SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Ducks 24-25

Créé par: Cabbie91
Équipe: 2024-25 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 15 févr. 2024
Publié: 15 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3950 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 250 000 $
12 250 000 $
1775 000 $
21 400 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
24 500 000 $
12 500 000 $
Transactions
ANA
  1. Barron, Justin [Droits de RFA]
  2. Dvorak, Christian
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (WPG)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (CGY)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de ANA
Logo de WPG
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de ANA
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2025
Logo de ANA
Logo de CGY
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2026
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2287 500 000 $65 144 167 $0 $6 550 000 $22 355 833 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 250 000 $$3M)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 6
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 650 000 $3 650 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
C, AG
RFA
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
775 000 $775 000 $
C
RFA
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD
UFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance800 000 $$800K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
844 167 $844 167 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
812 500 $812 500 $
G
RFA - 1
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DG
UFA
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DD
RFA
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DG/DD
RFA
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
15 févr. à 8 h 17
#1
Mr.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 3,793
Mentions "j'aime": 1,259
No
15 févr. à 8 h 19
#2
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,581
Mentions "j'aime": 25,433
Wrong draft picks. IF Trevor Zegras were on the market, and I don't believe for a minute that he is (in part because his trade value right now will never be lower), I would accept the Montreal 2024 first and 2025 second with Barron and the unwanted Dvorak.
15 févr. à 8 h 52
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 282
Mentions "j'aime": 135
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Wrong draft picks. IF Trevor Zegras were on the market, and I don't believe for a minute that he is (in part because his trade value right now will never be lower), I would accept the Montreal 2024 first and 2025 second with Barron and the unwanted Dvorak.


I agree it starts with the Habs 1st. Doubtful about the rest of the addons in your proposal. Maybe one of the 3 assets u listed.
15 févr. à 9 h 26
#4
I post sometimes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 5,777
Mentions "j'aime": 1,691
Quoting: Jacko
I agree it starts with the Habs 1st. Doubtful about the rest of the addons in your proposal. Maybe one of the 3 assets u listed.


I rather take my chances with the pick. Zegras was a top 10 pick... not a top 5. We can find a Zegras through the draft... and not have to pay him 7.8M+ next year.
Chuck54 a aimé ceci.
15 févr. à 9 h 37
#5
Yall gotta Chill
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 971
Mentions "j'aime": 185
Quoting: MTLaveragefan
I rather take my chances with the pick. Zegras was a top 10 pick... not a top 5. We can find a Zegras through the draft... and not have to pay him 7.8M+ next year.


Top 5 to 10's aren't always a sure thing. Next draft is ok but not GREAT! Zegras is a proven NHLer that can play, yeah his defensive skills aren't great,b ut he's 22 and if the Ducks are ready to part ways to get something in return, HABS should make a play since our great and best move ever by Hugues to carry the 2nd line has played less NHL games over the past 4 years than a 4th depth chart liner and isn't looking good for next year either. I'm one of the few who thinks we should've kept Romanov .. Dach ain't a sure player that can play 75% of a season.. He was a way too high risk for a 1st round pick. That's a bad Hugues move even if lots of peeps say Dach was a great move.. It would've been had he been able to play..

So I'd add the protected top 3, but other than that you don't get a Zegras in the Draft 2024 ready to play in the NHL. And his contract still as 2 more years, so no idea why indicate having to pay him 7.8M$ next year.

The only asset I'd remove here would be Dvorak, Duck don't need him, they can call up a younger player and understand they'll tank for another year to get better draft picks.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
15 févr. à 9 h 46
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 282
Mentions "j'aime": 135
Quoting: WhoCares_ItsAFantasyGame
Top 5 to 10's aren't always a sure thing. Next draft is ok but not GREAT! Zegras is a proven NHLer that can play, yeah his defensive skills aren't great,b ut he's 22 and if the Ducks are ready to part ways to get something in return, HABS should make a play since our great and best move ever by Hugues to carry the 2nd line has played less NHL games over the past 4 years than a 4th depth chart liner and isn't looking good for next year either. I'm one of the few who thinks we should've kept Romanov .. Dach ain't a sure player that can play 75% of a season.. He was a way too high risk for a 1st round pick. That's a bad Hugues move even if lots of peeps say Dach was a great move.. It would've been had he been able to play..

So I'd add the protected top 3, but other than that you don't get a Zegras in the Draft 2024 ready to play in the NHL. And his contract still as 2 more years, so no idea why indicate having to pay him 7.8M$ next year.

The only asset I'd remove here would be Dvorak, Duck don't need him, they can call up a younger player and understand they'll tank for another year to get better draft picks.


I agree mostly with you but his contract is a big deal...thats why the Ducks trying to trade him. You trading for a guy with 2 years of control
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage