SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Habs Deadline

Créé par: Brady135
Équipe: 2023-24 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 28 janv. 2024
Publié: 28 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3950 000 $
Transactions
1.
MTL
  1. Sýkora, Adam
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (NYR)
NYR
  1. Monahan, Sean
Détails additionnels:
Shaping up to be a competitive market for limited rental centres. Whoever loses out on Lindholm will circle back to Monahan. Monahan is not a bad add for a contender. Veteran centre who is on pace for 60 pts, very good in the dot, responsible defensively, low cap hit. Could probably squeeze a 1st rd pick out of a desperate team, but I feel a 2nd and a B level prospect is fair value.
2.
MTL
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (MTL)
WPG
  1. Savard, David
Détails additionnels:
A lot of D men on the market this year. Not sure if there will be interest in Savard or not. Cheveldayoff historically hasn’t been a huge spender at deadlines, usually adds cheaper value options. I think Winnipeg could use a shutdown right shot D for their bottom pair. Savard is an experienced cup champ who blocks 5+ shots a game, kills penalties, munches minutes. Also signed for an extra year adds some insurance if Winnipeg loses Demelo in the offseason. Would be willing to take a cap dump back if needed, but Jets aren’t in LTIR, so Savard’s contract is worth around 740k prorated for the rest of the year.
3.
MTL
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (EDM)
EDM
  1. Allen, Jake (1 925 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
A goalie needy team will circle back to Montreal by the deadline. Can see Edmonton adding Allen as insurance for Skinner. They have been riding Skinner pretty heavy lately, Allen could come in and take some of the load so Skinner isn’t burnt out come playoff time. Don’t think Allen is worth much more than a 3rd with retention. Also with Allen signed next year for under 2m, Edmonton can buyout Campbell and focus that money elsewhere next year.
4.
MTL
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2025 (LAK)
LAK
  1. Pearson, Tanner
Détails additionnels:
Not necessarily LA, not even sure if anyone would be even interested in Pearson. He’s not worth much, could be a veteran 13th forward on a contender. Injury insurance down the road. For a team not in LTIR, Pearson’s cap hit is worth around 740k prorated. I would like to see him moved out to create a roster spot for a young player like Josh Roy to play with big club for the rest of the year.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de MTL
Logo de COL
Logo de NYR
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MIN
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de SJS
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de EDM
Logo de WSH
2025
Logo de MTL
Logo de CGY
Logo de MTL
Logo de PIT
Logo de MTL
Logo de VAN
Logo de EDM
Logo de MTL
Logo de DET
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de LAK
Logo de MTL
2026
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $70 785 416 $1 170 000 $4 035 000 $12 714 584 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 8
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
835 000 $835 000 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
775 000 $775 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance420 000 $$420K)
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
867 500 $867 500 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
766 667 $766 667 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
890 000 $890 000 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
828 333 $828 333 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
812 500 $812 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 362 500 $3 362 500 $
C, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
775 000 $775 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
762 500 $762 500 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
28 janv. à 10 h 53
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 5,406
Mentions "j'aime": 2,376
Why do you guys want Sykora? Lol don’t y’all have a lot of prospects in your pipeline
28 janv. à 11 h 14
#2
Benzino204
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,661
Mentions "j'aime": 700
Savard has a bad contract, with another year on it, and the Jets don't have the cap space.
CanMerc et Windjammer a aimé ceci.
28 janv. à 11 h 20
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 1,069
Mentions "j'aime": 466
Quoting: Benzino204
Savard has a bad contract, with another year on it, and the Jets don't have the cap space.


Savard is not a bad contract for 3.5M for 1 more year. He’s a #4. It’s a fair contract for what he brings.
Brady135 a aimé ceci.
28 janv. à 11 h 21
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 46
Mentions "j'aime": 6
Quoting: Rags21
Why do you guys want Sykora? Lol don’t y’all have a lot of prospects in your pipeline


Can never have enough! Sykora reminds me of Arturri Lehkonen, I’d be interested in giving him a shot. I like Hughes strategy of acquiring prospects over draft picks.
28 janv. à 11 h 24
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 5,406
Mentions "j'aime": 2,376
Quoting: Brady135
Can never have enough! Sykora reminds me of Arturri Lehkonen, I’d be interested in giving him a shot. I like Hughes strategy of acquiring prospects over draft picks.


Rangers will probably hold on to Othmann, Berard, Sykora, Perreault, Fortescue. Anyone else is pretty much on the table
28 janv. à 11 h 24
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2023
Messages: 543
Mentions "j'aime": 428
Jets Decline
Windjammer a aimé ceci.
28 janv. à 11 h 26
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 46
Mentions "j'aime": 6
Quoting: Benzino204
Savard has a bad contract, with another year on it, and the Jets don't have the cap space.


Prorated this year, Savard fits under the Jets cap. Next year the cap is going up over 4 million. He easily fits. If we don’t retain on Jake Allen, I would retain on Savard to get this deal done. Also said I would take back a cap dump like Stanley to help money wise if need be.
28 janv. à 11 h 28
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 16,132
Mentions "j'aime": 7,189
Modifié 28 janv. à 11 h 44
Savard has a bad contract for a bottom pairing guy, and he's not worth a high 2nd.

No interest from Winnipeg, they can't afford to get stuck with Savard's contract next year.
28 janv. à 11 h 31
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 46
Mentions "j'aime": 6
Quoting: Rags21
Rangers will probably hold on to Othmann, Berard, Sykora, Perreault, Fortescue. Anyone else is pretty much on the table


I’m not asking for Perreault or Othmann. I don’t think Monahan is worth a team’s best prospect. But if you’re not willing to add a b level prospect like Sykora, then a straight up 1st will be the value.
28 janv. à 11 h 42
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 46
Mentions "j'aime": 6
Quoting: Windjammer
Savard has a bad ontract for a bottom pairing guy, and he's not worth a high 2nd.

No interest from Winnipeg, they can't afford to get stuck with Savard's contract next year.


Ahh the famous Windjammer! I knew you would come! Seeing how your Jets are having a good year in the tough central division, who do you have them adding at the deadline to keep pace with Colorado and Dallas?
28 janv. à 11 h 48
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 16,132
Mentions "j'aime": 7,189
Quoting: Brady135
Ahh the famous Windjammer! I knew you would come! Seeing how your Jets are having a good year in the tough central division, who do you have them adding at the deadline to keep pace with Colorado and Dallas?


It's hard to say. Chevy is pretty good at finding guys that no one knew were available. He most likely adds a guy that is off everyone's radar.

The Jets have other players to extend, so they can't afford to get stuck with Savard next year.
28 janv. à 11 h 53
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 5,406
Mentions "j'aime": 2,376
Quoting: Brady135
I’m not asking for Perreault or Othmann. I don’t think Monahan is worth a team’s best prospect. But if you’re not willing to add a b level prospect like Sykora, then a straight up 1st will be the value.


I mean that’s fine lol Sykora is closer to NHL ready than the 2024 1st. But any Monahan trade should come with injury insurance like a 3rd coming back to NYR if he doesn’t meet requirements
28 janv. à 12 h 31
#13
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,899
Mentions "j'aime": 25,715
Your gut feeling is absolutely right: most certainly not Los Angeles. But your analysis regarding Pearson is very well put.
28 janv. à 12 h 44
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 46
Mentions "j'aime": 6
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Your gut feeling is absolutely right: most certainly not Los Angeles. But your analysis regarding Pearson is very well put.


Had LA as that’s where Tanner won a cup in the past. Thank you for actually reading and not just reacting like 90% of the fans on here!
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
28 janv. à 12 h 49
#15
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 46
Mentions "j'aime": 6
Quoting: Rags21
I mean that’s fine lol Sykora is closer to NHL ready than the 2024 1st. But any Monahan trade should come with injury insurance like a 3rd coming back to NYR if he doesn’t meet requirements


It’s not like Monahan is on a 5 year deal. He’s a deadline rental. That’s the chance you take lol I’ve never seen a deadline deal have a condition like that. I think the lack of available centres on the market will out weigh Monahan’s injury past.
28 janv. à 12 h 54
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 5,406
Mentions "j'aime": 2,376
Quoting: Brady135
It’s not like Monahan is on a 5 year deal. He’s a deadline rental. That’s the chance you take lol I’ve never seen a deadline deal have a condition like that. I think the lack of available centres on the market will out weigh Monahan’s injury past.


There’s plenty of conditions that teams use. Drury has traded conditional 2nds in back to back years so that’s what he’ll likely do again
28 janv. à 13 h 1
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 1,069
Mentions "j'aime": 466
Quoting: Benzino204
Savard has a bad contract, with another year on it, and the Jets don't have the cap space.


There are only 3 defensemen in whole league who are on a UFA contract who play more than Savard (TOI per game)
He’s 3rd in whole league in blocks per 60.

I’m not saying he will get a 1st round pick or that he’s this amazing player. But his contract is not bad for what he brings.

I could see a team sending a 2nd round pick for him. Would likely be a pick around 45-60. Acquiring team gets 2 playoff runs.
28 janv. à 13 h 44
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 16,132
Mentions "j'aime": 7,189
Quoting: Lochness1202
There are only 3 defensemen in whole league who are on a UFA contract who play more than Savard (TOI per game)
He’s 3rd in whole league in blocks per 60.

I’m not saying he will get a 1st round pick or that he’s this amazing player. But his contract is not bad for what he brings.

I could see a team sending a 2nd round pick for him. Would likely be a pick around 45-60. Acquiring team gets 2 playoff runs.


Savard isn't an upcoming UFA that's what hurts his value. You're saddled with his contact for another year if you add him.
28 janv. à 19 h 46
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 1,069
Mentions "j'aime": 466
Quoting: Windjammer
Savard isn't an upcoming UFA that's what hurts his value. You're saddled with his contact for another year if you add him.

Yea but it’s term on a good contract. That’s good lol
Term is only bad when it’s on a bad contract.
28 janv. à 19 h 51
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 16,132
Mentions "j'aime": 7,189
Quoting: Lochness1202
Yea but it’s term on a good contract. That’s good lol
Term is only bad when it’s on a bad contract.


Right, but in this case we are talking about a bad contract. $3.5 mil on an average 5/6 D, is a bad contract.
28 janv. à 19 h 55
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 1,069
Mentions "j'aime": 466
Quoting: Windjammer
Right, but in this case we are talking about a bad contract. $3.5 mil on an average 5/6 D, is a bad contract.

Savard is not a 5-6. He’s a 4.

3rd most in blocks per 60. Logs a ton of ice time.
Kills penalties. Has won before.

3.5M for that is not bad. It’s not a bargain but it certainly not bad. Who could you sign in the summer for 3.5M on a 1 year deal that’s better than that
28 janv. à 20 h 2
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 16,132
Mentions "j'aime": 7,189
Quoting: Lochness1202
Savard is not a 5-6. He’s a 4.

3rd most in blocks per 60. Logs a ton of ice time.
Kills penalties. Has won before.

3.5M for that is not bad. It’s not a bargain but it certainly not bad. Who could you sign in the summer for 3.5M on a 1 year deal that’s better than that


He might be a 4 on a bad team, but not on a playoff team.

He isn't an upgrade on Morrissey, DeMelo, Dillon, Pionk, Samberg or Schmidt.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage