SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Rolling in Dough

Créé par: Missouri
Équipe: 2024-25 Predators de Nashville
Date de création initiale: 15 mars 2024
Publié: 25 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This is a simulated result of what trades/signings were made in our GHL GM League for a simulated off-season.

GM's were tasked with the job of getting their team ready for the season. They had to stay within the salary cap restrictions and must have a maximum of 6 players on the Taxi Squad for injury relief purposes.

Your job is to comment and evaluate how the GM managed their team.

Questions to answer:
1. What was the best move made by the GM?
2. What was the worst move made by the GM?
3. Did the GM improve the team or make them worse?

Thank you for playing! Our GHL GM League is played for a couple of months then posted on CapFriendly for everyone to see the results made by the GM's!
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2950 000 $
22 500 000 $
3800 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
52 800 000 $
3800 000 $
3800 000 $
36 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
NSH
  1. Smith, Reilly
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2026 (PIT)
PIT
  1. Lauzon, Jérémy
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (NSH)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2026 (NSH)
2.
NSH
  1. Boqvist, Adam (1 000 000 $ retained)
CBJ
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (NSH)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de TBL
Logo de WPG
Logo de NSH
Logo de DAL
Logo de NSH
Logo de CHI
Logo de EDM
2025
Logo de NSH
Logo de TBL
Logo de NSH
Logo de COL
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
2026
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de PIT
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2388 000 000 $87 479 199 $0 $932 500 $520 801 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Predators de Nashville
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Predators de Nashville
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Predators de Nashville
3 185 000 $3 185 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Logo de Predators de Nashville
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Predators de Nashville
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, AD
RFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
797 500 $797 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Predators de Nashville
950 000 $950 000 $
C
RFA
Logo de Predators de Nashville
2 857 143 $2 857 143 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Predators de Nashville
9 059 000 $9 059 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Predators de Nashville
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Predators de Nashville
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Predators de Nashville
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
DD
UFA
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Predators de Nashville
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Predators de Nashville
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Predators de Nashville
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
RFA
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Predators de Nashville
800 000 $800 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, C
RFA
Logo de Predators de Nashville
775 000 $775 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
800 000 $800 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD
RFA
Logo de Predators de Nashville
775 000 $775 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Predators de Nashville
800 000 $800 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA
Logo de Predators de Nashville
800 000 $800 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
25 mars à 15 h 26
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 854
Mentions "j'aime": 441
All in all, not a bad job.

1. Best move made: Securing Carrier to that deal. Carrier has been a rockstar defensively for NSH and the deal and term are honestly great imo and it solidifies the right side so NSH can continue looking for a true 1st pair RD.

2. Worst move made: The Reilly Smith deal. This deal is honestly less than ideal. Nothing against Smith, but the issue is the contract. If NSH was to go out and get Teravainen, then I'd rather fill in that gap either with another free agency move or internally with someone like L'Heureux, who has had a monster 1st season in the AHL and could compete for significantly cheaper and not have to give up assets and that much cap space for someone who doesn't have a long term spot on the team.

Overall: the team is improved, but not really in a way that I think would be best for the team long-term
Missouri a aimé ceci.
25 mars à 16 h 10
#2
Démarrer sujet
Retired V2 V3 GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 3,617
Mentions "j'aime": 1,142
Quoting: AEcho
All in all, not a bad job.

1. Best move made: Securing Carrier to that deal. Carrier has been a rockstar defensively for NSH and the deal and term are honestly great imo and it solidifies the right side so NSH can continue looking for a true 1st pair RD.

2. Worst move made: The Reilly Smith deal. This deal is honestly less than ideal. Nothing against Smith, but the issue is the contract. If NSH was to go out and get Teravainen, then I'd rather fill in that gap either with another free agency move or internally with someone like L'Heureux, who has had a monster 1st season in the AHL and could compete for significantly cheaper and not have to give up assets and that much cap space for someone who doesn't have a long term spot on the team.

Overall: the team is improved, but not really in a way that I think would be best for the team long-term


Thanks for the comments! Yeah my personal opinion is the signings done by the GM were good, but the trades were pretty bad in my opinion. Well not necessarily bad, just not ideal like you said for Nashville.
25 mars à 17 h 30
#3
mostly harmless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 6,757
Mentions "j'aime": 3,249
Whoever's running the CBJ in your game did not do a very good job with that deal. IRL Boqvist would cost more than that; he was actually doing pretty well alongside Werenski and on the power play before he got injured yet again. Should be "at least a 2nd, more if you want retention" or thereabouts.
CaseyFlyman, benjgc et Missouri a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage