SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Who I would have scouted in last nights game between Calgary and Boston

Créé par: sensonfire
Équipe: 2023-24 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 7 févr. 2024
Publié: 7 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
https://twitter.com/ShawnHutcheon/status/1755022207590318282
Transactions
1.
CGY
    This is who I would have scouted from the Flames.


    Hypothetically, we would be signing Tanev in the offseason instead of trading for him.
    2.
    3.
    BOS
      This is who I would have scouted from the Bruins.


      Not much here.


      Unless I wanted to be a typical AGM and make a big crazy trade that didn't make any sense.
      4.
      Rachats de contrats
      Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
      Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
      2024
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de DET
      Logo de TBL
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de OTT
      2025
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de OTT
      2026
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de OTT
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      2283 500 000 $79 767 380 $0 $1 850 000 $3 732 620 $
      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      8 205 714 $8 205 714 $
      AG
      UFA - 5
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      8 350 000 $8 350 000 $
      C
      UFA - 8
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
      AD, C
      NMC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      7 950 000 $7 950 000 $
      C
      UFA - 7
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      4 975 000 $4 975 000 $
      AD, AG
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      863 333 $863 333 $
      C, AG
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      775 000 $775 000 $
      C
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
      AD
      NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      762 500 $762 500 $
      AG
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      835 000 $835 000 $
      C, AD
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 1
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 850 000 $$2M)
      DG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
      DD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
      G
      M-NTC
      UFA - 5
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 5
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
      DG/DD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      775 000 $775 000 $
      G
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
      DG/DD, AG
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      805 000 $805 000 $
      DD
      RFA - 2
      Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
      DD
      NMC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
      G
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      775 000 $775 000 $
      AD, C
      UFA - 3

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner
      7 févr. à 21 h 19
      #1
      Bcarlo25
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2018
      Messages: 21,231
      Mentions "j'aime": 7,011
      why not scout some guys from boston that actually have a chance at moving?
      7 févr. à 21 h 20
      #2
      Démarrer sujet
      sensonfire
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: févr. 2021
      Messages: 11,894
      Mentions "j'aime": 4,466
      Quoting: Bcarlo25
      why not scout some guys from boston that actually have a chance at moving?


      Like who ?
      7 févr. à 21 h 23
      #3
      CGY
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: déc. 2015
      Messages: 5,544
      Mentions "j'aime": 2,066
      Likely scouting Tanev.

      Sens could trade for him to get a head start on courting him. Prevent him from ever hitting UFA.
      sensonfire a aimé ceci.
      7 févr. à 21 h 25
      #4
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 38,542
      Mentions "j'aime": 19,684
      Pelletier isn't getting moved, and Pospisil was just extended
      7 févr. à 21 h 25
      #5
      Démarrer sujet
      sensonfire
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: févr. 2021
      Messages: 11,894
      Mentions "j'aime": 4,466
      Quoting: ItWasIn
      Likely scouting Tanev.

      Sens could trade for him to get a head start on courting him. Prevent him from ever hitting UFA.


      We'll consider spending a 3rd on his signing rights next June.

      He'll probably be with a different team by then.
      7 févr. à 21 h 27
      #6
      Bcarlo25
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2018
      Messages: 21,231
      Mentions "j'aime": 7,011
      Quoting: sensonfire
      Like who ?


      Grzelcyk, Forbort, I would have said Poitras before the season ending surgery. That's probably it. One of Grzelcyk or Forbort could be moved to facilitate a bigger play.
      7 févr. à 21 h 29
      #7
      Démarrer sujet
      sensonfire
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: févr. 2021
      Messages: 11,894
      Mentions "j'aime": 4,466
      Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
      Pelletier isn't getting moved, and Pospisil was just extended


      Pospisill was signed after last night's game.

      We might have checked in if contract negotiations hit the rocks.

      But, more likely than not, we were there to see Tanev.
      Ledge_And_Dairy a aimé ceci.
      7 févr. à 21 h 34
      #8
      Démarrer sujet
      sensonfire
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: févr. 2021
      Messages: 11,894
      Mentions "j'aime": 4,466
      Quoting: Bcarlo25
      Grzelcyk, Forbort, I would have said Poitras before the season ending surgery. That's probably it. One of Grzelcyk or Forbort could be moved to facilitate a bigger play.


      1. Grzelcyk and Forbort are LDs.

      Ottawa is not interested.



      2. I figured Poitras was an untouchable bluechip prospect for the Bruins, given the season he's had up until this point.

      So, I avoided.



      3. Hypothetically, Ottawa would sign Heinen in the offseason instead of trading for him.

      And I'm not sure why Boston would be overly-protective of Lauko.
      7 févr. à 21 h 56
      #9
      Bcarlo25
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2018
      Messages: 21,231
      Mentions "j'aime": 7,011
      Quoting: sensonfire
      1. Grzelcyk and Forbort are LDs.

      Ottawa is not interested.



      2. I figured Poitras was an untouchable bluechip prospect for the Bruins, given the season he's had up until this point.

      So, I avoided.



      3. Hypothetically, Ottawa would sign Heinen in the offseason instead of trading for him.

      And I'm not sure why Boston would be overly-protective of Lauko.


      I am aware of what side the players on my favorite hockey team play, thank you.

      frankly, who ottawa has interest in doesn't matter one bit. this will be dictated by a first place hockey club looking to make tweaks. The conversation isn't, "oh, ottawa wants our right shot Ds? sure! we'll make that work!" Frankly, ottawa shouldn't care what side an expiring contract plays, they should be singularly focused on collecting value.

      Poitras i'm sure would have been available if it facilitated a long term fit at center. I'm guessing he was in the deal offered for Lindholm that fell apart because he wouldn't extend. Now he's out for the year so doesn't really matter.

      Both Heinen and Lauko (more so heinen) punch far above their contracts weight. For a cap strapped team, those guys are not moving.
      7 févr. à 22 h 54
      #10
      Démarrer sujet
      sensonfire
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: févr. 2021
      Messages: 11,894
      Mentions "j'aime": 4,466
      Quoting: Bcarlo25
      I am aware of what side the players on my favorite hockey team play, thank you.

      frankly, who ottawa has interest in doesn't matter one bit. this will be dictated by a first place hockey club looking to make tweaks. The conversation isn't, "oh, ottawa wants our right shot Ds? sure! we'll make that work!" Frankly, ottawa shouldn't care what side an expiring contract plays, they should be singularly focused on collecting value.

      Poitras i'm sure would have been available if it facilitated a long term fit at center. I'm guessing he was in the deal offered for Lindholm that fell apart because he wouldn't extend. Now he's out for the year so doesn't really matter.

      Both Heinen and Lauko (more so heinen) punch far above their contracts weight. For a cap strapped team, those guys are not moving.


      1. If who Ottawa has interest in doesn't matter, you wouldn't be telling me who to scout.

      Teams that are missing the playoffs don't buy expiring contracts unless it's needed for reasons relating to the cap.

      And Ottawa has too many LDs.

      There's no value to be collected by Ottawa from acquiring Grzelcyk or Forbort.



      2. Not every player that is scouted is traded for.

      In some cases, they are just signed as UFAs over the Summer.

      If we want Heinen, we'll just make an offer to him on July 1st and see if he takes it.
       
      Répondre
      To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
      Question:
      Options:
      Ajouter une option
      Soumettre le sondage