SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Offseason Turnover

Créé par: Letsgosharks
Équipe: 2024-25 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 23 mars 2024
Publié: 29 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Just for fun. Trying to make a harder, tougher team to play against.

Stephenson signing isn’t necessarily a panic signing, but it’s assuming Couture cannot come back.

This also does not take into account San Jose’s 2024 draft class

This probably does not get Lundell, but what would?
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3950 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
1950 000 $
34 250 000 $
53 750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
46 250 000 $
44 000 000 $
2950 000 $
37 250 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Goodrow, Barclay
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (NYR)
Détails additionnels:
Lets say this is 30+OA, so they are willing to use it to dump Goodrow
NYR
    Rights to Barabanov
    2.
    TOR
    1. Kunin, Luke [Droits de RFA]
    2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (TBL)
    3. Choix de 5e ronde en 2024 (PIT)
    3.
    SJS
    1. Lundell, Anton [Droits de RFA]
    FLA
    1. Addison, Calen
    2. Chmelevski, Alexander [Liste de réserve]
    3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (NYR)
    4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (NJD)
    4.
    SJS
    1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2024 (FLA)
    2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2025 (FLA)
    Détails additionnels:
    Somewhere for cheap
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Enfoui
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2024
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de FLA
    Logo de SJS
    2025
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de WPG
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de FLA
    Logo de NJD
    2026
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2487 500 000 $72 901 667 $0 $1 307 500 $14 598 333 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
    C, AG
    RFA
    7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    AG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
    AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    C, AG
    RFA
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    950 000 $950 000 $
    C
    RFA
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    3 641 667 $3 641 667 $
    C, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    950 000 $950 000 $
    AD
    UFA
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 2
    6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
    DD
    UFA
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 350 000 $2 350 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    DG
    RFA
    3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
    DD
    RFA
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
    DG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    DD
    RFA
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    828 333 $828 333 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
    AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    29 mars à 11 h 50
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2021
    Messages: 594
    Mentions "j'aime": 232
    I mean I think that’s a good offer for Lundell, but I’m a sharks fan.

    Probably not enough for Liljegren, even taking on Reaves.

    Don’t think NY is goin to pay to dump Goodrow.

    No UFAs are signing in SJ unless it’s a significant overpay in both years and AAV.
    29 mars à 12 h 3
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2024
    Messages: 508
    Mentions "j'aime": 220
    Very, very, very easy NO from the Rangers. Not using a 1st round pick to trade Goodrow.
    Fox_Czar_Cup a aimé ceci.
    29 mars à 12 h 5
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2019
    Messages: 2,105
    Mentions "j'aime": 720
    Panthers decline if they do trade lundell it’s for a similar trade as midlestad so would need to be a good dman coming back Addison is definitely not that
    Letsgosharks a aimé ceci.
    29 mars à 12 h 6
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2021
    Messages: 5,434
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,386
    Do people not realize Goodrow has a very friendly buyout contract lol
    Hans_berg03 et Fox_Czar_Cup a aimé ceci.
    29 mars à 13 h 24
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 8,303
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,712
    I wouldn’t give all that up for Lundell, he’s a 3C
    Letsgosharks a aimé ceci.
    29 mars à 15 h 2
    #6
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2021
    Messages: 1,283
    Mentions "j'aime": 662
    Quoting: DFinn91
    I mean I think that’s a good offer for Lundell, but I’m a sharks fan.

    Probably not enough for Liljegren, even taking on Reaves.

    Don’t think NY is goin to pay to dump Goodrow.

    No UFAs are signing in SJ unless it’s a significant overpay in both years and AAV.


    The only reason I had the goodrow trade was for the lundell trade because I don’t want to give up the pit first

    I thought I was overpaying on Stephenson a little, I guess not
    29 mars à 15 h 2
    #7
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2021
    Messages: 1,283
    Mentions "j'aime": 662
    Quoting: glarson17
    I wouldn’t give all that up for Lundell, he’s a 3C


    Honestly if we had the chance to get a guy like lundell i think it would make sense to
    29 mars à 15 h 3
    #8
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2021
    Messages: 1,283
    Mentions "j'aime": 662
    Quoting: Hockey91
    Panthers decline if they do trade lundell it’s for a similar trade as midlestad so would need to be a good dman coming back Addison is definitely not that


    Lundell is on a down year and hasn’t had quite the impact Middlestadt has, but I get where ur coming from
    29 mars à 18 h 10
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2019
    Messages: 2,105
    Mentions "j'aime": 720
    Quoting: Letsgosharks
    Lundell is on a down year and hasn’t had quite the impact Middlestadt has, but I get where ur coming from


    He had a bad start but he’s probably got like 20 point in his last 35 games and playing way better now while still playing 3rd line minutes and no pp time But I see no reason for panthers to trade him for a draft pick. He should take a smaller bridge contract.
    Letsgosharks a aimé ceci.
    29 mars à 19 h 24
    #10
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2021
    Messages: 1,283
    Mentions "j'aime": 662
    Quoting: Hockey91
    He had a bad start but he’s probably got like 20 point in his last 35 games and playing way better now while still playing 3rd line minutes and no pp time But I see no reason for panthers to trade him for a draft pick. He should take a smaller bridge contract.


    Gotcha, it was more or less a cap casualty trade if your gm decides to keep reinhart and montour on bigger deals

    I could just see someone try to offersheet Lundell if he is only offered or has space for 2ish mill
    29 mars à 19 h 28
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2019
    Messages: 2,105
    Mentions "j'aime": 720
    Quoting: Letsgosharks
    Gotcha, it was more or less a cap casualty trade if your gm decides to keep reinhart and montour on bigger deals

    I could just see someone try to offersheet Lundell if he is only offered or has space for 2ish mill

    It would have to be over the 5 million one which is I think a first and third or whatever. But it’s possible. But I’d rather keep him then resign Reinhart to an9 mil contract. He’s great and all but one fantastic season isn’t worth all that.
    29 mars à 19 h 32
    #12
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2021
    Messages: 1,283
    Mentions "j'aime": 662
    Quoting: Hockey91
    It would have to be over the 5 million one which is I think a first and third or whatever. But it’s possible. But I’d rather keep him then resign Reinhart to an9 mil contract. He’s great and all but one fantastic season isn’t worth all that.


    10000% I think it makes more sense to keep Lundell, in the summer, I will be praying you guys don't and ship him to san jose tho hahaha
    Hockey91 a aimé ceci.
    29 mars à 19 h 43
    #13
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2017
    Messages: 87
    Mentions "j'aime": 16
    Quoting: Rags21
    Do people not realize Goodrow has a very friendly buyout contract lol


    Lol how would fans of other teams know this? Only NYR fans have looked it up.
    29 mars à 20 h 18
    #14
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2021
    Messages: 5,434
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,386
    Quoting: mcpeach2
    Lol how would fans of other teams know this? Only NYR fans have looked it up.


    Pretty much every single trade that involves dumping goodrow with a 1st has been answered back with a buyout

    Goodrow buyout is super friendly and a no brainer
    31 mars à 11 h 8
    #15
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2017
    Messages: 87
    Mentions "j'aime": 16
    Quoting: Rags21
    Pretty much every single trade that involves dumping goodrow with a 1st has been answered back with a buyout

    Goodrow buyout is super friendly and a no brainer


    I agree, im a NYR fan and I know that, but fans of other teams dont
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage