SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

What the Leafs likely do at deadline

Créé par: HShockey
Équipe: 2023-24 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 21 févr. 2024
Publié: 21 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (NJD)
Détails additionnels:
Some type of deal to move up and acquire 2nd
SJS
  1. Timmins, Conor
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (NYI)
  3. Choix de 5e ronde en 2026 (TOR)
2.
TOR
  1. Tanev, Christopher (2 250 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Third party retains

The Flames recieve a B-level prospect + a 2nd rounder for Tanev. If no one steps up and acquires a 1st; I think this may be enough
CGY
  1. Moldenhauer, Nicholas [Liste de réserve]
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (NJD)
Détails additionnels:
According to reports, the Maple Leafs are offering "multiple picks"; no firsts. The Flames are waiting it out to see if they can land a 1st rounder. Also, Tanev has full control of where he wants to go with his NTC
3.
TOR
  1. Trenin, Yakov (850 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Third team retains (NSH has 1 retention slot)
NSH
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2026 (TOR)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2026
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $79 656 450 $0 $0 $3 843 550 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
796 667 $796 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Flames de Calgary
-1 125 000 $-1 125 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 550 000 $3 550 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
766 667 $766 667 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
21 févr. à 15 h 29
#1
LBS
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 1,555
Mentions "j'aime": 568
Tanev doesn't have control outside of a list of 10 teams he said NO, that he named when he signed the deal or at the beginning of the league year
Flames might be holding and hoping for a 1st but, this does meet the criteria of wanting a 2nd+prospect.
Now we just have to see if Calgary wants to do business with Treliving
HShockey a aimé ceci.
21 févr. à 15 h 36
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 973
Mentions "j'aime": 410
not bad
HShockey a aimé ceci.
21 févr. à 15 h 38
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 350
Mentions "j'aime": 135
2 for ****in Timmers?! /s
21 févr. à 16 h 24
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2024
Messages: 102
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Quoting: matthias893
2 for ****in Timmers?! /s


Leafs fans don't live in reality.
21 févr. à 16 h 26
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 346
Mentions "j'aime": 190
From what I've seen Timmins is valued as a late round pick (I've seen Sharks send their 5th). Based on that, this is an early 5th, a late 5th, and a mid 3rd for a mid 2nd. Per the Athletic's draft value chart, the early 5th is worth 0.3 GSVA, the late 5th is 0.2, and the mid 3rd is about 0.7, so they combine to about 1.2 GSVA. A mid second is around 1.6 or 1.7 GSVA. Bumping up Timmins' value to an early 4th only adds an additional 0.2 GSVA which still has it a bit short.

From skimming through trades and comparing values, the teams moving up tend to pay a bit more than The Athletic's values (for instance, when the Coyotes traded up to 11 it cost them 27, 34, and 45 which is 1.8 GSVA extra, or the value of pick 45). The Sharks are also trying to get more early picks because they need more quality than quantity so they're especially unlikely to trade back unless it's an overpay.

All of this is before factoring in that the Devils' pick has the potential to become a 1st rounder in the unlikely chance that they reach the ECF and the fact that the Leafs' 5th is 2 years in the future which is generally seen as a lower value than a pick in the current season.
HShockey et ChadBradson a aimé ceci.
21 févr. à 18 h 6
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 1,261
Mentions "j'aime": 438
Quoting: jamnjon
From what I've seen Timmins is valued as a late round pick (I've seen Sharks send their 5th). Based on that, this is an early 5th, a late 5th, and a mid 3rd for a mid 2nd. Per the Athletic's draft value chart, the early 5th is worth 0.3 GSVA, the late 5th is 0.2, and the mid 3rd is about 0.7, so they combine to about 1.2 GSVA. A mid second is around 1.6 or 1.7 GSVA. Bumping up Timmins' value to an early 4th only adds an additional 0.2 GSVA which still has it a bit short.

From skimming through trades and comparing values, the teams moving up tend to pay a bit more than The Athletic's values (for instance, when the Coyotes traded up to 11 it cost them 27, 34, and 45 which is 1.8 GSVA extra, or the value of pick 45). The Sharks are also trying to get more early picks because they need more quality than quantity so they're especially unlikely to trade back unless it's an overpay.

All of this is before factoring in that the Devils' pick has the potential to become a 1st rounder in the unlikely chance that they reach the ECF and the fact that the Leafs' 5th is 2 years in the future which is generally seen as a lower value than a pick in the current season.


Didn't know about the Athletic's draft value chart. Considering the conditions involved, the Sharks definetly reject. I would do this move for any late pick IF possible (I would assume a late second is worth a bit less) making the value pretty close to fair. Obviously SJ would be going for quality over quantity, but I'd assume some contending team with a lack of picks may make this deal for an extra pick + Timmins
21 févr. à 18 h 9
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 346
Mentions "j'aime": 190
Quoting: HShockey
Didn't know about the Athletic's draft value chart. Considering the conditions involved, the Sharks definetly reject. I would do this move for any late pick IF possible (I would assume a late second is worth a bit less) making the value pretty close to fair. Obviously SJ would be going for quality over quantity, but I'd assume some contending team with a lack of picks may make this deal for an extra pick + Timmins


Here's that draft pick value chart. Keep in mind that it's an estimate...obviously on draft day if teams are looking for a particular player available at that point who they don't think will be available with their regular pick they might value a pick position more than the chart. Generally speaking from what I've seen, the team trading up pays more than the chart's value.

Screen-Shot-2020-05-05-at-4.55.33-PM.png
dannibalcorpse et HShockey a aimé ceci.
21 févr. à 18 h 36
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 1,261
Mentions "j'aime": 438
Quoting: jamnjon
Here's that draft pick value chart. Keep in mind that it's an estimate...obviously on draft day if teams are looking for a particular player available at that point who they don't think will be available with their regular pick they might value a pick position more than the chart. Generally speaking from what I've seen, the team trading up pays more than the chart's value.

Screen-Shot-2020-05-05-at-4.55.33-PM.png


Thanks!
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage