SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Flames trades

Créé par: AdamL188
Équipe: 2023-24 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 15 févr. 2024
Publié: 15 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. Holtz, Alexander
  2. Stillman, Chase
  3. Vanecek, Vitek
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (NJD)
  5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2026 (NJD)
NJD
  1. Markström, Jacob (1 500 000 $ retained)
2.
CGY
  1. Berggren, Jonatan
  2. Määttä, Olli
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (DET)
  4. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (BOS)
DET
  1. Hanifin, Noah
Détails additionnels:
8x7.5 extension
3.
CGY
  1. Woo, Jett
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (VAN)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (VAN)
VAN
  1. Tanev, Christopher (2 250 000 $ retained)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de DET
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de NJD
Logo de CHI
Logo de CGY
2025
Logo de FLA
Logo de CGY
Logo de NJD
Logo de VAN
Logo de CGY
Logo de BOS
Logo de VAN
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2026
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de NJD
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2183 500 000 $75 651 666 $0 $1 062 500 $7 848 334 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
855 833 $855 833 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
775 000 $775 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD, C
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
16 févr. à 1 h 23
#51
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 6,864
Mentions "j'aime": 1,985
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Same sources said blockbuster will be announced 1 hour after games end.


Thx for calming me down Fan. See you all tomorrow
17 févr. à 2 h 22
#52
Dr_Invictus
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 2,278
Mentions "j'aime": 878
Quoting: dgibb10
And which team is offering that?? Go try and ask for another teams top prospect+1st and get laughed out of the room


Yeah, just like Lindholm wasn't going to get a 1st and a top prospect because "he was having a bad year".

Markstrom and Hanifin are having excellent seasons. Considering Markstrom is the only reason Calgary is winning games, teams will pay for that.
17 févr. à 2 h 30
#53
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 11,996
Mentions "j'aime": 3,176
Quoting: Dr_Invictus
Yeah, just like Lindholm wasn't going to get a 1st and a top prospect because "he was having a bad year".

Markstrom and Hanifin are having excellent seasons. Considering Markstrom is the only reason Calgary is winning games, teams will pay for that.


You didn’t get Willander or Lekky or even Raty.

For your Bruz comp you’d maybe be looking at Lenni
17 févr. à 2 h 32
#54
Dr_Invictus
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 2,278
Mentions "j'aime": 878
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Holtz being a top 6 caliber prospect is the only reason he is a fit over most winger prospects. Our glut is in the middle 6 but Holtz would be a prospect I take the risk on to be a top 6 caliber guy. I don't think there are enough teams offering center prospects out there for Markstrom. Buffalo would maybe make Savoie available but at 5'9 odds are he ends up as a winger in the NHL anyways. I also doubt Marky would waive to Buffalo.

When it comes to our pending UFA's like Hanifin and Tanev we can be more picky on positional need but not so much with Markstrom


I don't disagree with your premise. However, Markstrom doesn't need to be traded by the deadline. Buffalo has Ostlund as well and a glut of centers. I could see them swinging a deal in the summer.

Calgary only has 2 natural centers on the team, and I don't see Zary moving to Center. Yegor is serviceable, but not a solution long term. Calgary's need has been the same as the last 30 years: a top line center. The team will never go anywhere without one. It should be a priority when trading all assets.
17 févr. à 2 h 41
#55
Dr_Invictus
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 2,278
Mentions "j'aime": 878
Quoting: dgibb10
You didn’t get Willander or Lekky or even Raty.

For your Bruz comp you’d maybe be looking at Lenni


Bruz is the 3rd highest scorer in the OHL, as and RD. Dougie Hamilton and Rasmus Anderson were winners of the same scoring title. It was one of two positions Calgary needed, and Raty hasn't been exactly lighting it up, so Conroy got what we needed. You're just trying to rationalize NJ not having to give up anything tangible in ANY trade, which is ironic considering I'm saying we shouldn't want Holtz.
17 févr. à 2 h 47
#56
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 11,996
Mentions "j'aime": 3,176
Quoting: Dr_Invictus
Bruz is the 3rd highest scorer in the OHL, as and RD. Dougie Hamilton and Rasmus Anderson were winners of the same scoring title. It was one of two positions Calgary needed, and Raty hasn't been exactly lighting it up, so Conroy got what we needed. You're just trying to rationalize NJ not having to give up anything tangible in ANY trade, which is ironic considering I'm saying we shouldn't want Holtz.


The OHL is so much worse than it used to be.

Again, if you want that comp
1st, Lenni, Vanacek, 4th, Ethan Edwards for Hanifin.

25 1st just to specify.
17 févr. à 4 h 16
#57
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,538
Mentions "j'aime": 19,679
Quoting: Dr_Invictus
I don't disagree with your premise. However, Markstrom doesn't need to be traded by the deadline. Buffalo has Ostlund as well and a glut of centers. I could see them swinging a deal in the summer.

Calgary only has 2 natural centers on the team, and I don't see Zary moving to Center. Yegor is serviceable, but not a solution long term. Calgary's need has been the same as the last 30 years: a top line center. The team will never go anywhere without one. It should be a priority when trading all assets.


Oh I totally agree. Unless someone reaches Calgary's asking price there is no reason at all to trade Markstrom.

However, expecting a team to trade us a top line center caliber player or prospect is not at all realistic. We are probably going to have to draft that. Here's to hoping Cayden Lindstrom or Berkly Catton are available when Calgary makes their selection.
Dr_Invictus a aimé ceci.
17 févr. à 4 h 25
#58
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,538
Mentions "j'aime": 19,679
Quoting: dgibb10
The OHL is so much worse than it used to be.

Again, if you want that comp
1st, Lenni, Vanacek, 4th, Ethan Edwards for Hanifin.

25 1st just to specify.


Calgary would decline that. Lenni is a fine prospect but not one Calgary needs at all. Also Vanecek and Kuzmenko are not comparable. Vanecek has had 2 serviceable professional hockey seasons in his career, whereas Kuzmenko has had at least 6. The potential on Kuzmenko bouncing back and having positive value are just significantly higher. Siegenthaler is more in line with Kuzmenko than VV
18 févr. à 1 h 15
#59
Dr_Invictus
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 2,278
Mentions "j'aime": 878
Quoting: dgibb10
The OHL is so much worse than it used to be.

Again, if you want that comp
1st, Lenni, Vanacek, 4th, Ethan Edwards for Hanifin.

25 1st just to specify.


Time will tell. I'm interested to see how this plays out.
18 févr. à 1 h 16
#60
Dr_Invictus
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 2,278
Mentions "j'aime": 878
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Oh I totally agree. Unless someone reaches Calgary's asking price there is no reason at all to trade Markstrom.

However, expecting a team to trade us a top line center caliber player or prospect is not at all realistic. We are probably going to have to draft that. Here's to hoping Cayden Lindstrom or Berkly Catton are available when Calgary makes their selection.


I agree. You're really hoping for a Tage Thompson situation, or perhaps Wyatt Johnston, where the value isn't 💯 known until a year later
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage