SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Bruins ideal roster imo for 24-25

Créé par: dons_weeney
Équipe: 2024-25 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 9 mars 2024
Publié: 9 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This is perfect imo. Center depth is now excellent, still not high end, but 3 really solid centers and then Zacha can rotate in if needed. Beecher is a solid 4C as well. Lysell is likely making the team next year. Looks ready now, but not the time to experiment. He's stayed healthy and looks better in Prov.

Lindholm is of course a free agency signing, so it's gonna be a bigger contract that I'd like. Realistically, 6.5m x 5 years is what he's worth, but 7x7 is fine by me. It's better than not having a 1c. Not sure a super high end 1c is quite as necessary given they have Pasta in his prime.

Debrusk should fit back in nicely as a versatile winger, with offensive upside. Defensive game is excellent, so offense is just a bonus imo. Barbashev's 5x5 is a realistic comp contract.

I hate moving on from Ullmark, and honestly if they did want to keep him, they could. Trading him could potentially land them a center, but who knows what's out there for centers. A first round pick seems reasonable as a return, or an equivalent prospect.

Lohrei is the only somewhat of a question mark, IMO it's best to take the risk and just let him take on this role. Every team has a question mark somewhere and I'm totally fine with some growing pains. I wouldn't want to sign another top 4LD to a big contract and get stuck with that and be at the cap. Taking advantage of his ELC is def worth it.

But having a more "complete" lineup, signing parts of the core long term, and adding Lindholm is a great start. Not to mention actually having cap space.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1800 000 $
77 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
77 500 000 $
65 000 000 $
1800 000 $
Transactions
BOS
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (NJD)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de NJD
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2025
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2026
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2287 500 000 $83 204 167 $50 000 $542 500 $4 295 833 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA
Logo de Bruins de Boston
11 250 000 $11 250 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
870 000 $870 000 $ (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Logo de Bruins de Boston
787 500 $787 500 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $$250K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
G
RFA
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG
NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
G
RFA
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
9 mars à 19 h 44
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 374
Mentions "j'aime": 168
This first round pick has a reasonable chance of landing in the top-10. One year of Ullmark isn’t worth that imo.
9 mars à 20 h 21
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 4,343
Mentions "j'aime": 1,341
Think Devils hang onto 2024 1st at this point. Devils would be more willing to part with their 2025 1st. My offer would be Bahl, Schmid, 2025 1st for Ullmark with 5x6 extension attached
9 mars à 20 h 41
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,881
Mentions "j'aime": 1,198
Modifié 9 mars à 20 h 49
My guess is the Bruins make him available for the best pick combination among the teams not on his no trade list to replenish the 2024 draft picks unless they formally decide PLD and Ullmark revisits because of an extension

You could ask him if he’s open to certain markets if an extension can be agreed to.

Any New Jersey deal would start with the Montreal 2nd round pick. If Seamus Casey is someone the Bruins like, he’d be interesting.
9 mars à 20 h 43
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,861
Mentions "j'aime": 8,867
Zacha is a natural center. He’s better at center than wing. Winning 55% of faceoffs. Moving him to wing makes zero sense.

Another reason why chasing Elias is not really the right move.
9 mars à 20 h 56
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,881
Mentions "j'aime": 1,198
Quoting: Gofnut999
Zacha is a natural center. He’s better at center than wing. Winning 55% of faceoffs. Moving him to wing makes zero sense.

Another reason why chasing Elias is not really the right move.


His overall efficiency stats were much better last year vs this year. I’m completely OK keeping him at center if that’s the right decision, but I do believe Boston pursuing Lindholm from Calgary and Vancouver suggests that Sweeney isn’t sold yet.
9 mars à 21 h 1
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,583
Mentions "j'aime": 18,488
How about Chandler Stephenson…since VGK got Hertl
9 mars à 21 h 16
#7
Démarrer sujet
Best armchair GM yet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 593
Mentions "j'aime": 139
Quoting: DevilsFanInTX
This first round pick has a reasonable chance of landing in the top-10. One year of Ullmark isn’t worth that imo.


Gives time to re-sign. And B's could add more depending on the draft. Ullmark def wants to be east/north, so I'd bet he'd resign.
9 mars à 21 h 17
#8
Démarrer sujet
Best armchair GM yet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 593
Mentions "j'aime": 139
Quoting: Devsfan25
Think Devils hang onto 2024 1st at this point. Devils would be more willing to part with their 2025 1st. My offer would be Bahl, Schmid, 2025 1st for Ullmark with 5x6 extension attached


That's fair too, I'd take that IF they do decide to move Ullmark and already have a center.
9 mars à 21 h 18
#9
Démarrer sujet
Best armchair GM yet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 593
Mentions "j'aime": 139
Quoting: Gofnut999
Zacha is a natural center. He’s better at center than wing. Winning 55% of faceoffs. Moving him to wing makes zero sense.

Another reason why chasing Elias is not really the right move.


Agreed, Coyle can play wing too, but I do think it's still worth adding Lindholm because I don't think Zacha is as good of a center overall
9 mars à 21 h 18
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,881
Mentions "j'aime": 1,198
Quoting: dons_weeney
That's fair too, I'd take that IF they do decide to move Ullmark and already have a center.


NJ was never trading that pick lottery protected. I’m curious what Sweeney asked for that ended the conversation with NJ
9 mars à 21 h 19
#11
Démarrer sujet
Best armchair GM yet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 593
Mentions "j'aime": 139
Quoting: NHLfan10506
How about Chandler Stephenson…since VGK got Hertl


Decent option. Not quite good enough imo, Lindholm is probably the lowest end 1C I'd make a strong push for. Stephenson seems more like another coyle/zacha
9 mars à 21 h 28
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 4,343
Mentions "j'aime": 1,341
Quoting: Celtics21
NJ was never trading that pick lottery protected. I’m curious what Sweeney asked for that ended the conversation with NJ



I know they’ve briefly spoke, but has there been further reports on Ullmark to NJ?
9 mars à 21 h 38
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,881
Mentions "j'aime": 1,198
Quoting: Devsfan25
I know they’ve briefly spoke, but has there been further reports on Ullmark to NJ?


I think the assumption on Fitzgeralds comments about teams trying to extort was Sweeney, but it could have easily been Conroy with Calgary

I thought you guys got Montreal’s 2024 in the Toffoli deal. I was wrong
9 mars à 21 h 41
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 4,343
Mentions "j'aime": 1,341
Quoting: Celtics21
I think the assumption on Fitzgeralds comments about teams trying to extort was Sweeney, but it could have easily been Conroy with Calgary

I thought you guys got Montreal’s 2024 in the Toffoli deal. I was wrong


Yeah I think he was talking about Conroy. And yeah originally we thought it was but unfortunately not
9 mars à 22 h 2
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,861
Mentions "j'aime": 8,867
Quoting: dons_weeney
Agreed, Coyle can play wing too, but I do think it's still worth adding Lindholm because I don't think Zacha is as good of a center overall



Or you go after Reinhart and leave the centers alone. 🤷🏻‍♂️

The 12.5 you spent on Elias and Jake would be better off on Reinhart and a LD

Top 9

Marchy-Zacha-Pasta
Freddy-Coyle-Reinhart
Merk/Lysell-Poitras-Geekie
9 mars à 22 h 20
#16
Démarrer sujet
Best armchair GM yet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 593
Mentions "j'aime": 139
Quoting: Gofnut999
Or you go after Reinhart and leave the centers alone. 🤷🏻‍♂️

The 12.5 you spent on Elias and Jake would be better off on Reinhart and a LD

Top 9

Marchy-Zacha-Pasta
Freddy-Coyle-Reinhart
Merk/Lysell-Poitras-Geekie


Reinhart would be sweet ngl. I just don't see how the B's can be contenders with lacking centers. Unless they find a way to bring one in later in the year or the year after, or if Poitras keeps developing who knows
10 mars à 0 h 55
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,881
Mentions "j'aime": 1,198
Quoting: Gofnut999
Or you go after Reinhart and leave the centers alone. 🤷🏻‍♂️

The 12.5 you spent on Elias and Jake would be better off on Reinhart and a LD

Top 9

Marchy-Zacha-Pasta
Freddy-Coyle-Reinhart
Merk/Lysell-Poitras-Geekie


I don’t think he’s leaving Florida. Competing against no state income tax where he currently lives and knows his role is tougher unless Florida is trying to get him for cheap

The current situation with Boston is probably the best fit for Lindholm.
10 mars à 10 h 8
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,861
Mentions "j'aime": 8,867
Quoting: Celtics21
I don’t think he’s leaving Florida. Competing against no state income tax where he currently lives and knows his role is tougher unless Florida is trying to get him for cheap

The current situation with Boston is probably the best fit for Lindholm.


I don’t imagine he will either. But until he is off the board…
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage