SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

23-24 Leafs

Créé par: kous
Équipe: 2023-24 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 27 janv. 2024
Publié: 27 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
MTL
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (TOR)
2.
TOR
  1. Lyubushkin, Ilya (1 375 000 $ retained)
ANA
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de NYI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2026
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $81 191 450 $0 $15 000 $2 308 550 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 985 000 $1 985 000 $ (Bonis de performance15 000 $$15K)
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
796 667 $796 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
766 667 $766 667 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 550 000 $3 550 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
-687 500 $-687 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 janv. à 17 h 56
#26
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 741
Mentions "j'aime": 297
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
Yeah, saying 'watch the games' sounds really dumb as an argument, doesnt it?


Its hard to have an educated conversation with you lol. Its similar to talking to my nine year old lol. I'll reach back out after the deadline bud after its settled
27 janv. à 18 h 19
#27
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,725
Mentions "j'aime": 7,381
Quoting: Commonsense27
Its hard to have an educated conversation with you lol. Its similar to talking to my nine year old lol. I'll reach back out after the deadline bud after its settled


dude, you keep saying things like this but clearly have no idea about hockey at all. Like if you had any idea how to read basic stats, let alone advanced ones or have the ability to analyze hockey past a don cherry rock em sock em video then you'd know that Monahan is a power play merchant. You keep insisting he's good defensively but obviously to anyone with eyes, have no idea what that means
SomeonesOffended a aimé ceci.
27 janv. à 18 h 35
#28
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 741
Mentions "j'aime": 297
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
dude, you keep saying things like this but clearly have no idea about hockey at all. Like if you had any idea how to read basic stats, let alone advanced ones or have the ability to analyze hockey past a don cherry rock em sock em video then you'd know that Monahan is a power play merchant. You keep insisting he's good defensively but obviously to anyone with eyes, have no idea what that means


You have a problem bud lol. We'll talk after the deadline lol
27 janv. à 18 h 40
#29
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,725
Mentions "j'aime": 7,381
Quoting: Commonsense27
You have a problem bud lol. We'll talk after the deadline lol


lol, yeah we will and im sure you'll have an excuse just like all the habs fans last year when savard and Price didnt get moved and edmundson got a 3rd and a 7th with retention.
But hey, some dumb gm over paid for chariot and that convinced you and so many others that your trash was all worth 1sts
SomeonesOffended a aimé ceci.
27 janv. à 18 h 46
#30
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 741
Mentions "j'aime": 297
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
lol, yeah we will and im sure you'll have an excuse just like all the habs fans last year when savard and Price didnt get moved and edmundson got a 3rd and a 7th with retention.
But hey, some dumb gm over paid for chariot and that convinced you and so many others that your trash was all worth 1sts


Don't generalize me bud. Be an edcuated debater and listen/read the points the person you're talking to and debate on that. I never said anything about Savard, Price or Edmunston. I did mention Chiarot howver, everyone thought I was crazy when I said someone would over pay and send a first for Chiarot. You just hate the habs so much that it clouds your judgement.
27 janv. à 18 h 52
#31
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,725
Mentions "j'aime": 7,381
Quoting: Commonsense27
Don't generalize me bud. Be an edcuated debater and listen/read the points the person you're talking to and debate on that. I never said anything about Savard, Price or Edmunston. I did mention Chiarot howver, everyone thought I was crazy when I said someone would over pay and send a first for Chiarot. You just hate the habs so much that it clouds your judgement.


/spends all day generalizing everyone else
"dont generalize me bud!"
You wouldnt know educated debate if it kicked you in the neck, you've stated nothing but your opinion and basically said nothing but "i know better than you because i watch habs games" in response. You have given zero information as to why you think Monahan is good past the fact that you think he is good.
I also love how you end it with you doing exactly what you accuse me of doing. Tell ya what, give me one stat that shows monahan is good, or even passable defensivly. And please use faceoffs again, because that might be the dumbest example of a fake defensive stat that isnt +/-
27 janv. à 19 h 8
#32
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 741
Mentions "j'aime": 297
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
/spends all day generalizing everyone else
"dont generalize me bud!"
You wouldnt know educated debate if it kicked you in the neck, you've stated nothing but your opinion and basically said nothing but "i know better than you because i watch habs games" in response. You have given zero information as to why you think Monahan is good past the fact that you think he is good.
I also love how you end it with you doing exactly what you accuse me of doing. Tell ya what, give me one stat that shows monahan is good, or even passable defensivly. And please use faceoffs again, because that might be the dumbest example of a fake defensive stat that isnt +/-


The only thing you've said is "he is bad defensively" and you're talkiing about I've mentioned nothing? Lol. How stupid are you? I can't believe I have to repeat myself but, the reasons he is worth a first are 1- His cap hit will be a little over $900,000 with 50% retained. 2- On pace for 60pts on a team that doesn't score. He would be a point per game player playing on the leafs! 3- Versatile, could move up and down your lineup. Good enough to be a top line winger or could be a higher end third line center. 4- He plays both PP and PK and is good at both 5-One of the best faceoff guys in the league which is highly valuable in the playoffs 6- Everyone loves him in the dressing room. Former Captain and pretty good leader. 7- His defensive metrics in his own zone are decent.

HE IS GETTING AT LEAST A FIRST ROUND PICK AT THE DEADLINE lol
27 janv. à 19 h 13
#33
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,725
Mentions "j'aime": 7,381
Quoting: Commonsense27
The only thing you've said is "he is bad defensively" and you're talkiing about I've mentioned nothing? Lol. How stupid are you? I can't believe I have to repeat myself but, the reasons he is worth a first are 1- His cap hit will be a little over $900,000 with 50% retained. 2- On pace for 60pts on a team that doesn't score. He would be a point per game player playing on the leafs! 3- Versatile, could move up and down your lineup. Good enough to be a top line winger or could be a higher end third line center. 4- He plays both PP and PK and is good at both 5-One of the best faceoff guys in the league which is highly valuable in the playoffs 6- Everyone loves him in the dressing room. Former Captain and pretty good leader. 7- His defensive metrics in his own zone are decent.

HE IS GETTING AT LEAST A FIRST ROUND PICK AT THE DEADLINE lol


lol, so "because I said so" not a single stat or anything that I asked about to show that he is good defensively.
27 janv. à 19 h 18
#34
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 741
Mentions "j'aime": 297
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
lol, so "because I said so" not a single stat or anything that I asked about to show that he is good defensively.


Ya, I'm done with you. I think I lost a few IQ points talking to you lol. I know you'll reply with another dumb take and you seem like a guy who couldn't handle not getting the last word in, so I'll stop engaging with you until after the deadline
27 janv. à 19 h 20
#35
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,725
Mentions "j'aime": 7,381
Quoting: Commonsense27
Ya, I'm done with you. I think I lost a few IQ points talking to you lol. I know you'll reply with another dumb take and you seem like a guy who couldn't handle not getting the last word in, so I'll stop engaging with you until after the deadline


so you cant come up with a single stat to prove your point. Got it, good job good effort.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage