SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

The move heard around the world

Créé par: Somms
Équipe: 2023-24 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 16 févr. 2024
Publié: 16 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
EDM
  1. Jenner, Boone (1 875 000 $ retained)
  2. Severson, Damon (1 250 000 $ retained)
CBJ
  1. Bourgault, Xavier
  2. Campbell, Jack
  3. Ceci, Cody
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (EDM)
  6. Choix de 1e ronde en 2026 (EDM)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de NSH
2025
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2026
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $82 380 000 $850 000 $5 050 000 $1 120 000 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 875 000 $1 875 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
775 000 $775 000 $ (Bonis de performance325 000 $$325K)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance650 000 $$650K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
775 000 $775 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 225 000 $$3M)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
762 500 $762 500 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
762 500 $762 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
16 févr. à 21 h 3
#1
boltsfan71
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 1,839
Mentions "j'aime": 638
Lol
16 févr. à 21 h 5
#2
BEDSY
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 143
Mentions "j'aime": 41
CBJ accepts
16 févr. à 22 h 38
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 976
Mentions "j'aime": 835
Quoting: MunchOnACookie
CBJ accepts


ummmm, no tf they don't?

2 of the 3 1sts put you at a net even for taking on Campbell's deal.
Bourgaut, the last 1, and Ceci maybe are about Jenner, but definitely not with retention

And then Severson, who they just signed for 8 years. Incredibly bad optics to make that trade, even if he's been disappointing. But that's DEFINITELY not getting retention. 7 more years of retention is insane.
SK101, dk325, CaseyFlyman and 3 others a aimé ceci.
16 févr. à 22 h 56
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 3,190
Mentions "j'aime": 2,884
Quoting: MunchOnACookie
CBJ accepts


Lol not a chance
dk325, CaseyFlyman et MunchOnACookie a aimé ceci.
17 févr. à 10 h 3
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 2,096
Mentions "j'aime": 1,770
Quoting: Trevor31lv
ummmm, no tf they don't?

2 of the 3 1sts put you at a net even for taking on Campbell's deal.
Bourgaut, the last 1, and Ceci maybe are about Jenner, but definitely not with retention

And then Severson, who they just signed for 8 years. Incredibly bad optics to make that trade, even if he's been disappointing. But that's DEFINITELY not getting retention. 7 more years of retention is insane.


I'd argue it doesn't cost quite one first to move Campbell's deal, since EDM buying him out is a legitimate option in the offseason (and certainly better than parting with 2 1sts). But it doesn't change the fact that it's a quick no.

There's absolutely zero chance, no scenario, where a team trades and retains on 6 years of a 7 year deal they just signed.
17 févr. à 17 h 42
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 976
Mentions "j'aime": 835
Quoting: CaseyFlyman
I'd argue it doesn't cost quite one first to move Campbell's deal, since EDM buying him out is a legitimate option in the offseason (and certainly better than parting with 2 1sts). But it doesn't change the fact that it's a quick no.

There's absolutely zero chance, no scenario, where a team trades and retains on 6 years of a 7 year deal they just signed.


Even worse, it's 7 of 8 cause they traded that 4th to get his rights.

Your point about Campbell is fair, but I think it's really only applicable to Edmonton's POV. Like, it only makes sense to trade so much to get out of him since they can also buy out. I'd argue the cost for another team to take it on willingly and either buy out themselves or let it run out is much higher and closer to the 2 1sts I said though, because they're willingly hamstringing themselves at that point, and the cost for that is much higher than the cost the team already in the situation will pay to get out, if that makes sense.
18 févr. à 1 h 5
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 2,096
Mentions "j'aime": 1,770
Quoting: Trevor31lv
Even worse, it's 7 of 8 cause they traded that 4th to get his rights.

Your point about Campbell is fair, but I think it's really only applicable to Edmonton's POV. Like, it only makes sense to trade so much to get out of him since they can also buy out. I'd argue the cost for another team to take it on willingly and either buy out themselves or let it run out is much higher and closer to the 2 1sts I said though, because they're willingly hamstringing themselves at that point, and the cost for that is much higher than the cost the team already in the situation will pay to get out, if that makes sense.


My bad there, yeah 7/8 years retaining is unthinkable.

And yeah, that makes sense for Campbell. It really depends on the team, if Montreal (a team with deep pockets and still a year or two away from really competing) was willing to take him on and buy him out, it might be worth it to them for a first. For a team like Columbus, a team that's got shallow pockets and arguably delusions of competing now....the price to do that would be a couple of firsts. For EDM, it's opportunity cost. Those firsts are critical for upgrading other parts of the roster for each run, so they're not going to spend such a significant asset when the buyout option is more attractive.
Trevor31lv a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage