SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Offseason Series - Ducks

Créé par: Cabbie91
Équipe: 2024-25 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 19 mars 2024
Publié: 19 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
- Ducks draft one of Levshunov
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3950 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
42 500 000 $
1800 000 $
11 000 000 $
2900 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1900 000 $
23 000 000 $
Transactions
STL
  1. LaCombe, Jackson [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (SJS)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de ANA
Logo de EDM
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de ANA
Logo de PIT
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2025
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de TOR
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de EDM
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2026
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2387 500 000 $69 369 167 $0 $6 550 000 $18 130 833 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 6
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 250 000 $$3M)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 650 000 $3 650 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C, AG
RFA
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
800 000 $800 000 $
C
RFA
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance800 000 $$800K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
812 500 $812 500 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
844 167 $844 167 $
DG
RFA - 2
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
UFA
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG/DD
RFA
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
900 000 $900 000 $
C
RFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
19 mars à 9 h 40
#1
Xercuses
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 13,506
Mentions "j'aime": 3,616
I wouldnt be against it but id rather trade krug first
19 mars à 10 h 14
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,756
Mentions "j'aime": 992
Sure
19 mars à 10 h 35
#3
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,696
Mentions "j'aime": 11,490
Mmm I dunno. If Faulk continues showing he's 100% fit again, I don't love it or hate it. A little worried about Lacombe's D zone work, but he is still developing. Maybe hold the phone until summer.
19 mars à 11 h 17
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,065
Mentions "j'aime": 760
Max Jones and Brett Leason are both better than Greer.

Hakanpaa isn't a signing that will happen because that's Tristan Luneau's spot to lose next camp. If the kid can't hack it full time they'll pluck a guy off waivers again (aka Gus Lindstrom).
19 mars à 11 h 43
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 2,877
Mentions "j'aime": 1,465
I worry about how we'd replace Faulk. I think it's more ideal to shop Krug as he's replaceable. The issue with offseason speculation in a deal like this is the market for RHD is pretty barren as is. If this were a draft day trade I could see how it could work out favorably for the Blues. But if it were to be afterwards, I don't know if you can really feel comfortable with Kessel as a speculative 2RHD going into a season. Alot can obviously change, and I get the general idea behind it is trying to clear out some spots on defense while getting a prospect. But it further log jams our 2/3/depth LHD situation while creating a bigger hole. It's may be a necessity that has to be lived with though.
19 mars à 13 h 4
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,756
Mentions "j'aime": 992
Quoting: AC14
I worry about how we'd replace Faulk. I think it's more ideal to shop Krug as he's replaceable. The issue with offseason speculation in a deal like this is the market for RHD is pretty barren as is. If this were a draft day trade I could see how it could work out favorably for the Blues. But if it were to be afterwards, I don't know if you can really feel comfortable with Kessel as a speculative 2RHD going into a season. Alot can obviously change, and I get the general idea behind it is trying to clear out some spots on defense while getting a prospect. But it further log jams our 2/3/depth LHD situation while creating a bigger hole. It's may be a necessity that has to be lived with though.


LeCombe can play right side. I agree more ideal to trade Krug but also harder to do so
19 mars à 13 h 7
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 2,877
Mentions "j'aime": 1,465
Quoting: noted
LeCombe can play right side. I agree more ideal to trade Krug but also harder to do so


Can he play it well enough to be a productive RD2? I like what Kessel has shown, but i also liked what Tucker shhowed last year. It's too early to put all the chips on him into being a top 4 guy. I'm very comfortable with him paired with Krug in more of a 3rd pair role though. I'm just not sure I'm comfortable with Lacombe and whomever we'd have to sign to be a top 4 pair
19 mars à 13 h 10
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,756
Mentions "j'aime": 992
Quoting: AC14
Can he play it well enough to be a productive RD2? I like what Kessel has shown, but i also liked what Tucker shhowed last year. It's too early to put all the chips on him into being a top 4 guy. I'm very comfortable with him paired with Krug in more of a 3rd pair role though. I'm just not sure I'm comfortable with Lacombe and whomever we'd have to sign to be a top 4 pair


Something needs to change with the def in my opinion. Faulk still doesn’t look like himself after coming back from injury. I like Kessel more than others though probably and think he can hold down 2 spot
19 mars à 15 h 34
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,065
Mentions "j'aime": 760
Quoting: AC14
Can he play it well enough to be a productive RD2?


When LaCombe hits his peak, maybe. Right now definitely not (IMO). For a lot of the early parts of the season the Ducks threw the kid out on the right side of the top pair with Fowler and the pair struggled to say the least. The analytics of both are pretty brutal because of it.

They stopped doing that when it became obvious that it wasn't working. From the mid point of the season roughly LaCombe has played mostly the left side and they cut his minutes back. He's looked better in a more appropriate usage for his current development. I would say he still plays too many minutes in a lot of games. 25 against Minnesota a couple games back for example, but that's a function of the whole team being complete ass in that game.
19 mars à 22 h 18
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 164
Mentions "j'aime": 71
Quoting: noted
LeCombe can play right side. I agree more ideal to trade Krug but also harder to do so


Quoting: AC14
Can he play it well enough to be a productive RD2? I like what Kessel has shown, but i also liked what Tucker shhowed last year. It's too early to put all the chips on him into being a top 4 guy. I'm very comfortable with him paired with Krug in more of a 3rd pair role though. I'm just not sure I'm comfortable with Lacombe and whomever we'd have to sign to be a top 4 pair


He can play the right, he did it in college, but this year he has played way better on the left (part of that too though is how terrible most of the Ducks D has been). He has played his best hockey paired with Gudas. He struggled a bit at the start of the season playing pretty much exclusively on the right with Fowler, so for a still developing defensemen, I probably wouldn't advise playing him on the right side
noted a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage