SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Calgary fun

Créé par: dougbailey
Équipe: 2023-24 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 28 janv. 2024
Publié: 28 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. Byram, Bowen
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (COL)
COL
  1. Lindholm, Elias (2 425 000 $ retained)
2.
CGY
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (VAN)
VAN
  1. Tanev, Christopher
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (CGY)
3.
CGY
  1. Lysell, Fabian
  2. Poitras, Matthew
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (BOS)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CGY
Logo de COL
Logo de VAN
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
Logo de CGY
2025
Logo de FLA
Logo de BOS
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2026
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2083 500 000 $72 101 666 $0 $1 062 500 $11 398 334 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
855 833 $855 833 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
832 500 $832 500 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
825 000 $825 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flames de Calgary
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD, C
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
28 janv. à 11 h 10
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 84
Mentions "j'aime": 23
none of these trades are even close lol
Bruins1054_gmb et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
28 janv. à 11 h 15
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,816
Mentions "j'aime": 1,181
I think Boston politely sits this one out and takes our chances that Hanifin or Lindholm hits free agency.
28 janv. à 11 h 16
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 314
Mentions "j'aime": 414
Byram holds to much value to Colorado to be seen as a trade piece for a rental. Not to mention that you have Colorado adding here.

Lindholm is interesting to Colorado. Not my preferred choice. But sure, i could se them making a push for him. 2024 first is a start and then add something in the neighborhood of the value of a second.
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
28 janv. à 11 h 23
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 1,210
Mentions "j'aime": 465
That Boston trade is absolutely abhorrent.
28 janv. à 11 h 36
#5
Representing the 505
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,501
Mentions "j'aime": 3,686
Quoting: LaTornade
Byram holds to much value to Colorado to be seen as a trade piece for a rental. Not to mention that you have Colorado adding here.

Lindholm is interesting to Colorado. Not my preferred choice. But sure, i could se them making a push for him. 2024 first is a start and then add something in the neighborhood of the value of a second.


Interesting; most Avs fans see Lindy as THE guy to get. For the record: I don't think they'll pay the price the Flames will want. Who do you like?
LaTornade a aimé ceci.
28 janv. à 11 h 40
#6
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,231
Mentions "j'aime": 7,011
Quoting: Celtics21
I think Boston politely sits this one out and takes our chances that Hanifin or Lindholm hits free agency.


with that offer, I don't think it's polite. If Poitras was taken out, i still think it isn't polite. the boston version of this nonsense would be, "hey want a 3rd for hanifin?"
28 janv. à 12 h 9
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,832
Mentions "j'aime": 8,854
Did not realize Noah was Bobby Orr in his prime. Seeing how he is not…Boston declines.
28 janv. à 13 h 8
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,816
Mentions "j'aime": 1,181
Modifié 28 janv. à 13 h 17
I hate that we start criticizing the players because a fan makes an illogical trade. Hanifin, Lindholm, and the Bruins prospects have value. I think I’ve seen more one sided deals with Hanifin/Lindholm on both sides as any players on this site

You could add Lindholm with full retention on both players from the Flames plus Geekie/Forbort from Boston,and I probably still pass. I’d like say we are going to sign both long term, but not sure that is realistic for long term cap health. Once you consider that, it becomes harder.

Reality is Boston will likely be able to bring in one of these two in FA. I’d be surprised if one, if not both, are available in July. My preference is Hanifin because he’s younger and I think we have a potential top 9 forward in Lysell and would like to give Frederic more play in the top 6.

I do think they have to set aside some of next years money for Frederic, whose value in terms of production / dollar will come closer to Lindholm as their contracts and the players age. It’s one of the reasons where I wouldn’t be shocked if they chose to keep Ullmark through his free agent year and simply let him go
28 janv. à 13 h 54
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 314
Mentions "j'aime": 414
Quoting: NMAvsFan
Interesting; most Avs fans see Lindy as THE guy to get. For the record: I don't think they'll pay the price the Flames will want. Who do you like?


Sure, Lindy probably is THE guy if we’re talking rentals and i agree if we’re talking purely about this season and who is the best fit. But the reality is as you say, the acquisition cost will be very high and we’ll have the exact same problem next year. Except a lot less assets to move to solve it. I’m not a big fan of that.

I would prefer to use the assets on someone who can fill a role next year. The borderline 2/3C-route with a player with pace and upside. Morgan Frost has been looking great lately and i really like the flexibility his cap hit offers next year. Ryan McLeod would otherwise be my dream target (no reason for Edmonton to move on from him but i would sooo overpay for him).

The other option would ne to play Colton at 2C (he looks better and better) and find a 3C to play with Wood and LOC. Doesn’t love this tho since they are the ideal third line togheter.
NMAvsFan et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage