SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Monahan wont be a NYR

Créé par: Rags21
Équipe: 2023-24 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 29 janv. 2024
Publié: 29 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
While an ideal fit, Staple says Drury won’t likely reach out to Habs due to bad blood. “A person who talks to the Canadiens regularly said Montreal’s front office has believed for a while now that there’s no chance Drury reaches out to Kent Hughes”

https://theathletic.com/5232218/2024/01/29/new-york-rangers-trade-deadline-targets-filip-chytil/
Transactions
1.
2.
BUF
    Long shot
    3.
    4.
    WSH
    5.
    6.
    7.
    Rachats de contrats
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2024
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de NYR
    2025
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de NYR
    2026
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de VAN
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2883 500 000 $92 227 595 $610 892 $882 500 $-8 727 595 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
    AG
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
    AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
    AG
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
    C, AD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    800 000 $800 000 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
    AD
    NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    2 325 000 $2 325 000 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    3 641 667 $3 641 667 $
    C, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    800 000 $800 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    828 333 $828 333 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
    AG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    762 500 $762 500 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    787 500 $787 500 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
    AG, C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Predators de Nashville
    800 000 $800 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    AG, C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    3 571 429 $3 571 429 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    3 872 000 $3 872 000 $
    DG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    5 666 667 $5 666 667 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    DG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
    DD
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    825 000 $825 000 $ (Bonis de performance100 000 $$100K)
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    825 000 $825 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
    DD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    812 500 $812 500 $
    DG
    RFA - 2
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    4 437 500 $4 437 500 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 4

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    29 janv. à 9 h 19
    #1
    GM
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2022
    Messages: 4,028
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,811
    I'm a Nic Dowd kind of a guy myself. Buy it depends. Now way I give a first for him. If WSH wants too much and Wennberg goes for like a 3rd. I pick Wennberg
    29 janv. à 9 h 22
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2021
    Messages: 6,477
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,779
    Quoting: AG_sweden
    I'm a Nic Dowd kind of a guy myself. Buy it depends. Now way I give a first for him. If WSH wants too much and Wennberg goes for like a 3rd. I pick Wennberg


    Seems like a Lavi guy, but my only problem is do we want Dowd playing 3C? Is he capable to play 3C?
    AG_sweden a aimé ceci.
    29 janv. à 9 h 27
    #3
    Craig Laughlin Fan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2019
    Messages: 5,326
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,750
    Quoting: Rags21
    Seems like a Lavi guy, but my only problem is do we want Dowd playing 3C? Is he capable to play 3C?


    He certainly plays enough in DC to be considered a 3C. Going to be expensive to get though I imagine, don't think MacLellan is too keen on trading in-division.
    Rags21 a aimé ceci.
    29 janv. à 9 h 29
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 5,887
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,847
    Schneider and your 1st Top 10 protected
    Shibbal18 et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
    29 janv. à 9 h 30
    #5
    GM
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2022
    Messages: 4,028
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,811
    Quoting: Rags21
    Seems like a Lavi guy, but my only problem is do we want Dowd playing 3C? Is he capable to play 3C?


    Better than Brodzinski. But in general WSH makes sense because of Lavi system familiarity. Kubel would be option too.
    29 janv. à 9 h 32
    #6
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2021
    Messages: 6,477
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,779
    Quoting: AG_sweden
    Better than Brodzinski. But in general WSH makes sense because of Lavi system familiarity. Kubel would be option too.


    Well brodzinski and cuylle have good chemistry going right now. I wouldn’t mind cuylle-dowd-brodzinski if Drury doesn’t like what he sees at the TDL (wheeler should be odd man out)
    AG_sweden a aimé ceci.
    29 janv. à 9 h 35
    #7
    GM
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2022
    Messages: 4,028
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,811
    Quoting: Rags21
    Well brodzinski and cuylle have good chemistry going right now. I wouldn’t mind cuylle-dowd-brodzinski if Drury doesn’t like what he sees at the TDL (wheeler should be odd man out)


    Yeah but Dowd can be 4th line C between Goody and Vesey in that case.
    29 janv. à 9 h 40
    #8
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2021
    Messages: 6,477
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,779
    Quoting: BUFF36
    Schneider and your 1st Top 10 protected


    Definitely not for a 3C lol
    Just_A_Guess et AG_sweden a aimé ceci.
    29 janv. à 9 h 49
    #9
    Shibbal18
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2016
    Messages: 25,610
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,209
    Rangers have a lot they could swap for Mitts. Schneider, Trouba, Mancini as a throw in
    29 janv. à 9 h 52
    #10
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2021
    Messages: 6,477
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,779
    Quoting: Shibbal18
    Rangers have a lot they could swap for Mitts. Schneider, Trouba, Mancini as a throw in


    Why would they open up a hole on RD for a 3C? Lol most of these guys are rentals and will take picks to acquire

    That’s why I said Mitts was a long shot
    29 janv. à 10 h 0
    #11
    Shibbal18
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2016
    Messages: 25,610
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,209
    Quoting: Rags21
    Why would they open up a hole on RD for a 3C? Lol most of these guys are rentals and will take picks to acquire

    That’s why I said Mitts was a long shot


    He's a 2C you could play at 3C, creating significantly better depth and a better 3rd line than with Brodzinski. Plus he's team controlled
    29 janv. à 10 h 3
    #12
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 5,887
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,847
    Quoting: Rags21
    Definitely not for a 3C lol


    That's fine, but what Mitts has done over the last 14 months doesn't come cheap.
    gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
    29 janv. à 10 h 4
    #13
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 6,503
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,597
    Quoting: BUFF36
    Schneider and your 1st Top 10 protected


    You guys desperately need to resign him if he has that value. You’re trying to compete today and tomorrow. Not in 5 years
    BUFF36 a aimé ceci.
    29 janv. à 10 h 5
    #14
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 6,503
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,597
    Quoting: Shibbal18
    He's a 2C you could play at 3C, creating significantly better depth and a better 3rd line than with Brodzinski. Plus he's team controlled


    All the more reason for you guys to keep him. Desperately trying to compete now. BUF isn’t rebuilding for 5 years down the road
    gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
    29 janv. à 10 h 10
    #15
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 5,887
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,847
    Quoting: NYR1983
    You guys desperately need to resign him if he has that value. You’re trying to compete today and tomorrow. Not in 5 years


    I would like to sign him, but we have locked in 2 C already and he's a good trade chip.
    gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
    29 janv. à 10 h 14
    #16
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 6,503
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,597
    Quoting: BUFF36
    I would like to sign him, but we have locked in 2 C already and he's a good trade chip.


    So a team in need of a 2C is the best fit.
    BUFF36 et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
    29 janv. à 10 h 15
    #17
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 5,887
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,847
    Quoting: NYR1983
    So a team in need of a 2C is the best fit.


    Any Team that needsa good Hockey player
    Shibbal18 et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
    29 janv. à 10 h 24
    #18
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 6,503
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,597
    Quoting: BUFF36
    Any Team that needsa good Hockey player


    That’s BUF. But if you can find someone in need of a 2C you’ll get the value you want back
    BUFF36 et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
    29 janv. à 10 h 45
    #19
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2021
    Messages: 6,477
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,779
    Quoting: Shibbal18
    He's a 2C you could play at 3C, creating significantly better depth and a better 3rd line than with Brodzinski. Plus he's team controlled


    My whole list is a bunch of 3C’s who are better than brodzinski and will only take picks to acquire, not roster players

    Plus they don’t need team control because as of right now, chytil is trying to come back next year
    29 janv. à 10 h 45
    #20
    Shibbal18
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2016
    Messages: 25,610
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,209
    Quoting: NYR1983
    That’s BUF. But if you can find someone in need of a 2C you’ll get the value you want back


    Buffalo has a significant amount of talented forwards, which is why Mitts would available
    29 janv. à 10 h 46
    #21
    Shibbal18
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2016
    Messages: 25,610
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,209
    Quoting: Rags21
    My whole list is a bunch of 3C’s who are better than brodzinski and will only take picks to acquire, not roster players

    Plus they don’t need team control because as of right now, chytil is trying to come back next year


    Mitts is better than Chytil. Do you want cheap or do you want good
    29 janv. à 10 h 49
    #22
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2021
    Messages: 6,477
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,779
    Quoting: Shibbal18
    Mitts is better than Chytil. Do you want cheap or do you want good


    Since 2020, chytil has been the better 5v5 center, both on-ice and individual per NST lol

    And that’s besides the point. The point is if chytil comes back, they don’t have cap room for Mitts
    BUFF36 a aimé ceci.
    29 janv. à 11 h 7
    #23
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 6,503
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,597
    Quoting: Shibbal18
    Buffalo has a significant amount of talented forwards, which is why Mitts would available


    Ya BUF has nothing but high end forwards. So good, the reason they are 25th in the league. 💀. Now mitts might be good but he isn’t disposable for BUF. Now if you can find a team in need of a 2C then you will get the value. But this isnt a sellers TDL unfortunately, many 3C types out there for less than a 1st and most teams aren’t entertaining the idea of moving a 1st. Outside of the retaining mitts moving forward it makes no sense for NYR to begin with
    29 janv. à 12 h 4
    #24
    Shibbal18
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2016
    Messages: 25,610
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,209
    Quoting: NYR1983
    Ya BUF has nothing but high end forwards. So good, the reason they are 25th in the league. 💀. Now mitts might be good but he isn’t disposable for BUF. Now if you can find a team in need of a 2C then you will get the value. But this isnt a sellers TDL unfortunately, many 3C types out there for less than a 1st and most teams aren’t entertaining the idea of moving a 1st. Outside of the retaining mitts moving forward it makes no sense for NYR to begin with


    Injuries, no one in the league looks at their forward group and thinks they need more forwards 💀💀no cap rizz
    29 janv. à 12 h 6
    #25
    Shibbal18
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2016
    Messages: 25,610
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,209
    Quoting: Rags21
    Since 2020, chytil has been the better 5v5 center, both on-ice and individual per NST lol

    And that’s besides the point. The point is if chytil comes back, they don’t have cap room for Mitts


    How about since 2022, instead of including the Ralph Krueger era. Chytil also can't stay healthy
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage