Éditer l'avatar
  • png, jpeg
  • La grandeur minimale recommandée se veut de 800px par 800px
  • Grandeur maximale: 1MB
Glisser l'image pour repositionner
Sauvegarder
Annuler

Lochness1202

Membre depuis
2 nov 2019
Équipe favorite
Canadiens de Montréal
Messages dans les forums
79
Messages par jour
0.12
Sujets de discussion
2
Forum: Armchair-GM18 jui à 16 h 25
Sujet: MB will lose this bet
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ste_Catherine_Street</b></div><div>Don't be a mad troll. I've been a fan of price ever since he played his first game, have defended him from the naysayers ever since people were mad we kept halak, and have been rubbing it in people's faces with his play this years playoffs.
Don't be a sarcastic/delusional troll on here when people disagree with you</div></div>

Ive been a huge fan of price too. I’ve defended him same as you, but this is not about price. It’s about you pretending to know for sure that Seattle will take him when you have no clue. You’re so blind to this that you can’t even see the positives of Seattle taking him. 100k jerseys by opening night?!?! Get real dude, there’s 700k people in Seattle… you really think 1 in 7 are getting a price jersey. You have no clue what you are talking about and I don’t know either if Seattle will take him or not. I have no clue, although I do think that they won’t , but you’re just being a big drama Queen. Just sit back and relax dude, you’re the typical Habs fan that freaks out over everything . No wonder players don’t want to play here, it’s because of fans like you that freak out when a player doesn’t score in 3 games and demands trades every 3rd game. Have some composure and get a hold of yourself. You are embarrassing and poorly representing our fan base
Forum: Armchair-GM 8 jui à 22 h 28
Sujet: dubois
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DiehardRedWingsFan58</b></div><div>Dude to us Paul Byron making 3.4 mil for 2 more years is a cap dump. Yzerman wont give up picks unless it's for younger long term assets even a 6th is a no go.</div></div>

Yea I know Detroit is not giving anything for Byron. I get that , but what I’m saying is habs are not adding to him to get rid of him.

I would much rather the habs just keep him, because, as I said, his contract is not that bad and it’s not like he is useless. I would much rather hold onto to him for another year, and then see about maybe trading him when we need to resign Suzuki next summer. Next year it will only be 1 year left at 3.4 which is much more manageable and would not cost us as much if we absolutely needed to get rid of him them. But I’m not interested in paying another team to take him now especially when he is not useless. His true value is probably around 2M so we would need to find a 2M player and the savings would only be 1.4M. Next year, different story
Forum: Armchair-GM27 jun à 6 h 59
Sujet: Big 5
Way too much for chychrun.
And why are people so obsessed with trying to get rid of Byron.?? I think he’d be an appealing piece for Seattle without the picks.

Scores massive game winning goals for the habs in the playoffs. Has a game winning assist in overtime. He can play up and down the lineup. He’s a leader. His contract really isn’t as terrible as people think. It’s 3.4M for 2 more years. Seattle isn’t projected to be a cap team for the first 1-2 years. They could easily take Byron and flip him at either of the next 2 deadlines and could even retain 1-2M to make him a super interesting depth piece for a contenting team. He’s a playoff performer, a leader in the locker room…I’d be happy if he stayed on the habs too, although I wouldn’t protect.

I’d much rather get Seattle to take Drouin for those picks as oppose to Byron
Forum: Armchair-GM23 jun à 21 h 07
Sujet: Next year
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Lochness1202</b></div><div>I think just one 2nd is enough to entice seattle to take Drouin. I wouldn’t include both. He still a serviceable player and at 5M his contract is not that bad. If they don’t want to take the one 2nd round pick, let them pick whoever they want. None of Chiarot, Edmundson, Allen are worth Drouin and two 2nds in my opinion. For one pick I would do it, but not 2. I’d play super hard ball with Seattle. At the end of th day, they can get a 2nd and Drouin which is not bad pickup. I know the goal for them almost seems like it’s to “screw over” every team like Vegas did, but at the end of the day they have to do what is right for them too. I would think passing on a 2nd + Drouin (who can still be a 50 point guy) just to piss us off by taking Chiarot/Edmundson or Allen is foolish.

I don’t love the RNH signing. I don’t see what he would bring. I’d much rather sign a LW like SAAD for 2M less than what you offered RNH here.</div></div>

Forgot to add, didn’t see that you did NOT resign Danault. I would just give 4-5M of RNH money to Danault and then still be left with 2-3M. I’d much rather have Danault down then middle and an extra 2-3M than RNH playing on the wing.
Forum: Armchair-GM23 jun à 21 h 05
Sujet: Next year
I think just one 2nd is enough to entice seattle to take Drouin. I wouldn’t include both. He still a serviceable player and at 5M his contract is not that bad. If they don’t want to take the one 2nd round pick, let them pick whoever they want. None of Chiarot, Edmundson, Allen are worth Drouin and two 2nds in my opinion. For one pick I would do it, but not 2. I’d play super hard ball with Seattle. At the end of th day, they can get a 2nd and Drouin which is not bad pickup. I know the goal for them almost seems like it’s to “screw over” every team like Vegas did, but at the end of the day they have to do what is right for them too. I would think passing on a 2nd + Drouin (who can still be a 50 point guy) just to piss us off by taking Chiarot/Edmundson or Allen is foolish.

I don’t love the RNH signing. I don’t see what he would bring. I’d much rather sign a LW like SAAD for 2M less than what you offered RNH here.
Forum: Armchair-GM 7 jun à 19 h 24
Sujet: LOS Angeles is that a fair trade
Both are awful. Why are you trying so hard to get rid of Byron?! His contract is not thaaaat bad. 2 years left after 3.4M. There are far worse contracts and it’s not like Byron contributes nothing like Eriksson for example. Byron is still a player so to add a 2 picks and Allen is just ludicrous. I’m seriously interested to know what you will do with that extra 3.4M million??? Are you drastically going to improve the team enough with 3.4M to merit giving 2 picks. And keep in mind, Byron is probably worth 1.5M-2M so really you are only clearing and additional 2M of value….it’s completely ridiculous to want to trade all that just to get rid of Byron. A complete lack of logic in my opinion.

As for the second one, I don’t see what it accomplishes. Just a random trade
Forum: Armchair-GM 5 jun à 20 h 58
Sujet: Youre welcome
LA King trade: no way. Byron is still useful and trading him with picks like that is trying too hard to get rid of him. Yea maybe he’s overpaid by 1M but it’s not the end of the world. That’s completely crazy to trade him with those picks. We don’t need Kempe and Lemieux.

The Winnipeg trade i really don’t understand the logic. Chiarot hs been great and that return is nothing. I understand if you want to trade him because his value is high, but that’s not the return I’d be seeking in the scenario.

The Dahlin OS interesting... he’s obviously not worth 10.5M but he very well could be in a few years. In a new environment, he could thrive and so Buffalo would have a tough decision to make in terms of paying up now and keep getting what they have been getting in Dahlin or to move on. I think they would match. It would be a tough sell to the fans after building him up for so long
Forum: Armchair-GM 5 jun à 20 h 49
Sujet: Mattias Norlinder - Detailed 2021 Offseason
I don’t hate it. Although I wouldn’t sign Bernier - certainly not at 3M. Also, I think I’ll pass on Nate Thompson. I think we can fill that roll within.

As for protection list, it’ll be super interesting to see who we protect because there will be quality players available. I wouldn’t try to make a deal with Seattle. Just let them take whoever and be done with it.

As for my protection list:
F: Gallagher, KK, Toffoli, Anderson, Danault, Lehkonen, Drouin
(Id expose Evans because I don’t see Seattle taking him. I think they might look at concussion history and not want to gamble and there should be enough players like him around the league to pick. It’s a gamble, but I don’t see them taking Evans especially with who might be available on D and G from us. I’d be hesitant to expose Lehkonen or Drouin as they are a bit more established. I really hope they don’t take Evans though, he has been super impressive this year and he might still be under the radar)
D: Weber, Petry, Chiarot
(I’d expose Edmundson. Really tough decision between him and Ben. Would love to keep them both, and think we will based on who Seattle picks)
G: Allen (this is who I think Seattle takes, although there are a lot of goalie free agents this year so who knows)

Basically, I think it comes down Edmundson, Chiarot or Allen.