SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Is it possible

Créé par: zibby805
Équipe: 2023-24 Lightning de Tampa Bay
Date de création initiale: 30 janv. 2024
Publié: 30 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
TBL
  1. Hanifin, Noah
  2. Lindholm, Elias
Détails additionnels:
Gotta think Calgary would love the signed defenseman
CGY
  1. Sergachev, Mikhail
Détails additionnels:
Ntc doesn’t kick in until off-season
2.
WSH
  1. Sheary, Conor
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (TBL)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de MIN
2025
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de MIN
2026
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $78 854 165 $0 $0 $4 645 835 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 8
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
2 665 000 $2 665 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
C, AG
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
776 665 $776 665 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
5 200 000 $5 200 000 $
DD
UFA - 8
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
775 000 $775 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
775 000 $775 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
762 500 $762 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
762 500 $762 500 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
30 janv. à 22 h 34
#1
boltsfan71
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 1,908
Mentions "j'aime": 675
dont think tampa could even pay them both
30 janv. à 22 h 38
#2
Future Norris guy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 15,605
Mentions "j'aime": 8,625
laugh Trade Sergachev for two players you've zero chance in hell of re-signing, Hanifin and Lindholm combined will cost you $16,000,000 Lindholm $8,500,000 and Hanifin $7,500,000 Neither is signing with a team that's on the decline.
30 janv. à 22 h 38
#3
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,965
Mentions "j'aime": 22,930
Original thought on the trade. Flames would have to think Sergachev is worth his 8.5m contract to do the deal. More likely they get futures for Hanifan and Lindholm and then could spend 8.5m better than Sergachev.
30 janv. à 22 h 40
#4
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,965
Mentions "j'aime": 22,930
Quoting: boltsfan71
dont think tampa could even pay them both


That's not the point. Improves the team this year, and then have 8.5m to spend next season(s) by not having Sergachev.
30 janv. à 22 h 42
#5
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,965
Mentions "j'aime": 22,930
Quoting: MoSeider53
laugh Trade Sergachev for two players you've zero chance in hell of re-signing, Hanifin and Lindholm combined will cost you $16,000,000 Lindholm $8,500,000 and Hanifin $7,500,000 Neither is signing with a team that's on the decline.


????? Teams acquire upcoming UFAs at TDL for a playoff run with no intention (or cap) to resigning these players. Just for this season it makes Tampa better. The question is can Tampa replace Sergachev effectively for under 8.5m in future years.
30 janv. à 22 h 45
#6
Future Norris guy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 15,605
Mentions "j'aime": 8,625
Quoting: palhal
????? Teams acquire upcoming UFAs at TDL for a playoff run with no intention (or cap) to resigning these players. Just for this season it makes Tampa better. The question is can Tampa replace Sergachev effectively for under 8.5m in future years.


There's noway that Julien Brisebois is giving up Mikhail Sergachev for two rentals, No sane GM is making that trade.
30 janv. à 22 h 46
#7
boltsfan71
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 1,908
Mentions "j'aime": 675
Quoting: palhal
That's not the point. Improves the team this year, and then have 8.5m to spend next season(s) by not having Sergachev.


they're not gonna give up sergachev for rentals
30 janv. à 23 h 2
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 366
Mentions "j'aime": 36
Quoting: boltsfan71
they're not gonna give up sergachev for rentals


Quoting: MoSeider53
There's noway that Julien Brisebois is giving up Mikhail Sergachev for two rentals, No sane GM is making that trade.


Quoting: palhal
????? Teams acquire upcoming UFAs at TDL for a playoff run with no intention (or cap) to resigning these players. Just for this season it makes Tampa better. The question is can Tampa replace Sergachev effectively for under 8.5m in future years.


Quoting: palhal
That's not the point. Improves the team this year, and then have 8.5m to spend next season(s) by not having Sergachev.


Quoting: palhal
Original thought on the trade. Flames would have to think Sergachev is worth his 8.5m contract to do the deal. More likely they get futures for Hanifan and Lindholm and then could spend 8.5m better than Sergachev.


Quoting: MoSeider53
laugh Trade Sergachev for two players you've zero chance in hell of re-signing, Hanifin and Lindholm combined will cost you $16,000,000 Lindholm $8,500,000 and Hanifin $7,500,000 Neither is signing with a team that's on the decline.


Quoting: boltsfan71
dont think tampa could even pay them both


I don’t think they would be rentals and there is a Florida discount.. I put up part2 with the renewal contracts.
30 janv. à 23 h 41
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 6,764
Mentions "j'aime": 2,546
Quoting: palhal
????? Teams acquire upcoming UFAs at TDL for a playoff run with no intention (or cap) to resigning these players. Just for this season it makes Tampa better. The question is can Tampa replace Sergachev effectively for under 8.5m in future years.


Not guys they just signed to 8 year extensions in year 1
30 janv. à 23 h 45
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 366
Mentions "j'aime": 36
Quoting: Boltsbeathabs
Not guys they just signed to 8 year extensions in year 1


Even with a player who has been awful ever sense the extension kicked in
30 janv. à 23 h 46
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 6,764
Mentions "j'aime": 2,546
Quoting: zibby805
Even with a player who has been awful ever sense the extension kicked in


That would be the start of this year what part of they don't trade the guy in the first year of the extension are you not smart enough to understand? I realized he signed it before the start of last year however if you think he played awful last year you are the absolute worst talent evaluator EVER!!!!!!
30 janv. à 23 h 48
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 8,038
Mentions "j'aime": 3,236
Caps pass. They'll get a 1st or a couple 2nds for Dowd.
30 janv. à 23 h 55
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 6,764
Mentions "j'aime": 2,546
Quoting: ClockReads2113
Caps pass. They'll get a 1st or a couple 2nds for Dowd.


Willie Nelson called wants his smoke back
31 janv. à 0 h 0
#14
Fantasy Hockey Pro
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 5,190
Mentions "j'aime": 2,301
Sheary and a second Dowd would be an accept from the caps imo. He was great here
31 janv. à 9 h 14
#15
Craig Laughlin Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 5,322
Mentions "j'aime": 5,746
Upgrade the pick with Sheary and it's probably fine.
31 janv. à 9 h 25
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 8,038
Mentions "j'aime": 3,236
Quoting: Boltsbeathabs
Willie Nelson called wants his smoke back


Yall literally paid a 1st for Goodrow LOL Dowd is better than him.
31 janv. à 11 h 26
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 6,764
Mentions "j'aime": 2,546
Quoting: ClockReads2113
Yall literally paid a 1st for Goodrow LOL Dowd is better than him.


Goodrow was cheaper and at the time better than Died is now.
31 janv. à 11 h 57
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 8,038
Mentions "j'aime": 3,236
Quoting: Boltsbeathabs
Goodrow was cheaper and at the time better than Died is now.


At the time Goodrow's cap hit was 1.13% of the cap, Dowd's is 1.5%, so you're splitting hairs there. They are are about the same offensively (Dowd 0.29 since joining Caps, Goodrow 0.26 when with SJS). Analytically Dowd is slightly better as well, especially defensively. So across the board they are basically the same at the same time they were traded except Goodrow was younger, but Dowd is also a center and better on the PK and played bigger minutes. Dowd is easily getting a late or at the very least a couple 2nds.
31 janv. à 12 h 37
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 6,764
Mentions "j'aime": 2,546
Quoting: ClockReads2113
At the time Goodrow's cap hit was 1.13% of the cap, Dowd's is 1.5%, so you're splitting hairs there. They are are about the same offensively (Dowd 0.29 since joining Caps, Goodrow 0.26 when with SJS). Analytically Dowd is slightly better as well, especially defensively. So across the board they are basically the same at the same time they were traded except Goodrow was younger, but Dowd is also a center and better on the PK and played bigger minutes. Dowd is easily getting a late or at the very least a couple 2nds.


Goodrow was also a Center that got moved to wing that TB team was loaded w Centers. Point Cirelli, Stamkos, Johnson, Gourde, Goodrow, Paquette.
31 janv. à 13 h 47
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 8,038
Mentions "j'aime": 3,236
Quoting: Boltsbeathabs
Goodrow was also a Center that got moved to wing that TB team was loaded w Centers. Point Cirelli, Stamkos, Johnson, Gourde, Goodrow, Paquette.


Looks like he played both in SJS. Of his top 5 lines he was on he was center on just 2 of them.
31 janv. à 16 h 36
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 6,764
Mentions "j'aime": 2,546
Quoting: ClockReads2113
Looks like he played both in SJS. Of his top 5 lines he was on he was center on just 2 of them.


Again a natural center who did what was in the best interest if the team.
31 janv. à 21 h 54
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 8,038
Mentions "j'aime": 3,236
Quoting: Boltsbeathabs
Again a natural center who did what was in the best interest if the team.


Perfect, so they are so very similar. Dowd will get a similar package.
31 janv. à 22 h 7
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 6,764
Mentions "j'aime": 2,546
Quoting: ClockReads2113
Perfect, so they are so very similar. Dowd will get a similar package.


4 years older, slower, 400k more expensive with less available cap space next year. Thanks but no
31 janv. à 22 h 11
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 8,038
Mentions "j'aime": 3,236
Quoting: Boltsbeathabs
4 years older, slower, 400k more expensive with less available cap space next year. Thanks but no


Yet still better than Goodrow was then and now. He'll get a similar package.
31 janv. à 22 h 13
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 6,764
Mentions "j'aime": 2,546
Quoting: ClockReads2113
Yet still better than Goodrow was then and now. He'll get a similar package.


Good luck
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage