SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Trade Machine Proposals

Sorry Canucks fans Its happening

Créé par: Dom1422
Publié: 23 janv. à 13 h 40
Plafond salarial: 83 500 000 $
Journées à la saison: 86/192 (45%)
Détermination du registraire central: Cette transaction a été refusée, car une des équipes excède le plafond salarial

Logo de Canadiens de MontréalCanadiens de Montréal

DépartStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Monahan, SeanCanadiens de MontréalLNH50%992 500 $011---46112031--
ArrivéeStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Kravtsov, VitaliCanucks de VancouverListe de réserve-0 $001---------
Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (Logo de Canucks de VancouverVAN)---100------
VariationEspace sous le plafond salarialFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Initial4 497 500 $2246734916
Variation992 500 $-1-10100
Final5 490 000 $ (↑)21 (↓)45 (↓)735 (↑)916-11-20-31

Logo de Canucks de VancouverCanucks de Vancouver

DépartStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Kravtsov, VitaliCanucks de VancouverListe de réserve-0 $001---------
Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (Logo de Canucks de VancouverVAN)---100------
ArrivéeStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Monahan, SeanCanadiens de MontréalLNH50%992 500 $011---46112031--
VariationEspace sous le plafond salarialFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Initial332 500 $2346683312
Variation-992 500 $110-100
Final-660 000 $ (↓)24 (↑)47 (↑)682 (↓)312112031
23 janv. à 14 h 4
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2023
Messages: 872
Mentions "j'aime": 288
looks acceptable
BruceBanner a aimé ceci.
23 janv. à 14 h 46
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 497
Mentions "j'aime": 122
Quoting: my_name_is_Fil
looks acceptable


Agreed.
23 janv. à 14 h 49
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 497
Mentions "j'aime": 122
Quoting: BruceBanner
Agreed.


Wait. With retention Canucks need to send a better prospect instead.
Josh Bloom?
Or another pick, 2025 5th rnd
23 janv. à 15 h 15
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,176
Mentions "j'aime": 9,404
I’d offer a 2nd and a prospect like Klimovich/McDonough max. If we’re trading a 1st it should be as part of a package for a high end rental (like Guentzel) or a player with term (like Buchnevich or JEE)
23 janv. à 15 h 32
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2023
Messages: 872
Mentions "j'aime": 288
Quoting: mv21227
I’d offer a 2nd and a prospect like Klimovich/McDonough max. If we’re trading a 1st it should be as part of a package for a high end rental (like Guentzel) or a player with term (like Buchnevich or JEE)


high end rental?

like.. more than a top 6 center who is great at draws at almost no cap hit?
23 janv. à 16 h 43
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 1,311
Mentions "j'aime": 285
Quoting: mv21227
I’d offer a 2nd and a prospect like Klimovich/McDonough max. If we’re trading a 1st it should be as part of a package for a high end rental (like Guentzel) or a player with term (like Buchnevich or JEE)


Guentzel will probably cost you next years first as well..
23 janv. à 17 h 12
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,176
Mentions "j'aime": 9,404
Quoting: Dom1422
Guentzel will probably cost you next years first as well..


I think a 1st and a combination of 2 of Podkolzin, Kuzmenko, Hoglander, Raty, Brzustewicz, and a 2nd could get it done. Maybe add in one other piece on top
EatMyScoobySnack a aimé ceci.
23 janv. à 17 h 25
#8
829411
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 237
Mentions "j'aime": 51
No, I would only do it if it’s a 2nd, not a 1st. Just my opinion.
23 janv. à 17 h 51
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 1,311
Mentions "j'aime": 285
Quoting: Canucks4life
No, I would only do it if it’s a 2nd, not a 1st. Just my opinion.


Won’t get him for that. He’s the 2nd best centre on the market. There will probably be 10 teams trying to get him, crating a bidding war. We’re definitely getting a 1st, wouldn’t be surprised if we end up getting a little more than that.
23 janv. à 18 h 38
#10
829411
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 237
Mentions "j'aime": 51
You can get a first, I just wouldn’t do it. Just my thoughts and based off previous trade deadlines. That’s all.
23 janv. à 19 h 0
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 1,311
Mentions "j'aime": 285
Quoting: Canucks4life
You can get a first, I just wouldn’t do it. Just my thoughts and based off previous trade deadlines. That’s all.


Based on previous deadlines he definitely gets a 1st. Players like him always do. Seravelli had an article yesterday about it showing you the other similar players who went for a 1st plus. I get you wouldn’t do it, but your GM would.
23 janv. à 19 h 32
#12
Canucks sorta homer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 1,888
Mentions "j'aime": 867
Canucks decline. Paying way to much for who would essentially be our 3rd line center (thirst line and lotto line being the top 6)
23 janv. à 19 h 43
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 1,311
Mentions "j'aime": 285
Quoting: Hitagi_Senpai
Canucks decline. Paying way to much for who would essentially be our 3rd line center (thirst line and lotto line being the top 6)


I don’t think your GM will agree.
23 janv. à 19 h 54
#14
Canucks sorta homer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 1,888
Mentions "j'aime": 867
Quoting: Dom1422
I don’t think your GM will agree.


He's not getting that much return from Vancouver. There is far more better options. He's not a second line center for us. He'd be a good 3rd liner.
23 janv. à 21 h 4
#15
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 1,311
Mentions "j'aime": 285
Quoting: Hitagi_Senpai
He's not getting that much return from Vancouver. There is far more better options. He's not a second line center for us. He'd be a good 3rd liner.


There actually isn’t better options. The only better option is Lindholm and Monahan actually has more points than him with way (and I mean way) worse linemates. Lindholm will go for more because of his predigree, but those are really the only 2 quality centres available unless im forgetting someone.
23 janv. à 22 h 54
#16
Canucks sorta homer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 1,888
Mentions "j'aime": 867
Quoting: Dom1422
There actually isn’t better options. The only better option is Lindholm and Monahan actually has more points than him with way (and I mean way) worse linemates. Lindholm will go for more because of his predigree, but those are really the only 2 quality centres available unless im forgetting someone.


Lindholm is better regardless. The Flames system is not about scoring goals. 9 out of 10 people take Lindholm, the 10th person is a Habs fan thinking Mony is the second coming.
24 janv. à 4 h 14
#17
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 1,311
Mentions "j'aime": 285
Modifié 24 janv. à 5 h 39
Quoting: Hitagi_Senpai
Lindholm is better regardless. The Flames system is not about scoring goals. 9 out of 10 people take Lindholm, the 10th person is a Habs fan thinking Mony is the second coming.


“The only better option is Lindholm”

Like I said, there aren’t many options. There will be probably 10 teams in a bidding war for Monahan once someone lands Lindholm.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage