SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Selling After The Break

Créé par: KingExLeafs
Équipe: 2023-24 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 30 janv. 2024
Publié: 30 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
EDM
  1. Bertuzzi, Tyler (2 750 000 $ retained)
2.
TOR
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (NJD)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (VAN)
VAN
  1. Domi, Max (1 500 000 $ retained)
3.
TOR
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (LAK)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de EDM
Logo de NYI
Logo de TOR
Logo de NJD
Logo de TOR
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de VAN
Logo de TOR
Logo de LAK
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2026
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $75 331 450 $0 $0 $8 168 550 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
796 667 $796 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
766 667 $766 667 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
875 000 $875 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
30 janv. à 15 h 51
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,166
Mentions "j'aime": 9,392
Domi isn’t returning more than he did last season when he was playing much better
BrockChoy a aimé ceci.
30 janv. à 15 h 55
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 4,126
Mentions "j'aime": 621
Quoting: mv21227
Domi isn’t returning more than he did last season when he was playing much better


He was getting more minutes last year on a bad team in Chicago. Given opportunity in a top six role his numbers will increase.
30 janv. à 15 h 57
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 403
Mentions "j'aime": 163
no chance they sell
30 janv. à 15 h 57
#4
Tank it baby
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 6,240
Mentions "j'aime": 4,273
I just can't see Shammy selling.
30 janv. à 16 h 2
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 667
Mentions "j'aime": 201
Quoting: mv21227
Domi isn’t returning more than he did last season when he was playing much better


I do like Domi for the Canucks. I think he probably gets about a 2nd, so this is about reasonable. I do think his good playoffs last year probably helps his value and the fact that he scored more points with a bigger opportunity in Chicago last year during the regular season last year probably isn't a mark against him.

I don't think Leafs are selling like this.
30 janv. à 16 h 7
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 967
Mentions "j'aime": 423
Sammy is ranked 47 out of 55 goaltenders this year currently. The almost worst goaltender in the league does not get a return of a 3rd, you'd be lucky to get a 5th at 50% retained. And even at 50% retained the Kings want absolutely nothing to do with him, that is a broken man all due to the Leafs media and fan base so keep your Frankenstein.
30 janv. à 16 h 8
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,166
Mentions "j'aime": 9,392
Quoting: KingExLeafs
He was getting more minutes last year on a bad team in Chicago. Given opportunity in a top six role his numbers will increase.


Canucks wouldn’t give more than a 3rd for him. Even then not sure they’d even be interested. Only has 4 goals, having a down year offensively, and is awful defensively
30 janv. à 16 h 10
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,166
Mentions "j'aime": 9,392
Quoting: SGB88
I do like Domi for the Canucks. I think he probably gets about a 2nd, so this is about reasonable. I do think his good playoffs last year probably helps his value and the fact that he scored more points with a bigger opportunity in Chicago last year during the regular season last year probably isn't a mark against him.

I don't think Leafs are selling like this.


I’d much rather Bertuzzi over Domi if we make a trade with Toronto
30 janv. à 16 h 20
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 429
Mentions "j'aime": 273
If anything Toronto would be bringing in someone for a playoff run if there's any cap space available
30 janv. à 16 h 23
#10
We Need D!!
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2023
Messages: 1,241
Mentions "j'aime": 354
I am not against doing this to get some draft capital back. But you’re asking for too high of draft picks even with retention. If they make a couple of these moves early they can maybe go after some D and F depth with term. PS Brodie needs to be in that sell. Doesn’t matter what he goes for, but that cap space is much more valuable than he is.
30 janv. à 16 h 39
#11
Iglesias
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 485
Mentions "j'aime": 291
Samsonov was just on waivers for free
30 janv. à 16 h 40
#12
Beargold
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 416
Mentions "j'aime": 165
Quoting: SGB88
I do like Domi for the Canucks. I think he probably gets about a 2nd, so this is about reasonable. I do think his good playoffs last year probably helps his value and the fact that he scored more points with a bigger opportunity in Chicago last year during the regular season last year probably isn't a mark against him.

I don't think Leafs are selling like this.


I don't think Domi would fit the Canucks. As mentioned, he is an absolutely defensive liability and just kind of throws the puck into the slot and hopes for the best. He'd be a 4th liner at best for the Canucks and be scratched worse than Kuzmenko since Domi can't even score. Lafferty >>>> Domi
30 janv. à 16 h 51
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 3,789
Mentions "j'aime": 1,208
Canucks accept.
Domi mentioned that he loves coach Rick.
He could be a good fit for the Canucks 🤔
He usually plays on the second line or third line with the Leafs.
30 janv. à 17 h 18
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 667
Mentions "j'aime": 201
Quoting: Beargold
I don't think Domi would fit the Canucks. As mentioned, he is an absolutely defensive liability and just kind of throws the puck into the slot and hopes for the best. He'd be a 4th liner at best for the Canucks and be scratched worse than Kuzmenko since Domi can't even score. Lafferty >>>> Domi


Quoting: mv21227
I’d much rather Bertuzzi over Domi if we make a trade with Toronto


I think the fact he's a center actually really matters. I think him with Miller on the wing could be interesting. Miller can be elite on the wing defensively, and that would be a very heavy forecheck that would fit Tocchet's system well. Worst case scenario you move him to wing, and I think he can play in the top 6 just fine.

https://edge.nhl.com/en/compare/skaters/20232024-regular-8477503-20232024-regular-8483808

I think his speed really matches what the Canucks want to do.
Beargold a aimé ceci.
30 janv. à 18 h 55
#15
Beargold
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 416
Mentions "j'aime": 165
Quoting: SGB88
I think the fact he's a center actually really matters. I think him with Miller on the wing could be interesting. Miller can be elite on the wing defensively, and that would be a very heavy forecheck that would fit Tocchet's system well. Worst case scenario you move him to wing, and I think he can play in the top 6 just fine.

https://edge.nhl.com/en/compare/skaters/20232024-regular-8477503-20232024-regular-8483808

I think his speed really matches what the Canucks want to do.


I just don't think his responsibility (or lack thereof) while attempting to be a play maker is what VAN should be after. Sportsnet has a pretty good article about the Leafs as a whole, but it highlights some of what I'm talking about with Domi trying to force offense rather than play reliably: https://www.sportsnet.ca/nhl/article/systems-analyst-how-one-oilers-goal-highlighted-maple-leafs-biggest-issues/

VAN is after a centre, and it is important that Domi can play that, but I think it would create more headaches than it would solve if they were to try and bring him in. In a perfect world, I'd say Drury (CAR) or Frost (PHI) but they'd be quite expensive and neither of their respective teams would have much interest in trading them.. Guess it's Henrique, lol.
30 janv. à 20 h 25
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 667
Mentions "j'aime": 201
Quoting: Beargold
I just don't think his responsibility (or lack thereof) while attempting to be a play maker is what VAN should be after. Sportsnet has a pretty good article about the Leafs as a whole, but it highlights some of what I'm talking about with Domi trying to force offense rather than play reliably: https://www.sportsnet.ca/nhl/article/systems-analyst-how-one-oilers-goal-highlighted-maple-leafs-biggest-issues/

VAN is after a centre, and it is important that Domi can play that, but I think it would create more headaches than it would solve if they were to try and bring him in. In a perfect world, I'd say Drury (CAR) or Frost (PHI) but they'd be quite expensive and neither of their respective teams would have much interest in trading them.. Guess it's Henrique, lol.


I'd love Frost. I don't know if he's still in the doghouse with Torts and so I'm not sure if he's available now frown

Looking at the link, the analysis is off, that is the story of Knies making mistake after mistake. Domi is a little in elegant in a couple spot, but all in all is good. The pass in the play is fine and in the other plays in the montage they are also fine, the problem is the Leafs just don't battle for pucks.

Especially in the play broken down when the puck goes across there is no way the Edmonton player should end up on top of Knies, that should be a least a 50/50 puck and there's no way he should be able to move out with speed. Domi should be pressuring Edmonton skater through the neutral zone, and although he does it a little inelegantly, it's hard to say if that is his fault or a system's fault. However, it works. Edmonton get's completely crossed up and yeah they enter the zone, but they do so without speed, out formation and all bunched up. Domi gets back to his own guy and is just about to take him but Knies comes streaking back with speed and takes him. That's fine, but he's taken the center position. Domi does what he's supposed to and swaps with Knies, but then Knies doesn't take the position he's taken. Imagine if a forward covered for a D and then just wandered off back to forward before the D swapped back with him. It would be on the person holding the position.

It's not surprising, Knies is a rookie, but man that is the story of Knies making multiple mistakes and honestly Domi looks pretty good to me. The pass doesn't connect, but is dangerous and can lead to a high danger chance. More importantly, the downside is very low, until Knies just doesn't battle. If Knies battles the Leafs actually are in a good spot since the puck is basically in the opposite corner, where Edmonton doesn't have support. If Knies didn't try to take the puck and on the inside and takes the player on the outside, this looks great.
31 janv. à 11 h 41
#17
Beargold
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 416
Mentions "j'aime": 165
Quoting: SGB88
I'd love Frost. I don't know if he's still in the doghouse with Torts and so I'm not sure if he's available now frown

Looking at the link, the analysis is off, that is the story of Knies making mistake after mistake. Domi is a little in elegant in a couple spot, but all in all is good. The pass in the play is fine and in the other plays in the montage they are also fine, the problem is the Leafs just don't battle for pucks.

Especially in the play broken down when the puck goes across there is no way the Edmonton player should end up on top of Knies, that should be a least a 50/50 puck and there's no way he should be able to move out with speed. Domi should be pressuring Edmonton skater through the neutral zone, and although he does it a little inelegantly, it's hard to say if that is his fault or a system's fault. However, it works. Edmonton get's completely crossed up and yeah they enter the zone, but they do so without speed, out formation and all bunched up. Domi gets back to his own guy and is just about to take him but Knies comes streaking back with speed and takes him. That's fine, but he's taken the center position. Domi does what he's supposed to and swaps with Knies, but then Knies doesn't take the position he's taken. Imagine if a forward covered for a D and then just wandered off back to forward before the D swapped back with him. It would be on the person holding the position.

It's not surprising, Knies is a rookie, but man that is the story of Knies making multiple mistakes and honestly Domi looks pretty good to me. The pass doesn't connect, but is dangerous and can lead to a high danger chance. More importantly, the downside is very low, until Knies just doesn't battle. If Knies battles the Leafs actually are in a good spot since the puck is basically in the opposite corner, where Edmonton doesn't have support. If Knies didn't try to take the puck and on the inside and takes the player on the outside, this looks great.


I think I view the Edmonton play a bit differently. He had solid possession of the puck and there was a better play along the boards; there's no reason to turn it into a 50/50 puck battle in that instance. Especially when your team is up by 1. A risky high-danger move isn't the best play, especially in Tocchet's system, and Domi hasn't had a lot of success with them this year with just 20 assists to the season despite playing with some really talented scorers.

While Knies definitely played too passively, but even after the turnover Domi makes a misread in the neutral zone. He puts pressure on McLead despite not having his teammates back defensively and gives them easy access into the Leafs' end while also jumbling things up more. If Domi had played smarter throughout that particular play the Leafs may have held possession in the offensive zone at best, or even if they turned it over and the Oilers came back, Domi could've stayed at the first forward back (being the centre and all) and covered his guy; preventing the mix up by Knies.

Knies definitely fed into the mix up defensively, but I see that initial turnover as more of Domi's mistake than his. Knies is a rookie and gets a bit more forgiveness in my mind for that play, but Domi is a vet and should know that playing safe is better in those instances.

Of course, we're talking about one specific play. A miniscule sample size isn't the best way to analyse it, but I do think some of the passes in the video demonstrate the same problems; only the last one against Detroit and the one against the Islanders though (the rest are risky but I am okay with the play).
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage