SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

How we could line up

Créé par: Marcsnack
Équipe: 2024-25 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 10 avr. 2024
Publié: 10 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
The last D-man can be any player. Didnt know if I wanted to sign someone long-term, or just go for a 1/2 year deal and hope Graves picks it up.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2950 000 $
2775 000 $
2800 000 $
2950 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
24 000 000 $
55 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
PIT
  1. Berggren, Jonatan [Droits de RFA]
  2. Husso, Ville
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (DET)
2.
PIT
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (NSH)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de PIT
Logo de PHI
Logo de DET
Logo de NSH
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de NYR
2025
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2026
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2287 675 000 $81 599 342 $0 $20 000 $6 075 658 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
950 000 $950 000 $
AD, AG
RFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
950 000 $950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
795 000 $795 000 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 450 000 $2 450 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
G
UFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
775 000 $775 000 $
DD
RFA
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
800 000 $800 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
10 avr. à 12 h 5
#1
Caps Sufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2024
Messages: 36
Mentions "j'aime": 4
Monahan signs for more.
Marcsnack a aimé ceci.
10 avr. à 12 h 6
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 3,345
Mentions "j'aime": 1,184
Quoting: SlapShotOvi
Monahan signs for more.


Sure, that's fine. We have the cap.
10 avr. à 12 h 39
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 10,619
Mentions "j'aime": 8,229
I don't think Detroit would be interested in buying Jarry, at least not at that price. Rather just run with Husso and hope he rebounds.
10 avr. à 13 h 28
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 3,389
Mentions "j'aime": 1,018
Modifié 10 avr. à 14 h 40
I'd be fine with a Monahan signing - as well as the Smith trade. Not the biggest fan of the whole goalie scenario though. It seems a bit steep for Ned - and if we're paying him starter money I'd probably try Blomqvist as the backup to spend money elsewhere. And while I'm not opposed to trading Jarry I'm not the biggest fan of the return - mainly in bringing back Husso. Although I understand the thought process with him only having one year left - and that DET would probably want that cap going back. You've got some extra cap space as well that I'd try to utilize.

EDIT: My bad - forgot to read the description about the last dman and realize there was a hole there haha. Yikes. Ignore my cap comment
Marcsnack a aimé ceci.
10 avr. à 16 h 36
#5
SkateOrDie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 2,347
Mentions "j'aime": 381
Monahan has all the look and feel of a trap contract and I really wouldn't want to be tied up in that for 5 years on a guy who's gonna be 30 next season.
Not to mention 5 years is a very problematic situation. You got Yager who will need some time at Center. This team is constantly holding it's youth back. It has to end.
Poulin did a half way decent job at center. Yet this team is constantly pushing him down and not giving him a chance. And for what? So Puustinen who is a RL player to get time?
I mean really these types of decisions need to go.
Play the kid and give him his chance. It's time already.

They don't need to bring in these 30 year old guys blocking the way anymore. By all reports Yager should be able to compete for a spot next year. You got Poulin so that's 2 roles filled.
Marcsnack a aimé ceci.
10 avr. à 17 h 10
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 3,345
Mentions "j'aime": 1,184
Quoting: Lancebmx
I don't think Detroit would be interested in buying Jarry, at least not at that price. Rather just run with Husso and hope he rebounds.


Husso has been under .900% for both seasons with DET. I feel like Jarry is a clear upgrade, and the assets moved dont hurt DET.
10 avr. à 17 h 11
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 3,345
Mentions "j'aime": 1,184
Quoting: JSEB93
I'd be fine with a Monahan signing - as well as the Smith trade. Not the biggest fan of the whole goalie scenario though. It seems a bit steep for Ned - and if we're paying him starter money I'd probably try Blomqvist as the backup to spend money elsewhere. And while I'm not opposed to trading Jarry I'm not the biggest fan of the return - mainly in bringing back Husso. Although I understand the thought process with him only having one year left - and that DET would probably want that cap going back. You've got some extra cap space as well that I'd try to utilize.

EDIT: My bad - forgot to read the description about the last dman and realize there was a hole there haha. Yikes. Ignore my cap comment


Hard to move Jarry without taking a goalie back. Obviously, I would like to run Blomqvist, but wouldnt mind one more year.
JSEB93 a aimé ceci.
10 avr. à 17 h 13
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 3,345
Mentions "j'aime": 1,184
Quoting: LuckyMoneyPuck
Monahan has all the look and feel of a trap contract and I really wouldn't want to be tied up in that for 5 years on a guy who's gonna be 30 next season.
Not to mention 5 years is a very problematic situation. You got Yager who will need some time at Center. This team is constantly holding it's youth back. It has to end.
Poulin did a half way decent job at center. Yet this team is constantly pushing him down and not giving him a chance. And for what? So Puustinen who is a RL player to get time?
I mean really these types of decisions need to go.
Play the kid and give him his chance. It's time already.

They don't need to bring in these 30 year old guys blocking the way anymore. By all reports Yager should be able to compete for a spot next year. You got Poulin so that's 2 roles filled.


I could defo see that. Just dont see that many 3C options that are available, barring Monahan, Stephenson & Domi. I dont know if the Pens trust Poulin to run that 3C spot. Yager probably needs a year in the AHL, but hey, I wouldnt be against them being on the team if they are ready.
10 avr. à 18 h 3
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 10,619
Mentions "j'aime": 8,229
Quoting: Marcsnack
Husso has been under .900% for both seasons with DET. I feel like Jarry is a clear upgrade, and the assets moved dont hurt DET.


Goaltending isn't completely our issue. I don't think Jarry would be much better on this Detroit team. We really need to upgrade our team defense. Also we need to shed salary to help do so and adding 625K won't help. Rather use that cap, and assets if needed, to upgrade the team infront of the goalie.
Marcsnack a aimé ceci.
10 avr. à 23 h 51
#10
SkateOrDie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 2,347
Mentions "j'aime": 381
Quoting: Marcsnack
Hard to move Jarry without taking a goalie back. Obviously, I would like to run Blomqvist, but wouldnt mind one more year.


The problem with this is they are trying to bring in the russian, and there isn't room down there for both. I'm pretty sure the plan is to move Bloom up if he comes over.

Quoting: Marcsnack
I could defo see that. Just dont see that many 3C options that are available, barring Monahan, Stephenson & Domi. I dont know if the Pens trust Poulin to run that 3C spot. Yager probably needs a year in the AHL, but hey, I wouldnt be against them being on the team if they are ready.


why do you think they need to add a 3C?
You have both Eller and Acciari still on contract, and you didn't trade either here. Don't get me wrong, I don't think either is great at 3C, but either one is capable of playing it in a bridge year if you are unwilling to play Poulin, Yager or Ponomarev there. Either way the last thing they need is a guy signed to a 5 year deal there. It just doesn't match up.

I honestly think if this team could pull it's head out it's backside and give it's youth a real chance next year could be interesting.
You got Yager who might be able to fill a top 6 role, Koivunen who might be able to do the same or middle 6. You got Poulin who could play 3C.
While I'm sure there will be some growing pains, I'd rather have those and let them grow and hope the legs make up for it. They could use the cap to shore up other areas like 3rd pair on short term deals.

I don't think outside of a few of these prospects taking off there is anything they can do to become a legit contender. There simply isn't enough depth there and not enough cap space to totally rebuild the team without moving a lot of bodies out. That isn't really feasible. They will be lucky to move one of either Smith, Eller and Acciari out. I wouldn't expect more than that if any.
What I do know is it's unreasonable to expect the type of super human effort out of Crosby to carry the team on his back at 37 for 82 games. They can't bring in enough from the outside in limited cap space.
If they are going to spend big they should focus on someone like Reinhart. As they will need a real difference maker to put in the top 6. As they have no chance with the 2nd line performing like it did this year.
Marcsnack a aimé ceci.
10 avr. à 23 h 57
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 3,345
Mentions "j'aime": 1,184
Quoting: LuckyMoneyPuck
The problem with this is they are trying to bring in the russian, and there isn't room down there for both. I'm pretty sure the plan is to move Bloom up if he comes over.



why do you think they need to add a 3C?
You have both Eller and Acciari still on contract, and you didn't trade either here. Don't get me wrong, I don't think either is great at 3C, but either one is capable of playing it in a bridge year if you are unwilling to play Poulin, Yager or Ponomarev there. Either way the last thing they need is a guy signed to a 5 year deal there. It just doesn't match up.

I honestly think if this team could pull it's head out it's backside and give it's youth a real chance next year could be interesting.
You got Yager who might be able to fill a top 6 role, Koivunen who might be able to do the same or middle 6. You got Poulin who could play 3C.
While I'm sure there will be some growing pains, I'd rather have those and let them grow and hope the legs make up for it. They could use the cap to shore up other areas like 3rd pair on short term deals.

I don't think outside of a few of these prospects taking off there is anything they can do to become a legit contender. There simply isn't enough depth there and not enough cap space to totally rebuild the team without moving a lot of bodies out. That isn't really feasible. They will be lucky to move one of either Smith, Eller and Acciari out. I wouldn't expect more than that if any.
What I do know is it's unreasonable to expect the type of super human effort out of Crosby to carry the team on his back at 37 for 82 games. They can't bring in enough from the outside in limited cap space.
If they are going to spend big they should focus on someone like Reinhart. As they will need a real difference maker to put in the top 6. As they have no chance with the 2nd line performing like it did this year.


I get that that Monahan contract is not ideal, you make a fair point.
The Murashov thing is also valid. I see them kinda splitting the net in the A if need be, but I guess if we wanna commit to Blom at the NHL level, then we can opt to move Jarry or let Ned walk.
11 avr. à 0 h 4
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2024
Messages: 732
Mentions "j'aime": 313
Can we please stop with the Jarry to Detroit threads...
11 avr. à 0 h 5
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 3,345
Mentions "j'aime": 1,184
Quoting: RazorSeider53
Can we please stop with the Jarry to Detroit threads...


Sure thing! I thought he was a clear upgrade over Husso, but I guess not.
11 avr. à 0 h 30
#14
SkateOrDie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 2,347
Mentions "j'aime": 381
Quoting: Marcsnack
I get that that Monahan contract is not ideal, you make a fair point.
The Murashov thing is also valid. I see them kinda splitting the net in the A if need be, but I guess if we wanna commit to Blom at the NHL level, then we can opt to move Jarry or let Ned walk.


I don't think they will split down there.
I think if you look at this year it gives you the road map to next year.

The had Hellberg down there are a mentor to Blom. But Blom got the majority of the starts because they want him to play not sit.
As in playing makes you better.
I think next year is the same issue. Which in some ways makes a 1 year vet goalie coming back make sense. As long as it's cap friendly, but more likely they will find that in FA.

They won't park two young goalies down there to split time. A. it leads to a sort of bad competition and has been something they have avoided repeatedly (usually by trading the young goalie out think Clang), and B. there is no real player reference for help. It's just not best for a young goalies development to only have another young goalie there. Hard to float two and a vet in 72 game seasons.

I think Ned walks this offseason. Pens won't be able to carry that cap hit as he's earned a decent pay day from someone. No harm no foul.
Blom moves up to take his place. Has a mentor in Jarry, and gets the backup starts say 30 or so unless he outplays him than more.
They most likely get a mentor goalie in FA or trade return, from another team as part of cap transfer. They are sent to wbs to help mentor Murashov who I think they would like to play like they did Blom this year, getting 40 some starts.
It's if they both play well, that the issues start. Because soon you are asking why do we need Jarry and can we move him.
Marcsnack a aimé ceci.
11 avr. à 9 h 23
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 3,389
Mentions "j'aime": 1,018
Quoting: Marcsnack
Hard to move Jarry without taking a goalie back. Obviously, I would like to run Blomqvist, but wouldnt mind one more year.


It might be. Just in my opinion, if that's the case, I'd rather keep Jarry - unless the other parts of the package are really good. You could keep Jarry/Ned for basically the same cap hit as you have here(assuming Ned commands that much/they want to pay him that much) - or play Jarry/Blom for a cheaper cap hit. And I think both of those options are better than Ned/Husso considering the Jarry return and cap hits. Just my perspective on it. Goalies are always a gamble though so who knows
Marcsnack a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage