SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Shedding some cap in the offseason

Créé par: NucksnOilers
Équipe: 2024-25 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 7 avr. 2024
Publié: 7 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
What happens if we lose in the 1st or 2nd which I feel like will probably happen

BRING BACK BROWN, he has been so good as of late and we are going to be paying him anyways (him and Perry's bonus are included in his deal)

I genuinely prefer Mcleod as a winger, play him on Drai's line

If Holloway isn't producing by the TDL or mid-season move him with your 25'1st and Bourgault for Buch
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2900 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
14 000 000 $
23 250 000 $
33 250 000 $
14 250 000 $
1950 000 $
44 500 000 $
21 850 000 $
1775 000 $
11 750 000 $
Transactions
1.
EDM
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2024 (PIT)
2.
EDM
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (WSH)
  2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2026 (WSH)
Détails additionnels:
Destinations for Kane where he likely waives to
Washington, St.Louis, Nashville.

All 3 teams are on the edge of competing but are still in a re-stool/rebuild phase where they would look to flip him for picks.
WSH
  1. Kane, Evander
Détails additionnels:
He's going to need to have a massive playoffs to make up for this season. It's not just the injury he just hasn't been a positive to the team.
3.
EDM
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (SEA)
SEA
  1. Broberg, Philip [Droits de RFA]
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de EDM
Logo de SEA
Logo de WSH
Logo de EDM
Logo de PIT
Logo de EDM
Logo de NSH
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
2025
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2026
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de WSH
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2187 700 000 $91 066 667 $3 450 000 $0 $-3 366 667 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, C
RFA
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, C
UFA
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
900 000 $900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
950 000 $950 000 $
AD
UFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 6
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
G
UFA
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
1 850 000 $1 850 000 $
DD
UFA
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, C
UFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
7 avr. à 3 h 34
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 1,822
Mentions "j'aime": 224
You’ll need money to cover Browns bonus - 3 million.

Trading Broberg for nothing - within the division no less - makes no sense.

Other than that, this is pretty good.
NucksnOilers a aimé ceci.
7 avr. à 3 h 43
#2
Démarrer sujet
Save Mcdavid
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 2,898
Mentions "j'aime": 1,253
Quoting: Oilfan1717
You’ll need money to cover Browns bonus - 3 million.

Trading Broberg for nothing - within the division no less - makes no sense.

Other than that, this is pretty good.


As said in the description, Browns bonus is included in his deal that's signed to him.

Broberg will probably be moved, no room in the lineup for him + he's not going to go for more than a 3rd. I picked a random team so it doesn't have to be the Kraken
7 avr. à 3 h 49
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 1,822
Mentions "j'aime": 224
Quoting: NucksnOilers
As said in the description, Browns bonus is included in his deal that's signed to him.

Broberg will probably be moved, no room in the lineup for him + he's not going to go for more than a 3rd. I picked a random team so it doesn't have to be the Kraken


Ahh, I misread that about Brown.

I can’t believe that Broberg has no value - he’s playing very well in the AHL. I think he challenges for a roster spot on the oilers next season.
NucksnOilers a aimé ceci.
7 avr. à 4 h 17
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,284
Mentions "j'aime": 4,684
Quoting: Oilfan1717
Ahh, I misread that about Brown.

I can’t believe that Broberg has no value - he’s playing very well in the AHL. I think he challenges for a roster spot on the oilers next season.


Still he’s an older prospect who hasn’t cracked the NHL lineup yet so his value isn’t where it should be.
NucksnOilers a aimé ceci.
7 avr. à 4 h 20
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,284
Mentions "j'aime": 4,684
Sharks have no use for Ceci unless they can’t find a better top 4 RD in FA. So that deal isn't likely but someone will trade for him at that value.
Picking up Demello is smart to eat some of those tougher min freeing up Bouchard for more offensive situations, and he’s likely cheaper than Roy or Pesce. All in all not a bad lineup and thought process here.
My only argument is it would be nice to move Kulak, give Broberg a legit shot and have a little cap room say 1-1.15 mil for injuries.
NucksnOilers a aimé ceci.
7 avr. à 4 h 28
#6
Démarrer sujet
Save Mcdavid
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 2,898
Mentions "j'aime": 1,253
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
Sharks have no use for Ceci unless they can’t find a better top 4 RD in FA. So that deal isn't likely but someone will trade for him at that value.
Picking up Demello is smart to eat some of those tougher min freeing up Bouchard for more offensive situations, and he’s likely cheaper than Roy or Pesce. All in all not a bad lineup and thought process here.
My only argument is it would be nice to move Kulak, give Broberg a legit shot and have a little cap room say 1-1.15 mil for injuries.


The only issue with moving Kulak is if we are moving him we are losing his veteran presence on that back-end, he's been good in the playoffs for us and I would feel good having him in there rather than risking it with Broberg. I like the idea for having 1-1.15 in cap for injuries but in that case I'd let Foegele walk and give Lavoie a chance in the middle 6 to see if he can match his production
7 avr. à 7 h 8
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 2,477
Mentions "j'aime": 1,611
EDM is so much better of just keeping Broberg if the return is in the late-2nd to 3rd range.
CD282 et Oilfan1717 a aimé ceci.
7 avr. à 9 h 32
#8
Skip skibbity
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 2,244
Mentions "j'aime": 872
The is zero need for the Caps to get Kane
7 avr. à 10 h 50
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,094
Mentions "j'aime": 7,773
You traded all 3 players for less than their FMV, trading Broberg and keeping Kulak doesn't follow your theme of moving cap. Ned isn't better than Pickard, DeMelo is slower than Ceci, I'm not convinced Hakanpaa is any better than Desharnais.
7 avr. à 11 h 26
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2024
Messages: 52
Mentions "j'aime": 12
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
Sharks have no use for Ceci unless they can’t find a better top 4 RD in FA. So that deal isn't likely but someone will trade for him at that value.
Picking up Demello is smart to eat some of those tougher min freeing up Bouchard for more offensive situations, and he’s likely cheaper than Roy or Pesce. All in all not a bad lineup and thought process here.
My only argument is it would be nice to move Kulak, give Broberg a legit shot and have a little cap room say 1-1.15 mil for injuries.


Is it bad that I was thinking — how can the sharks get the contract more in the $2 to $2.5 million range so he could be a flip?

I really don’t know what we (sharks) are going to do in Defense. We need help now to help with development, but more vets take up spots for younger players. We need to find a way to trade cap dumps —- Vlasic for cap dump forward. Those no trade moves are going to make that hard.

Having Ceci and Rutta gives you two RD on UFA to trade. We do have 2 4th, 6th, and 7th in 2025 to pay off a banker teams to help move some of these low return trade pieces.
Oilfan1717 et NucksnOilers a aimé ceci.
7 avr. à 12 h 17
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,284
Mentions "j'aime": 4,684
Quoting: Swusc1026
Is it bad that I was thinking — how can the sharks get the contract more in the $2 to $2.5 million range so he could be a flip?

I really don’t know what we (sharks) are going to do in Defense. We need help now to help with development, but more vets take up spots for younger players. We need to find a way to trade cap dumps —- Vlasic for cap dump forward. Those no trade moves are going to make that hard.

Having Ceci and Rutta gives you two RD on UFA to trade. We do have 2 4th, 6th, and 7th in 2025 to pay off a banker teams to help move some of these low return trade pieces.


Vlasic is likely still here next year and maybe bought out in his final year or Sharks let his deal play out, they need to focus on getting younger higher ceiling top 4 guys… but those are usually only grabbed in Draft or by giving up a hefty price. I’m not 100% sure what the sharks do honestly.
NucksnOilers a aimé ceci.
7 avr. à 14 h 57
#12
Démarrer sujet
Save Mcdavid
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 2,898
Mentions "j'aime": 1,253
Quoting: CD282
You traded all 3 players for less than their FMV, trading Broberg and keeping Kulak doesn't follow your theme of moving cap. Ned isn't better than Pickard, DeMelo is slower than Ceci, I'm not convinced Hakanpaa is any better than Desharnais.


I'm sorry but especially if we bow out early in the playoffs absolutely no one is taking Kane or Ceci for more than the prices I suggested. Both have been dark spots in the lineup at times this year and would be big parts of our playoff exit. Demelo brings so so so much more stability over Ceci, Josh Morriesy in Winnipeg completely transformed his game once he was paired with Demelo. Demelo is not only better than Ceci but would make Nurse so so much better. He would be such an upgrade for us. Hakanpaa is just in the scenario where Desharnais is priced out of our range to 2 million + which I believe he will be. Pickard has been good but I just have the personal preference of Ned, he's shown more flashes of being a 1B while Pickard has just been a backup. If we get into the playoffs we are going to need someone like Kulak on the bottom pairing, he has been so good for us the last couple years when need be and it would be great to continue that. I don't know if I trust Broberg to be that kind of guy in the playoffs for us, maybe it is better to keep him but I think we move him and that's what his value is
7 avr. à 19 h 27
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,094
Mentions "j'aime": 7,773
Quoting: NucksnOilers
I'm sorry but especially if we bow out early in the playoffs absolutely no one is taking Kane or Ceci for more than the prices I suggested. Both have been dark spots in the lineup at times this year and would be big parts of our playoff exit.


So much speculation! tears of joy
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage