SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Underwhelming for underwhelming

Créé par: lowblocksniper
Équipe: 2024-25 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 4 mars 2024
Publié: 4 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
OTT
  1. Karlsson, Erik
Détails additionnels:
Ottawa gets a RD and moves on from Chabot whose been inconsistent
Hopefully Karlsson finds his PPG pace again in Ottawa
PIT
  1. Chabot, Thomas
Détails additionnels:
Pittsburgh gets a little younger and cheaper
Karlsson hasn't had the desired impact for Pitt maybe Chabot pairs well with Letang
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de OTT
Logo de BOS
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de DET
Logo de TBL
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
2026
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
1587 700 000 $69 584 047 $850 000 $0 $18 115 953 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 205 714 $8 205 714 $
AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 350 000 $8 350 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 975 000 $4 975 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
835 000 $835 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 050 000 $8 050 000 $
DG
UFA - 8
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
805 000 $805 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
7 950 000 $7 950 000 $
C
UFA - 6

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
4 mars à 8 h 50
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 870
Mentions "j'aime": 200
ek65 has been just as advertised. just because he isn't on pace for another 100 point season doesn't mean he hasn't worked out.

now i don't know if you are a pens fan, if not, i do not blame you for not watching games, but karl's defense has gotten better and he has been doing just fine.

the only case that attracts pitt is the instance of getting younger and clearing cap.

interesting take.
4 mars à 8 h 52
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 141
Mentions "j'aime": 65
Penguins accept before you change your mind
4 mars à 8 h 54
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2023
Messages: 2,813
Mentions "j'aime": 956
Karlsson percentiles among dmen with 500+ min:
Points: 94th%
Corsi: 97th%
Xgoals against per 60: 81st%
Shooting Talent Above Average: 97th%

Same categories for Chabot
Points: 74th%
Corsi: 98th%
Xgoals against per 60: 90th%
Shooting Talent Above Average: 76th%

I would say neither player is underperforming / underwhelming.

Karlsson being RD and more of a game breaker gives him a bit more value. Though Chabot is 5 years younger and slightly cheaper.
4 mars à 8 h 54
#4
Jimmy Stu
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 1,479
Mentions "j'aime": 541
Poor asset management by sens though. And seeing that pens essentially paid cap dumps and 1st for him... When he was playing better in SJ (not saying he's playing bad in Pitt, just not as dominate), Chabot is worth more than that

This hate for Chabot is wild on this site tbh lol
4 mars à 8 h 57
#5
Démarrer sujet
LBS
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 1,518
Mentions "j'aime": 559
Quoting: loganocota
ek65 has been just as advertised. just because he isn't on pace for another 100 point season doesn't mean he hasn't worked out.

now i don't know if you are a pens fan, if not, i do not blame you for not watching games, but karl's defense has gotten better and he has been doing just fine.

the only case that attracts pitt is the instance of getting younger and clearing cap.

interesting take.


I'm a Flames fan, watched Karlsson play on Saturday he wasn't bad at all but, outside of his point total and it's not all on him but, Pitts bad PP is kind of his reason for being there. He supposed to make the PP elite and give Letang a break in ice time, it hasn't worked as hoped

Saturday was an unfortunate night for Letang
HillbillyPenguin88 a aimé ceci.
4 mars à 9 h 1
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 141
Mentions "j'aime": 65
Quoting: lowblocksniper
I'm a Flames fan, watched Karlsson play on Saturday he wasn't bad at all but, outside of his point total and it's not all on him but, Pitts bad PP is kind of his reason for being there. He supposed to make the PP elite and give Letang a break in ice time, it hasn't worked as hoped

Saturday was an unfortunate night for Letang


This! He was never expected to be a defensive anchor, because he never has been, but when your powerplay is the worst that it has been in a long long time then having EK at 10 million a year isn't ideal.
4 mars à 9 h 57
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 419
Mentions "j'aime": 193
Neither play is underwhelming. Both are great. Just because their teams lose games doesn't mean they're bad. Would much rather Chabot's contract
4 mars à 11 h 21
#8
Démarrer sujet
LBS
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 1,518
Mentions "j'aime": 559
Quoting: CMac66
Poor asset management by sens though. And seeing that pens essentially paid cap dumps and 1st for him... When he was playing better in SJ (not saying he's playing bad in Pitt, just not as dominate), Chabot is worth more than that

This hate for Chabot is wild on this site tbh lol


I wouldn't say Chabot hate but, I think his standing in the NHL as a whole has started dropping.
I think he was expected to be Canada's #1 LD or Shea Theodore 2yrs ago now it looks like a long shot for him to make the team (hypothetically speaking since the 2026 olympics are not a guarantee)
He's still Ottawa's #1D but, you get the feeling Sanderson is taking that spot.
4 mars à 11 h 27
#9
Démarrer sujet
LBS
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 1,518
Mentions "j'aime": 559
Quoting: stuuuuuuuuuuutzle
Neither play is underwhelming. Both are great. Just because their teams lose games doesn't mean they're bad. Would much rather Chabot's contract


It's Chabot at 2mil cheaper but a year longer.
Karlsson is underwhelming IMO because he was traded for by Pitt so that he could carry the PP and take ice time away from Letang it has gone as hoped but, not entirely his fault since hockey is a team game.
Chabot is underwhelming IMO because his play isn't where you'd hope (Norris conversation), he's stayed good but, he's being passed all around the league by guys including Sanderson who will probably be the #1D in Ottawa next year
4 mars à 11 h 31
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 419
Mentions "j'aime": 193
Quoting: lowblocksniper
It's Chabot at 2mil cheaper but a year longer.
Karlsson is underwhelming IMO because he was traded for by Pitt so that he could carry the PP and take ice time away from Letang it has gone as hoped but, not entirely his fault since hockey is a team game.
Chabot is underwhelming IMO because his play isn't where you'd hope (Norris conversation), he's stayed good but, he's being passed all around the league by guys including Sanderson who will probably be the #1D in Ottawa next year


With an 88M cap, you don't need to be a Norris candidate and number 1 D to be worth 8M. Sanderson is incredible and his contract is gonna be a steal. Because of how well he has done, people have really started underrating the great things Chabot brings
4 mars à 11 h 35
#11
Démarrer sujet
LBS
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 1,518
Mentions "j'aime": 559
Quoting: stuuuuuuuuuuutzle
With an 88M cap, you don't need to be a Norris candidate and number 1 D to be worth 8M. Sanderson is incredible and his contract is gonna be a steal. Because of how well he has done, people have really started underrating the great things Chabot brings


I mean, I'm not calling him a bum he's just not in the top NHL D conversation anymore and despite age I think his value is about equal to last years Norris winner, so I don't think I'm insulting him
4 mars à 13 h 37
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 5,871
Mentions "j'aime": 1,527
no chance OTT trades a 26yo for a 34 yo
4 mars à 18 h 36
#13
Jimmy Stu
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 1,479
Mentions "j'aime": 541
Quoting: lowblocksniper
I mean, I'm not calling him a bum he's just not in the top NHL D conversation anymore and despite age I think his value is about equal to last years Norris winner, so I don't think I'm insulting him


Well the stats would say otherwise. He is a number 1 on a lot of teams and how you worded it sounds better than it is. Norris winner last year for Chabot... but taking in age, contract into account and the probability he had the one last great season in him? On a team letting him do whatever he wanted with no competition for pp time? These factors matter, and its poor asset management. Minute munchers don't just show up and no dman is perfect so I think accepting Chabot for who he is would help this fanbase imo. He is literally in year 1 of his prime years and Karlsson can fall off the map next year, who knows. This has instant regret trade all over it
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage