900 000 $
34 000 000 $
23 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
58 500 000 $
56 500 000 $
29 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Liljegren, Timothy [Droits de RFA]
TOR
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (SJS)
2.
SJS
  1. Poulin, Samuel [Droits de RFA]
  2. Rakell, Rickard
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (PIT)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2026 (SJS)
PIT
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2024 (CHI)
3.
SJS
  1. Lee, Anders
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (NYI)
NYI
4.
SJS
ARI
  1. Benning, Matthew
  2. Rutta, Jan
Détails additionnels:
Any team
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de NJD
Logo de TBL
Logo de VGK
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
2025
Logo de SJS
Logo de VGK
Logo de SJS
Logo de NYI
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de WPG
Logo de SJS
Logo de NJD
2026
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2387 700 000 $85 831 667 $0 $1 250 000 $1 868 333 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
RFA - 2
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Islanders de New York
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
950 000 $950 000 $
C
RFA
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C, AG
RFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD, C
RFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 350 000 $2 350 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG
RFA
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
RFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
900 000 $900 000 $
DD
RFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 avr. à 13 h 5
#1
Flyers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 526
Mentions "j'aime": 234
IDK this team seems very average. I wouldn't throw money around yet if I was SJ.
DFinn91 a aimé ceci.
11 avr. à 13 h 12
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 1,078
Mentions "j'aime": 536
a little too much too early, but I like getting Liljegren, idk for the 22oa pick,

Want to sign a top 6 forward, at least 1 top 4 dman
I do not love the idea of doing that AND taking on cap dumps as I want the young guys to be able to get lineup spots.
11 avr. à 13 h 17
#3
Syd Barret
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 996
Mentions "j'aime": 479
Modifié 11 avr. à 13 h 25
I doubt penguins are doing that lol. RR has had a very down year yes. But there is no reason to give up on him that quickly. He was 2 goals shy of 30 last year.....
I could see them doing Smith for FC though
11 avr. à 13 h 37
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 550
Mentions "j'aime": 201
Quoting: Renegade_H
IDK this team seems very average. I wouldn't throw money around yet if I was SJ.


An average NHL team and after the 2024 draft maybe the best prospect pool in the league. I’ll take that!
11 avr. à 13 h 44
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 550
Mentions "j'aime": 201
Quoting: SydBarrett
I doubt penguins are doing that lol. RR has had a very down year yes. But there is no reason to give up on him that quickly. He was 2 goals shy of 30 last year.....
I could see them doing Smith for FC though


I took this from a Penguins fan’s AGM although I know fans have differing opinions.
11 avr. à 13 h 45
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 550
Mentions "j'aime": 201
Quoting: Letsgosharks
a little too much too early, but I like getting Liljegren, idk for the 22oa pick,

Want to sign a top 6 forward, at least 1 top 4 dman
I do not love the idea of doing that AND taking on cap dumps as I want the young guys to be able to get lineup spots.


I think with Liljegren being so young there’s a good shot he’ll provide more value than the 32nd overall pick.
11 avr. à 13 h 49
#7
Stovetop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 1,987
Mentions "j'aime": 869
Quoting: SydBarrett
I doubt penguins are doing that lol. RR has had a very down year yes. But there is no reason to give up on him that quickly. He was 2 goals shy of 30 last year.....
I could see them doing Smith for FC though


I wouldn't take on Rakell unless a 1st was going with him. That's an awful contract and he'd just be taking a young players spot who deserves it more. It's like taking on Hoffman if hoffman had 4 more years
DFinn91 a aimé ceci.
11 avr. à 13 h 55
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 550
Mentions "j'aime": 201
Quoting: AStovetop
I wouldn't take on Rakell unless a 1st was going with him. That's an awful contract and he'd just be taking a young players spot who deserves it more. It's like taking on Hoffman if hoffman had 4 more years


I’d push back on that. The Athletic’s player cards have Rakell’s value right at his $5M cap hit. And what younger players is he blocking? Am I missing the top 6 RWs in the Sharks system?
SolarHarbor a aimé ceci.
11 avr. à 14 h 14
#9
Stovetop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 1,987
Mentions "j'aime": 869
Quoting: DFinn91
I’d push back on that. The Athletic’s player cards have Rakell’s value right at his $5M cap hit. And what younger players is he blocking? Am I missing the top 6 RWs in the Sharks system?


Well there's plenty of candidates who could push for a spot at training camp, including Gushchin, Graf, Zetterlund (demoting him after how well he's played this season is wild), Musty, Bordeleau, possibly Chmelevski, Also the most likely starting place for Smith if he made the team or Celebrini if Sharks land him. Again, there's 4 more years on this deal, that's the big issue for me. It's not about just next year
RecycleShark a aimé ceci.
11 avr. à 14 h 47
#10
RecycleShark
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 951
Mentions "j'aime": 265
I liked that Penguin's trade the first time I saw it, until I realized that RR's contract had 4 years left.
11 avr. à 14 h 54
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 966
Mentions "j'aime": 415
Quoting: AStovetop
I wouldn't take on Rakell unless a 1st was going with him. That's an awful contract and he'd just be taking a young players spot who deserves it more. It's like taking on Hoffman if hoffman had 4 more years


I wouldn't cap dump Rakell. His 5v5 points/60 haven't much changed since last season. His drop in production comes from a) seeing much less time on the top line, and b) being hit particularly hard by the Pens' power play woes.
I don't see any reason for the Pens to sell low on Rakell unless they're 100% certain they can replace him without getting worse. I'm not sure they can.
DFinn91 et SolarHarbor a aimé ceci.
11 avr. à 14 h 59
#12
RecycleShark
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 951
Mentions "j'aime": 265
Roy, Toffoli, and Lindholm are nice additions. Poulin would be a good gamble. Not sure Liljegren is worth that 2nd.

I looked at Lee as an interesting potential cap dump trade as well. I'm not sure NYI consider him a cap dump, though.

Nice ideas overall. Agree with others this might be too much too soon. Too many veteran forwards.
DFinn91 a aimé ceci.
11 avr. à 15 h 8
#13
SkateOrDie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 2,210
Mentions "j'aime": 375
If the NYI are giving away Lee Anders there are a half dozen teams more interested than this offer from SJS
11 avr. à 16 h 23
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 968
Mentions "j'aime": 547
If we only have to pay a 2nd to dump Lee I'd be happy but I doubt Lou pays to dump Lee
DFinn91 a aimé ceci.
11 avr. à 16 h 24
#15
Syd Barret
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 996
Mentions "j'aime": 479
Quoting: AStovetop
I wouldn't take on Rakell unless a 1st was going with him. That's an awful contract and he'd just be taking a young players spot who deserves it more. It's like taking on Hoffman if hoffman had 4 more years


those two are in no way comparable tears of joy tears of joy
In stats, play style, and off - ice issues. Not even close.
SolarHarbor a aimé ceci.
11 avr. à 16 h 48
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2024
Messages: 107
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Hard pass on Rakell trade... No way Id pay to move a guy who scored 60 points last year and is only 30
Thats quite the ask too wow
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage