Gudas isn’t available. He’s an absolutely perfect fit in ANA, and there are very few players on our team where we can say that

Anaheim would be interested in adding John Marino to Radko Gudas, not exchanging them. We're short in the RhD department.

Certainly not getting you Gudas, that is if he was even available which he is not

Devils absolutely declines, Marino's better than Gudas

ALL players over 30 are 100% available on rebuilding teams like the Ducks. This is especially realistic, when adding John Marino who has almost the same AAV for cap, but an additional year & is younger. Than, add in the D prospect & draft pick it is a very very realistic trade as Marino has 1 of the worse Goal Differentials, had just 1 great season last yr. when NJ tied their Franchises Best Season & Gudas is Top5 in Hits & Top25 in Blocks he is someone NJ def. would trade for. BET💯

You missed the point because you weren't listening. We aren't trading one RD for another when we only have one RD.

They never listen

Incorrect, I clearly rebutted your foolish comment. It is you who did not listen. Read what I said & answer this:
Are the Ducks a rebuilding team?
Is Gudas over 30 years old?
Is Gudas a RD?
Is Marino an RD?
Is John Marino younger than Gudas?
Is Marino's contract longer than Gudas'?
Are the AAV's of both Gudas & Marino 400k apart?

Now, if you know how to read, or comprehend what I had to break down in elementart format for you, then you would understand the Ducks would 100% trade Gudas for Marino.
¹They don't lose a RD
²There 2nd Pair RD gets younger
³They lock in their 2nd Pair RD for 1yr. longer.
⁴They aquire draft pick
⁵They aquire prospect (Who guess what? He is a RD too. Not that it matters because this summer ANA can add another RD & a Gudas trade would be seperate, as gaining assets & STILL having a 2nd pair RD does not effect ANA lacking Right handed D men, duh.

Clueless.

None of the items (I won't call them "points" because they're meaningless) are relevant to Anaheim.

Don't lecture other teams' fans on what their teams would do. It makes you look unbelievably inexperienced.

All 6 of us dyed-in-the-wool Anaheim stalwarts could repeat that (1) it makes no sense for us to trade one RhD for another, and (2) Gudas has intangible qualities that outweigh his on-ice talents, and he wouldn't hear us because he's impervious to input. It's what the political commentators call "confirmation bias."

You're ignorant & clueless of hockey knowledge. I've proven time & time again how much more I know than silly rabbits like you. GET SMARTER! Bye.