Don't see Uncle Lou throwing the in the towel but Pelech or Puloch would be nice to see in our lineup!

Muzzin had more offensive upside than Pelech, but id fs love him on Tor. doubt he gets moved tho

Muzzin went for 1st + Grundstrom and Druzi

Grundstrom/Durzi at the time were two High B lvl to low A depending on who you asked prospects

That aint it

Would have to be Niemela + Minten and a 1st to match

The quantity over quality thing for some reason Toronto fans seem to love. Throw enough scraps and it equals quality.🙄

If EA NHL has taught me anything, it's that if you can't agree on a trade, keep adding low-quality pieces until the computer accepts. That's how real GM-ing is done.

Timmins and Villeneuve aren't really assets, and Kampf is basically here as cap ballast (I don't see a reason for a team already paying JG Pageau & Casey Cizikas needing to add a guy like him) so this deal is basically Hirvonen and a 1st for Pelech.

as said above, that doesn't really match the Muzzin trade as a comp. that trade, made on 1/28/2019, brought back:

-a 2019 1st (value met here by the 2024 1st)
-Sean Durzi (a 2nd round pick from the prior draft - this would be Fraser MInten)
-Carl Grundstrom (a 2nd round pick from 2 years prior - your 2nd round pick two years ago is Matthew Knies)

And honestly, before you try and argue that Knies is a different level of player than Grundstrom, keep in mind that we didn't know what he would turn into back then. He was a top 3-5 prospect by most outlet's rankings entering the 2018-19 season, so just because he's turned into a bottom-6er in LA doesn't mean he wasn't valued highly. Durzi was also usually ranked in the 5-7 range by a lot of outlets so I'd argue that a comparable would be two out of Cowan/Minten/Niemela/Knies to match how Grundstrom & Durzi were viewed back then.