SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Next SZN

Créé par: Marcsnack
Équipe: 2024-25 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 8 mars 2024
Publié: 9 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
DEPARTURES:
I feel like Smith & Eller are two players we can move this offseason. If we cannot move Eller, I would try and move Acciari instead, but I would keep at least one of them.
I dont think we will be able to move Rakell, but if you can, I would consider.
If Blomqvist isnt ready, I would bring back Ned on a 1-2 year deal.

WEAPONIZING CAP:
With so much cap, I would try and weaponize it a bit. Other options include Faksa (DAL), Campbell (EDM), Goodrow (NYR). In this trade, WPG moves out nearly $6M by sending us their bottom pairing D and a young forward who does not play much, as well as a 3rd. They get a veteran back in Nieto.

YOUNG TALENT:
I would love to see a big influx of young talent on the roster. DOC & Puustinen are already playing in the NHL right now. I do think Poulin and Ponomarev will join the roster at some point this season, so we will see if they do well enough to stick around for next year. I do not think Yager or Pickering are ready just yet.

FREE AGENTS/NEW PLAYERS:
If we decide to not weaponize cap, I can see us targeting a dman or two via free agency. I would also like to sign a winger. I went for DeBrusk, because he is on the younger side of UFAs available. I can also see us getting roster players back for Smith/Eller and not get as high/any picks in return.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1900 000 $
2800 000 $
2900 000 $
1875 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
44 250 000 $
Transactions
1.
PIT
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (ANA)
Détails additionnels:
Traded anywhere
2.
PIT
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (ANA)
Détails additionnels:
Traded anywhere
3.
PIT
  1. Kupari, Rasmus
  2. Schmidt, Nate
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2026 (WPG)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de PIT
Logo de PHI
Logo de ANA
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de NYR
2025
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de ANA
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de FLA
2026
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de WPG
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2387 675 000 $82 761 009 $0 $77 500 $4 913 991 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AG
RFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
795 000 $795 000 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 375 000 $5 375 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
886 667 $886 667 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
900 000 $900 000 $
DG
RFA
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
5 950 000 $5 950 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
875 000 $875 000 $
AD, AG
RFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
800 000 $800 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
9 mars à 0 h 32
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 921
Mentions "j'aime": 380
I know Dubas is against it, but I don't think a Reilly Smith buyout would be that terrible. I have a hard time finding a suitable trade for him in 2024-2025.
edeangel84 a aimé ceci.
9 mars à 1 h 2
#2
JimmyPaek
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 3,945
Mentions "j'aime": 1,175
Quoting: Play_Party_Hard
I know Dubas is against it, but I don't think a Reilly Smith buyout would be that terrible. I have a hard time finding a suitable trade for him in 2024-2025.


That’s by far my biggest problem with Dubas, the anti-buyouts. His biggest mistake of the entire offseason was not using a buyout on Granlund before free agency opened. Had he done that it would have created not only another roster spot open in the forward group, but freed up a couple million more before UFAs signed. That could have helped us attract another forward for a middle 6 role and of course it would have avoided an unnecessary trade for EK.
9 mars à 1 h 19
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 627
Mentions "j'aime": 408
Makes absolutely no sense for WPG to spend that many assets to dump Schmidt in his final year. They can easily retain half and get late pick back or just buy him out. They have enough bottom six players and dont need Nieto.
Windjammer a aimé ceci.
9 mars à 15 h 28
#4
Pens71
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 117
Mentions "j'aime": 53
Quoting: edeangel84
That’s by far my biggest problem with Dubas, the anti-buyouts. His biggest mistake of the entire offseason was not using a buyout on Granlund before free agency opened. Had he done that it would have created not only another roster spot open in the forward group, but freed up a couple million more before UFAs signed. That could have helped us attract another forward for a middle 6 role and of course it would have avoided an unnecessary trade for EK.


no thanks to buying out Granlund. He made the right call on the trade. Buyouts stink.....aka J.Johnson. still paying him
9 mars à 17 h 57
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 3,338
Mentions "j'aime": 1,183
Quoting: Play_Party_Hard
I know Dubas is against it, but I don't think a Reilly Smith buyout would be that terrible. I have a hard time finding a suitable trade for him in 2024-2025.


I defo think someone out there pays for Smith. We can definitely trade him for a return.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage