SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

How we feeling about this

Créé par: Droakner
Équipe: 2023-24 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 20 févr. 2024
Publié: 20 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
EDM
  1. O'Connor, Drew
  2. Smith, Reilly (2 500 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
So this trade idea would only happen if the Oilers don't like the cost of Guentzel and aren't confident that they can resign him after trade.

DISCLAIMER, Pittsburg would retain 1.25M of the 2.5M with San Jose being brought in to take the other 1.25M

Pens get Foegele who is a decent middle 6 guy who can either be flipped for picks or kept at the deadline, Lavoie is a good prospect who is being held out and kept in the minors due to to much depth in Edmonton. Holland has repeatedly said that the 1st will not be flipped for a rental, so he uses it to get Smith the pick will be around 25-32, also get a 3rd rounder.
PIT
  1. Foegele, Warren
  2. Lavoie, Raphael
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2026 (EDM)
Détails additionnels:
Oilers get their sought after top 6 RW with term and a scoring touch on the cheap, O'Connor is a bottom 6 guy that can fill in where needed

Trade brake down is as follows

Smith = Foegele, 2024 1st
O'Connor = Lavioe
1.25M retained = 2026 3rd
2.
EDM
    San Jose retains 1.25M of the 2.5M total retained
    SJS
    1. Tullio, Tyler
    2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2024 (NSH)
    3.
    EDM
    1. Fleury, Marc-André (1 250 000 $ retained)
    Détails additionnels:
    MAF will be good for the oilers for the same reason Smith was good for them when going into the playoffs, we all know that Skinner will be and is the #1 goalie and will start ever game in the playoffs, but MAF will be good as a form of guidance and insurance that if skinner is having troubles MAF is reliable to come in a help out.
    MIN
    1. Bourgault, Xavier
    2. Janmark, Mattias
    3. Choix de 5e ronde en 2025 (EDM)
    4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2026 (EDM)
    Rachats de contrats
    Enfoui
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2024
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    2025
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    2026
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2083 500 000 $83 029 167 $850 000 $975 000 $470 833 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
    AG, C
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
    AG, AD
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
    C, AG
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance650 000 $$650K)
    AG, C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
    C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    775 000 $775 000 $ (Bonis de performance325 000 $$325K)
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    925 000 $925 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    900 000 $900 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    775 000 $775 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
    DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
    G
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Wild du Minnesota
    2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
    G
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    762 500 $762 500 $
    DD
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    20 févr. à 13 h 48
    #1
    SirRobo
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2023
    Messages: 567
    Mentions "j'aime": 134
    Thought for sure id see an upgrade to defence here
    Droakner a aimé ceci.
    20 févr. à 13 h 49
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    Droakner
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2023
    Messages: 201
    Mentions "j'aime": 62
    Quoting: SirRobo
    Thought for sure id see an upgrade to defence here


    I was Going for just straight Forward trade ideas, but yes I would have made a Dman upgrade if I did
    SirRobo a aimé ceci.
    20 févr. à 13 h 49
    #3
    "Go sell ice cream!"
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 2,901
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,324
    If Dubas is rebuilding then sure, that's a great return. But that's not happening if Dubas isn't rebuilding.
    20 févr. à 13 h 51
    #4
    Démarrer sujet
    Droakner
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2023
    Messages: 201
    Mentions "j'aime": 62
    Quoting: jfkst1
    If Dubas is rebuilding then sure, that's a great return. But that's not happening if Dubas isn't rebuilding.


    100%, that is one of the only IF's about that trade. I do see Dubas doing a quick speedy rebuild
    20 févr. à 13 h 51
    #5
    sharks88
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 348
    Mentions "j'aime": 174
    SJ declines but maybe there's another team with multiple retention slots who would do that.
    MAF seems like a bit of an overpay but the picks are far out so maybe it's fair.
    jamnjon a aimé ceci.
    20 févr. à 13 h 55
    #6
    Démarrer sujet
    Droakner
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2023
    Messages: 201
    Mentions "j'aime": 62
    Quoting: sharksdoee
    SJ declines but maybe there's another team with multiple retention slots who would do that.
    MAF seems like a bit of an overpay but the picks are far out so maybe it's fair.


    Fair, I did have Zona doing the retention originally but decided on the sharks as they are deeper in a rebuild and thought Tullio would be enticing enough lol .

    MAF is maybe close to an overpay with Bourgault having a off year in the minors and Janmark, a 2nd and a 5th seemed fail considering they are retaining and taking on money
    sharksdoee a aimé ceci.
    20 févr. à 13 h 58
    #7
    Ban Price trades
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2017
    Messages: 6,482
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,455
    I actually really like the Pittsburgh trade, I just don't think San Jose is going to be the team that does the retaining. They only have one retention slot until 2025-26. One figures that slot is reserved for two years of one-year rentals or Couture.

    Fleury isn't an upgrade on Pickard: the only thing he's bringing is name brand recognition. Nedeljkovic is the only free agent netminder not currently on a playoff-bound team that constitutes an upgrade. Kahkonen, Reimer, Fleury, and Lankinen are all statistical downgrades with games played being the only real argument for acquiring them. Three of those names have as much playoff experience in the last four years as Pickard does. Fleury's last two years of work should dissuade Edmonton from making that purchase.

    Realistically, the near $1.5M in cap space that this Fleury trade commits in net over Pickard is absolutely going to be better off used on the blueline unless it's bringing back Ned. I don't feel great about Campbell being the #3 but his play as of late in the AHL and his playoff resume thinks it could be a survivable ordeal so long as the group in front of him is running at or above 100%. One would hope Rodrigue gets some NHL exposure before the season is out in case there's continued wobble to Jack's game.
    Droakner a aimé ceci.
    20 févr. à 14 h 1
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2021
    Messages: 526
    Mentions "j'aime": 233
    I don't see Smith as an improvement on Foeg's tbh, what aspect of his game is better?

    Also god damn would it sting if we moved XB to Minny after trading back from Wallstedt for him haha
    20 févr. à 14 h 55
    #9
    "Go sell ice cream!"
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 2,901
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,324
    Quoting: Droakner
    100%, that is one of the only IF's about that trade. I do see Dubas doing a quick speedy rebuild


    I expect he'll be quite good at rebuilding. It's a matter of when ownership authorizes it. I doubt it will be this year but could easily be next season at this time if they continue to regress.
    20 févr. à 18 h 1
    #10
    Ryan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 152
    Mentions "j'aime": 22
    MAF no longer available as Mn in the playoff hunt
    20 févr. à 20 h 23
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 317
    Mentions "j'aime": 180
    Quoting: Droakner
    Fair, I did have Zona doing the retention originally but decided on the sharks as they are deeper in a rebuild and thought Tullio would be enticing enough lol .


    The Athletic ranks Edmonton's prospect pool as the 25th best in the league and they rank Tullio as their 9th best prospect.
    "Tullio has been fine but unspectacular at the AHL level." "I worry he’ll top out as a bit of a AAAA guy, but he remains a relevant prospect who is still just 20 [sic]. I’ll be interested to see if he can knock on the door by 23 in a way that Raphael Lavoie finally has (they’re completely different players, but followed similar statistical trajectories)."

    Him plus a 6th isn't worth the final retention slot for the Sharks if it was just this year particularly considering some of the pieces they'd like to move who are going to be competing for that retention slot. Add in next year and it's definitely not worth it. However, as others have said, I'm sure you can find another team with the space that isn't short on retention slots willing to take that on.
    21 févr. à 12 h 21
    #12
    Ban Price trades
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2017
    Messages: 6,482
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,455
    Quoting: PurpleHippo
    I don't see Smith as an improvement on Foeg's tbh, what aspect of his game is better?

    Also god damn would it sting if we moved XB to Minny after trading back from Wallstedt for him haha


    Finishing and he has extra term. Statistically, he's only a minor downgrade in most on-ice metrics and replacing Foegele (or resigning him) can't be done for $2.5M.
    21 févr. à 12 h 28
    #13
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2021
    Messages: 526
    Mentions "j'aime": 233
    Quoting: BeterChiarelli
    Finishing and he has extra term. Statistically, he's only a minor downgrade in most on-ice metrics and replacing Foegele (or resigning him) can't be done for $2.5M.


    I assume Foeg's is re-signing at 2.5M, may be wishful but he seems to really enjoy being here.
    It's a different idea going into deadline, maybe a bit of an overpay but refreshing from all the Guentz trade's I've been seeing.
    21 févr. à 12 h 54
    #14
    Ban Price trades
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2017
    Messages: 6,482
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,455
    Quoting: PurpleHippo
    I assume Foeg's is re-signing at 2.5M, may be wishful but he seems to really enjoy being here.
    It's a different idea going into deadline, maybe a bit of an overpay but refreshing from all the Guentz trade's I've been seeing.


    $2.5M seems highly unrealistic: you'd be asking the player to take a pay cut when the cap is about to take its biggest jump in recent memory. Likewise, Foegele has a back-loaded deal and is going to want to stay at or above that $3.25M mark he's currently at for this season. That's just human nature.

    I'm expecting him to sign somewhere between the cap percentages of Lustorainen and Vatrano. That's going to see him earning anywhere between $3.15M to $3.85M on an $87.7M salary cap, probably on a three year deal. It feels rich for a 15G/20A player but he's always had strong possession metrics, can skate, and has picked up some PK utility in Edmonton. He's an ideal third-line forward for a team that can afford him.
    21 févr. à 13 h 4
    #15
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2021
    Messages: 526
    Mentions "j'aime": 233
    Quoting: BeterChiarelli
    $2.5M seems highly unrealistic: you'd be asking the player to take a pay cut when the cap is about to take its biggest jump in recent memory. Likewise, Foegele has a back-loaded deal and is going to want to stay at or above that $3.25M mark he's currently at for this season. That's just human nature.

    I'm expecting him to sign somewhere between the cap percentages of Lustorainen and Vatrano. That's going to see him earning anywhere between $3.15M to $3.85M on an $87.7M salary cap, probably on a three year deal. It feels rich for a 15G/20A player but he's always had strong possession metrics, can skate, and has picked up some PK utility in Edmonton. He's an ideal third-line forward for a team that can afford him.


    100%, I think a realistic amount for him is 3.5M for 3, but it depends on him as a person.
    Maybe he likes playing in EDM or with Drai/McD or that he is likely closest to a cup on EDM and thus takes a pay cut; again though, this is my wishful thinking.
    BeterChiarelli a aimé ceci.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage