SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Could Stolarz be another Anderson

Créé par: thekingof8
Équipe: 2024-25 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 24 mars 2024
Publié: 27 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Well, could he be?
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2900 000 $
2900 000 $
44 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
55 500 000 $
1900 000 $
22 000 000 $
12 000 000 $
33 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
OTT
  1. Bonk, Oliver
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (COL)
2.
OTT
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2024 (SJS)
3.
OTT
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (MIN)
MIN
  1. Brännström, Erik [Droits de RFA]
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de OTT
Logo de BOS
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de DET
Logo de FLA
Logo de TBL
Logo de OTT
Logo de SJS
2025
Logo de OTT
Logo de COL
Logo de OTT
Logo de MIN
Logo de OTT
Logo de FLA
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
2026
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2287 500 000 $85 899 047 $850 000 $0 $1 600 953 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 205 714 $8 205 714 $
AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 350 000 $8 350 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
7 950 000 $7 950 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
C
RFA
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 975 000 $4 975 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
900 000 $900 000 $
AG
RFA
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
900 000 $900 000 $
AG
RFA
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 050 000 $8 050 000 $
DG
UFA - 8
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
UFA
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
805 000 $805 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
900 000 $900 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 mars à 5 h 13
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2023
Messages: 182
Mentions "j'aime": 99
Bonk is not moving, but I could see them moving Grans with FLA 1st or COL 1st, if they really like Chychrun and can agree extension.
27 mars à 5 h 20
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 315
Mentions "j'aime": 123
You ain't getting Bonk.
27 mars à 7 h 7
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 5,896
Mentions "j'aime": 1,532
Quoting: Ujeje
Bonk is not moving, but I could see them moving Grans with FLA 1st or COL 1st, if they really like Chychrun and can agree extension.


that wont get chych. to get you must give. crap dont get you a top 4 dman
27 mars à 7 h 54
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2023
Messages: 182
Mentions "j'aime": 99
Quoting: athrin
that wont get chych. to get you must give. crap dont get you a top 4 dman


I know you gotta give to get, but Philly ain't in position where they would/should give two firsts for pending UFA. There is no guarantee if he'd even want to extend for a rebuilding team.

But like I said in another thread, if there's extension in place, Grans + 3rd/4th + either -24 FLA 1st or -25 COL 1st would be something Briere could do, then it's up to Sens if they take it or leave it. Can be Attard if he is more interesting than Grans.

Bonk is out of that trade.
27 mars à 8 h 2
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 5,896
Mentions "j'aime": 1,532
Quoting: Ujeje
I know you gotta give to get, but Philly ain't in position where they would/should give two firsts for pending UFA. There is no guarantee if he'd even want to extend for a rebuilding team.

But like I said in another thread, if there's extension in place, Grans + 3rd/4th + either -24 FLA 1st or -25 COL 1st would be something Briere could do, then it's up to Sens if they take it or leave it. Can be Attard if he is more interesting than Grans.

Bonk is out of that trade.


is philly rebuilding or retooling, if rebuild then they should have zero interest in chych, if retooling then they would be interested.

phily not getting chych for a meh prospect in grans and a late first
27 mars à 8 h 32
#6
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,770
Mentions "j'aime": 22,800
Chychrun isn't worth all that for one year (and please no extension nonsense)
Roy isn't signing with the Sens........he will much better options
27 mars à 8 h 42
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,111
Mentions "j'aime": 771
Philly won’t send us bonk, too valuable after the season he’s had. Cates + Col 1st and maybe another smaller piece and I’d do it. I’d love to sign Roy but I’d also love DeMelo back! I really like Brossoit but Stolarz is good too!
SadSensFan14 a aimé ceci.
27 mars à 9 h 11
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2023
Messages: 182
Mentions "j'aime": 99
Quoting: athrin
is philly rebuilding or retooling, if rebuild then they should have zero interest in chych, if retooling then they would be interested.

phily not getting chych for a meh prospect in grans and a late first


Rebuild is the term they have been using, "too bad" the team is performing WAY better than expected, so personally I'm leaning to retooling.

And while you think that 1st + 3rd or 4th + Grans (value probably somewhere between 50-70 ovr) would be low balling offer, you paid 1st (which was supposed to be later than 12th ovr) + two 2nds for possible 3 playoff runs with reasonable cap hit. He's not returning the same value anymore as he's pending UFA looking for a career contract. And Flyers shouldn't be sacrificing lots of futures to acquire him. If it's not enough then so be it.

Quoting: palhal
Chychrun isn't worth all that for one year (and please no extension nonsense)
Roy isn't signing with the Sens........he will much better options


He's worth a 1st +, even as a rental for team needing him. Not sure if Flyers is the team in need right now and I'm not saying I want him, but rumours say that there was interest on Flyers' side and I don't think they were looking for a rental. Chychrun with extension would most likely mean trading one D for C. At least when they feel Bonk is ready for regular minutes.
SadSensFan14 et Borocop a aimé ceci.
27 mars à 11 h 37
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 5,896
Mentions "j'aime": 1,532
Quoting: Ujeje
Rebuild is the term they have been using, "too bad" the team is performing WAY better than expected, so personally I'm leaning to retooling.

And while you think that 1st + 3rd or 4th + Grans (value probably somewhere between 50-70 ovr) would be low balling offer, you paid 1st (which was supposed to be later than 12th ovr) + two 2nds for possible 3 playoff runs with reasonable cap hit. He's not returning the same value anymore as he's pending UFA looking for a career contract. And Flyers shouldn't be sacrificing lots of futures to acquire him. If it's not enough then so be it.



He's worth a 1st +, even as a rental for team needing him. Not sure if Flyers is the team in need right now and I'm not saying I want him, but rumours say that there was interest on Flyers' side and I don't think they were looking for a rental. Chychrun with extension would most likely mean trading one D for C. At least when they feel Bonk is ready for regular minutes.


OTT underpaid for chych, EVERYONE on the planet said so at the time . every single analyst on ever single platform
27 mars à 13 h 12
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2023
Messages: 182
Mentions "j'aime": 99
Quoting: athrin
OTT underpaid for chych, EVERYONE on the planet said so at the time . every single analyst on ever single platform


True also, mostly because Arizona didn't want to take any bad contract in return. But was a good trade for OTT, I give you that.

But that still doesn't answer that why should anyone be paying more than that? Back then he had over 2 years, 3 playoff runs left on his contract with reasonable cap hit. Now it's one year left for pending UFA looking for a career contract. Just an example:

Noah Hanifin (50% retained, pending UFA) <-> most likely lateish 1st, Miromanov + conditional 3rd ( might become 2nd), was considered good for both, A for Vegas because Flyers is retaining another 25% for 4th.

Yes, was a deadline deal and Hanifin didn't want to extend to Calgary. Chychrun is about the same level player as Hanifin, you don't know if he wants to stay there.

I said that late 1st, Grans (a lot more valuable than Miromanov) + 3rd is closer than top prospect + late first. Without retention.
27 mars à 13 h 45
#11
HockeyLeagueThreads
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 552
Mentions "j'aime": 347
Why even buy out Hamonic if you have close to 3 mil in cap space still? It just eats away cap unnecessarily for the year after.
27 mars à 14 h 4
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 5,896
Mentions "j'aime": 1,532
Quoting: Ujeje
True also, mostly because Arizona didn't want to take any bad contract in return. But was a good trade for OTT, I give you that.

But that still doesn't answer that why should anyone be paying more than that? Back then he had over 2 years, 3 playoff runs left on his contract with reasonable cap hit. Now it's one year left for pending UFA looking for a career contract. Just an example:

Noah Hanifin (50% retained, pending UFA) <-> most likely lateish 1st, Miromanov + conditional 3rd ( might become 2nd), was considered good for both, A for Vegas because Flyers is retaining another 25% for 4th.

Yes, was a deadline deal and Hanifin didn't want to extend to Calgary. Chychrun is about the same level player as Hanifin, you don't know if he wants to stay there.

I said that late 1st, Grans (a lot more valuable than Miromanov) + 3rd is closer than top prospect + late first. Without retention.


chych himself has said he would like to stay in OTT several times so OTT can just resign him if they do not get what they want for him, also hanifin was traded as a rental, Chych would not be unless it is at the deadline but any chych trade will come in the off season.also this was a buyers market this trade deadline so prices for players was lower than normal.
27 mars à 14 h 37
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2023
Messages: 182
Mentions "j'aime": 99
Quoting: athrin
chych himself has said he would like to stay in OTT several times so OTT can just resign him if they do not get what they want for him, also hanifin was traded as a rental, Chych would not be unless it is at the deadline but any chych trade will come in the off season.also this was a buyers market this trade deadline so prices for players was lower than normal.


Chychrun is a rental unless there is agreed extension in place during the trade. He's pending UFA, just as Hanifin, only timing (off season vs TDL) would be different, acquiring team would just have more time to negotiate the extension. But we will see which one of us is closer to right value IF he gets traded. I still say that it'll be somewhere around 1st, B-prospect and 3rd, might be even 2nd if there is multiple teams wanting him.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage