SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Next Year

Créé par: Kith
Équipe: 2024-25 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 1 févr. 2024
Publié: 1 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
If Pettersson and Lindholm mesh well and go deep look to convince them to leave a little money on the table to make a strong contender for their best years.

Setup all your role players to 2-3 year contracts to allow prospects and other opportunities to be seized.

Not sure if Tanev is the right answer for our #2 RHD but need to find a value player here to hold the position until Willander or another player fills the role.


This gets the majority of our roster through the hardest parts of the OEL Buyout and allows new players to overtake some of the Role players as they develop.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
66 000 000 $
811 500 000 $
21 100 000 $
2950 000 $
2900 000 $
2900 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
33 500 000 $
12 500 000 $
22 500 000 $
57 000 000 $
22 500 000 $
21 499 166 $
Transactions
VAN
    Anywhere so we dont have to play around with contracts to maximize Cap space and can accrue cap over the year
    Rachats de contrats
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2024
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de NJD
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de VAN
    2025
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    2026
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2287 500 000 $86 840 833 $0 $80 000 $659 167 $

    Formation

    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    11 500 000 $11 500 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
    C, AG, AD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    AG
    UFA
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
    AD, AG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    1 499 166 $1 499 166 $
    AD, C, AG
    UFA
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    DD
    RFA
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
    DG/DD
    NTC
    UFA - 2
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    DD
    UFA
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    G
    UFA
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    870 000 $870 000 $ (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
    DG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    775 000 $775 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    825 000 $825 000 $
    C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    775 000 $775 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    1 févr. à 16 h 16
    #1
    Judd Bracket ripoff
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 6,957
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,581
    probably id rather pass on blueger and play suter #C instead. free up some space to sign a decent 3rd pairing LHD.

    play Aman at 4C
    Prime_Jimbo a aimé ceci.
    1 févr. à 16 h 17
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 841
    Mentions "j'aime": 959
    Could see CHI taking mediocre veteran forwards but I think they might be ready to just let the kids play at D.

    VAN shouldn't have too much problem moving Poolman though, he's not terrible and his contract is not outrageous.
    1 févr. à 16 h 18
    #3
    VAN
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2022
    Messages: 6,182
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,883
    Too much for Blueger. Career fourth liner blowing up. Love to see it. Scared to pay $3.5M for it.
    bdb a aimé ceci.
    1 févr. à 16 h 28
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 352
    Mentions "j'aime": 56
    Tanev, Joshua and Hronek will definitely be more even if Pettersson and Lindstrom take a hair cut those other players will get a lot more on the open market.
    1 févr. à 16 h 32
    #5
    alwaysnextyear
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 5,529
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,568
    Have to identify the core and lock them up. If they can re-up Petey, Hronek and Lindholm, plus add Tanev on a decent deal then I'd be very happy. They'll likely have to find cheaper replacements for Blueger, Joshua, DeSmith and Lafferty to free up the cap space for the core signings though.
    1 févr. à 16 h 38
    #6
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2020
    Messages: 68
    Mentions "j'aime": 10
    Quoting: Prime_Jimbo
    Too much for Blueger. Career fourth liner blowing up. Love to see it. Scared to pay $3.5M for it.


    That line has just been so good, giving a short contract to both Joshua and Blueger to keep it together for 2 more years I think is worth it. I see him more like what JTM was on Tampa coming to Van, a good player on a strong team not getting the minutes because of the strength of the players in front of him. 3.5M could be a steal on a 3 year term with the cap going up and we get his best years allowing our Center Depth to develop to strong players in the AHL before pushing into the NHL.
    1 févr. à 16 h 40
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2017
    Messages: 19,079
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,404
    Move pius suter up and forget the Blue Teddybear. Vancouver looks to be a force to be reckoned with next season as well with a few decent moves.
    Garak a aimé ceci.
    1 févr. à 16 h 47
    #8
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2020
    Messages: 68
    Mentions "j'aime": 10
    Quoting: bdb
    Tanev, Joshua and Hronek will definitely be more even if Pettersson and Lindstrom take a hair cut those other players will get a lot more on the open market.


    Hronek had a great start for production but has fallen off a bit and everyone knows the reason his numbers are so good is from playing beside one of the most gifted puck moving defenseman in the NHL. 6x6 is a nice pay bump and I think he enjoys playing with Hughes enough to take it and run. If Tanev is more find another value D man for short term, he is an aging defensive D man and isnt physically big enough to punish opposing players, at 34 years it's what he is worth. Joshua might be worth more but he's not 2nd line material or 3C and teams are getting smarter about how much they spend on 3rd/4th line wingers there are enough value players he might get less on the market.
    1 févr. à 16 h 49
    #9
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2020
    Messages: 68
    Mentions "j'aime": 10
    Quoting: ginandtacos
    Could see CHI taking mediocre veteran forwards but I think they might be ready to just let the kids play at D.

    VAN shouldn't have too much problem moving Poolman though, he's not terrible and his contract is not outrageous.


    He's LTIR so doesnt take up an actual roster spot but helps get to the cap floor for bottom feeder teams
    1 févr. à 19 h 39
    #10
    AusCanuck
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 229
    Mentions "j'aime": 97
    Quoting: ginandtacos
    Could see CHI taking mediocre veteran forwards but I think they might be ready to just let the kids play at D.

    VAN shouldn't have too much problem moving Poolman though, he's not terrible and his contract is not outrageous.


    Poolman has been LTIRetired for about 2 years
    1 févr. à 20 h 10
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 10,875
    Mentions "j'aime": 10,672
    Quoting: ginandtacos
    Could see CHI taking mediocre veteran forwards but I think they might be ready to just let the kids play at D.

    VAN shouldn't have too much problem moving Poolman though, he's not terrible and his contract is not outrageous.


    Poolman is essentially LTIRetired, if I'm not mistaken. He played 3 games last year and hasn't played since.
    2 févr. à 11 h 46
    #12
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 841
    Mentions "j'aime": 959
    My mistake, I'm obviously thinking of the wrong guy.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage