SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Deadline

Créé par: edonutz
Équipe: 2023-24 Kings de Los Angeles
Date de création initiale: 1 févr. 2024
Publié: 1 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
LAK
  1. Fortescue, Drew [Liste de réserve]
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (NYR)
2.
LAK
  1. Ullmark, Linus (2 000 000 $ retained)
BOS
  1. Grundström, Carl
  2. Kaliyev, Arthur
  3. Rittich, David
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (LAK)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Frais de résiliation
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de NYR
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2025
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2026
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2183 500 000 $83 596 667 $0 $6 132 500 $-96 667 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 200 000 $4 200 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
875 000 $875 000 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
775 000 $775 000 $
C, AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance1 550 000 $$2M)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
DG
UFA - 8
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
G
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
820 000 $820 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
G
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
1 févr. à 15 h 59
#1
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,218
Mentions "j'aime": 7,008
put yourself in boston's shoes. what possible reason would you have to make this trade?
1 févr. à 16 h 3
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 179
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: Bcarlo25
put yourself in boston's shoes. what possible reason would you have to make this trade?


Swayman's your number 1 and that bottom 6...
1 févr. à 16 h 9
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 1,261
Mentions "j'aime": 730
No from Boston. Not moving him for 2 fourth liners and definitely not retaining.
1 févr. à 16 h 10
#4
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,218
Mentions "j'aime": 7,008
Quoting: edonutz
Swayman's your number 1 and that bottom 6...


have you seen the bruins roster? i'm not sure any of these guys crack the lineup. A legitimate shot at ullmark would include either:
1. such an extreme overpay with futures that the bruins could flip those assets for something at the top of the lineup thats impactful, or
2. a legit 1C, or
3. a legit 2C that's young.

without that, move along, bruins will happily keep him.
1 févr. à 16 h 11
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,560
Mentions "j'aime": 6,150
Ullmark is not the answer for the Kings.
1 févr. à 16 h 12
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 179
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: Bcarlo25
have you seen the bruins roster? i'm not sure any of these guys crack the lineup. A legitimate shot at ullmark would include either:
1. such an extreme overpay with futures that the bruins could flip those assets for something at the top of the lineup thats impactful, or
2. a legit 1C, or
3. a legit 2C that's young.

without that, move along, bruins will happily keep him.


Alright yeah I'm passing on that price. Kaliyev easily moves to your top prospect. I get it he's a "4th liner" right now but he hasn't been deployed properly here.
1 févr. à 16 h 23
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 179
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: tkecanuck341
Ullmark is not the answer for the Kings.


What is the answer for the Kings all wise and knowing tkecanuck
1 févr. à 16 h 23
#8
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,218
Mentions "j'aime": 7,008
Quoting: edonutz
Alright yeah I'm passing on that price. Kaliyev easily moves to your top prospect. I get it he's a "4th liner" right now but he hasn't been deployed properly here.


he's not a prospect, he's been in the NHL for three years. can't just build a trade for value, has to be fit as well. this is the bruins basically just giving away the goalie that just won the vezina, while they're sitting atop the east. oh, and retaining when they're up against the cap. doesn't make much sense, does it?
1 févr. à 16 h 27
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 179
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: Bcarlo25
he's not a prospect, he's been in the NHL for three years. can't just build a trade for value, has to be fit as well. this is the bruins basically just giving away the goalie that just won the vezina, while they're sitting atop the east. oh, and retaining when they're up against the cap. doesn't make much sense, does it?


The vezina year is looking more and more like the outlier year in his career, doesn't it?

Shoulda sold him in the offseason is if you ever wanted a 1C return.
SwarmChair a aimé ceci.
1 févr. à 16 h 31
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 816
Mentions "j'aime": 240
Ya I doubt 2 4th liners, an old backup goalie, and a 2nd pull Ullmark with retention

Buins dont have much reason to move Ullmark right now, so it'd take an irrefusable offer to get him
1 févr. à 16 h 33
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 1,023
Mentions "j'aime": 330
Quoting: Bcarlo25
have you seen the bruins roster? i'm not sure any of these guys crack the lineup. A legitimate shot at ullmark would include either:
1. such an extreme overpay with futures that the bruins could flip those assets for something at the top of the lineup thats impactful, or
2. a legit 1C, or
3. a legit 2C that's young.

without that, move along, bruins will happily keep him.


Ullmark is a .910 goalie on most teams out of Boston. So keep dreaming for that 1C I guess.
1 févr. à 16 h 34
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,560
Mentions "j'aime": 6,150
Quoting: edonutz
What is the answer for the Kings all wise and knowing tkecanuck


A rental or short-term goaltender with a ~1M cap hit.

Someone like Charlie Lindgren from Washington or Kevin Lankinen from Nashville (the latter with retention).
1 févr. à 16 h 53
#13
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,218
Mentions "j'aime": 7,008
Quoting: SwarmChair
Ullmark is a .910 goalie on most teams out of Boston. So keep dreaming for that 1C I guess.


i'm not dreaming of it. i don't want them to move ullmark.
1 févr. à 16 h 54
#14
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,218
Mentions "j'aime": 7,008
Quoting: edonutz
The vezina year is looking more and more like the outlier year in his career, doesn't it?

Shoulda sold him in the offseason is if you ever wanted a 1C return.


of course that was an outlier. it was a historic season.

he's still been a pretty high end goalie though.
1 févr. à 21 h 48
#15
Bahstun
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 81
Mentions "j'aime": 14
How about Arvidsson, Spence and Copley for Ullmark, Zboril and Harrison??
4 févr. à 16 h 16
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,803
Mentions "j'aime": 1,178
Quoting: SwarmChair
Ullmark is a .910 goalie on most teams out of Boston. So keep dreaming for that 1C I guess.


Just curious. He’s top 10 in goals saved above expected per 60 at .447, which is a stat that adjusts for save difficulty. That number would be top 5 most years in the past 8 years.

It was supposed to be Copley who stepped up, but he sucked. It was supposed to be Talbott, but he’s regressed to the mean. Now it is another journeyman AHL type who’s looked good to date. At some point, maybe Blake needs to revisit his position before he’s fired.

When he came from Buffalo, Ullmark was a fundamentally below average goalie. He’s actually very sound right now. I keep on hearing people diminish him when he’s done nothing but play extremely well.

He needs to stay healthy for the playoffs, but even his cursory stats adjusted for expected goals were solid last year. Would have expected more in the playoffs, but he reportedly wasn’t healthy.

Minimizing him because he had an incredible season followed up by a good one is an interesting strategy.
6 févr. à 4 h 36
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,803
Mentions "j'aime": 1,178
Modifié 6 févr. à 4 h 42
Quoting: edonutz
Alright yeah I'm passing on that price. Kaliyev easily moves to your top prospect. I get it he's a "4th liner" right now but he hasn't been deployed properly here.


Fabian Lysell, Mason Lohrei, and Matt Poitras are all easily more valuable prospects esoecially with how Lysell is playing in Providence the past two months.

Kaliyev has had a bad year. The only positive about that is he should be open to a cheap bridge deal. I’d consider a third for him or a prospect swap though I’m not sure there is a good fit for a straight swap there.

I think the Bruins should give Lysell a shot before trying to acquire a guy like him. My guess is you wouldn’t get a lot and his talent is probably worth keeping.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage