SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

3 way fun

Créé par: ecupirate07
Équipe: 2023-24 Hurricanes de la Caroline
Date de création initiale: 1 mars 2024
Publié: 3 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Accurate/Prorated
LTIR activée: Non
Journées à la saison: 192
Journées restantes: 41
Saison restante: 21%
Masse salariale projetée avant les jours restants Info-bulle : 82 214 365 $
Description
Pit gets Bunting
Pit sends Smith & retains 50% on Zucker
Zona gets a 3rd
Canes get Smith and Zucker @ 50%


Edmonton gets Pesce @ 50 and Katchouk (for depth)
Edmonton sends 2nd, Foegele, Ceci, and broberg
Chicago sends pesce with 50% retention and Katchouk to Edmonton and Murphy to Carolina
Chicago gets Ceci, Foegele, 1st, philly’s 2nd, Nystrom and Gunler
Carolina sends Pesce thru Chicago to Edmonton, 1st, best 2nd round pick, Gunler, Nystrom to Chicago
Carolina gets Murphy, Edmonton’s 2nd, and Broberg

Why Carolina: get 3 guys for next year’s roster and add scoring depth this year. They get better defensively by moving bunting

Edmonton: they get a RD while moving out cap space. They keep their first to make another move.
Chicago: they are taking on cap and retention while capitalizing on value for good futures.
Transactions
1.
CAR
  1. Zucker, Jason (2 650 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Zona isn’t retaining, Pittsburgh is
ARI
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (CAR)
2.
CAR
  1. Smith, Reilly
Détails additionnels:
Pittsburgh isn’t retaining multiple years to make a deal so they retain 50% of Zucker instead to balance value
3.
CAR
  1. Broberg, Philip
  2. Ceci, Cody
  3. Foegele, Warren
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
4.
CHI
  1. Ceci, Cody
  2. Foegele, Warren
  3. Gunler, Noel
  4. Nyström, Joel [Liste de réserve]
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (CAR)
  6. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (PHI)
5.
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CAR
Logo de EDM
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CAR
2025
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
2026
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2483 500 000 $83 373 551 $450 000 $1 350 000 $126 449 $
Masse salariale proratée

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
7 750 000 $1 654 948 $
AG, AD
UFA - 6
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
8 460 250 $1 806 616 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 400 000 $1 153 125 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 000 000 $1 067 708 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
4 820 000 $1 029 271 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
3 000 000 $640 625 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
2 650 000 $565 885 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
2 900 000 $619 271 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
894 167 $190 942 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
1 800 000 $384 375 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
925 000 $197 526 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
2 400 000 $512 500 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 300 000 $1 131 771 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 280 000 $1 127 500 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
2 000 000 $427 083 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 250 000 $1 121 094 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 400 000 $939 583 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
762 500 $162 826 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
7 750 000 $1 654 948 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
762 500 $162 826 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
800 000 $170 833 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
3 400 000 $726 042 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
762 500 $162 826 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
1 500 000 $320 313 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
863 333 $184 358 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
1 675 000 $357 682 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
3 mars à 8 h 30
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 569
Mentions "j'aime": 176
deal
3 mars à 9 h 20
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 3,616
Mentions "j'aime": 3,044
I don’t get the fascination with trading Bunting to Pittsburgh from canes fans on here
3 mars à 9 h 23
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 688
Mentions "j'aime": 27
The Chicago trade seems overly complicated and a bit of a lateral move, but trades are pretty fair and creative overall. Nice job.
3 mars à 9 h 36
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 9,282
Mentions "j'aime": 2,971
Quoting: Canesfan21_
I don’t get the fascination with trading Bunting to Pittsburgh from canes fans on here


Bunting is a defensive sieve even in our system. We are going to have to bury him on the 4th line for the playoffs or that 2nd line will get preyed upon. He isn’t a bad player or a cap dump but if we can move him for someone who will be better in our system, it should be explored
3 mars à 9 h 36
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 3,616
Mentions "j'aime": 3,044
Quoting: ecupirate07
Bunting is a defensive sieve even in our system. We are going to have to bury him on the 4th line for the playoffs or that 2nd line will get preyed upon


We have more than enough defensively responsible forwards. It’s going to be fine.
3 mars à 9 h 41
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 9,282
Mentions "j'aime": 2,971
Quoting: Canesfan21_
We have more than enough defensively responsible forwards. It’s going to be fine.


Smith is more than just a defensive forward
3 mars à 10 h 19
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 8,736
Mentions "j'aime": 10,611
My head hurts from trying to follow the Car/Edm/Chi 3-way. But the Hawks probably accept.
Snowhawk18 et ecupirate07 a aimé ceci.
3 mars à 10 h 20
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 393
Mentions "j'aime": 65
This definitely makes sense for Pittsburgh.
3 mars à 10 h 40
#9
Snowhawk
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 2,411
Mentions "j'aime": 3,443
I would be all over this is I was Davidson.

Hawks ship out Murphy with no retention, Katchouk decent 4th line depth guy and retain 50% on Peace for the remainder of this season and get:

1st and 2nd round picks, two B- prospects, Ceci to backfill for next season for Murphy and Foegele who I hope they would try to resign and if not they could move for another 2nd/3rd round pick.

Sign me up!
ecupirate07 et Hawksguy81 a aimé ceci.
3 mars à 11 h 8
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 549
Mentions "j'aime": 236
Take out Foegele and I'd think EDM considers this.
3 mars à 11 h 34
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 9,282
Mentions "j'aime": 2,971
Quoting: PurpleHippo
Take out Foegele and I'd think EDM considers this.


That’s fine. I was just trying to maximize edmonton’s cap dumping potential to use their first elsewhere
PurpleHippo a aimé ceci.
3 mars à 11 h 35
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 9,282
Mentions "j'aime": 2,971
Quoting: Hawksguy81
My head hurts from trying to follow the Car/Edm/Chi 3-way. But the Hawks probably accept.


Just trying to keep things unnecessarily complicated
Hawksguy81 a aimé ceci.
3 mars à 11 h 37
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 175
Mentions "j'aime": 40
I feel like Chicago is getting more for Murphy than we are getting for Pesce. I get that Chicago is retaining for Pesce, but I would expect him to get more on the market than Murphy would. Maybe I'm thinking about the trade the wrong way idk?
3 mars à 11 h 51
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 9,282
Mentions "j'aime": 2,971
Quoting: amullican
I feel like Chicago is getting more for Murphy than we are getting for Pesce. I get that Chicago is retaining for Pesce, but I would expect him to get more on the market than Murphy would. Maybe I'm thinking about the trade the wrong way idk?


They are retaining on pesce, taking on ceci, and murphy has term
3 mars à 12 h 10
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 175
Mentions "j'aime": 40
Quoting: ecupirate07
They are retaining on pesce, taking on ceci, and murphy has term


Ceci is coming from Edmonton though, we shouldn't be the ones paying to get rid of him. Murphy does have term, but we're giving up Pesce, two prospects, a first, and 2nd and getting back Murphy, a 2nd, and Broberg. The value just doesn't seem to match up from a Carolina perspective.

Edit: I think Edmonton should be the ones paying to get rid of Ceci and for retention on Pesce not us.
3 mars à 12 h 23
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 9,282
Mentions "j'aime": 2,971
Quoting: amullican
Ceci is coming from Edmonton though, we shouldn't be the ones paying to get rid of him. Murphy does have term, but we're giving up Pesce, two prospects, a first, and 2nd and getting back Murphy, a 2nd, and Broberg. The value just doesn't seem to match up from a Carolina perspective.

Edit: I think Edmonton should be the ones paying to get rid of Ceci and for retention on Pesce not us.


We are paying for Broberg by paying for Chicago to take on ceci
3 mars à 12 h 30
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 175
Mentions "j'aime": 40
Quoting: ecupirate07
We are paying for Broberg by paying for Chicago to take on ceci


To me Broberg+2nd is the package for Pesce. We don't need to "pay extra" for Broberg by helping Edmonton get rid of Ceci. Idk it just feels like we're giving up the most in the trade and not quite getting equal value back. It's a creative idea though.
3 mars à 12 h 36
#18
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 9,282
Mentions "j'aime": 2,971
Quoting: amullican
To me Broberg+2nd is the package for Pesce. We don't need to "pay extra" for Broberg by helping Edmonton get rid of Ceci. Idk it just feels like we're giving up the most in the trade and not quite getting equal value back. It's a creative idea though.


Fair enough
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage