SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Canucks go with a versatile center

Créé par: Grizz
Équipe: 2023-24 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 19 janv. 2024
Publié: 19 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
VAN
  1. Monahan, Sean (992 500 $ retained)
MTL
  1. McDonough, Aidan
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (VAN)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de NJD
Logo de VAN
Logo de SJS
Logo de VAN
2025
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2026
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $83 247 917 $850 000 $15 000 $252 083 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C, AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
992 500 $992 500 $ (Bonis de performance15 000 $$15K)
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
775 000 $775 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
775 000 $775 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
883 750 $883 750 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
19 janv. à 2 h 43
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 11,461
Mentions "j'aime": 10,243
Fair price but Monahan isn’t really an upgrade over Suter. He’s good at faceoffs and on the PP, but he’s bad at 5v5. Would rather target Novak/Henrique
AK50 a aimé ceci.
19 janv. à 2 h 47
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 3,889
Mentions "j'aime": 1,236
Quoting: mv21227
Fair price but Monahan isn’t really an upgrade over Suter. He’s good at faceoffs and on the PP, but he’s bad at 5v5. Would rather target Novak/Henrique


Would it make sense if Monahan is put on the fourth line and Alan gets healthy scratched?
I’m saying it as an assumption.
But I think getting Novak would make sense for Vancouver, since his contract is cheap and he plays centre.
19 janv. à 2 h 51
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 63
Mentions "j'aime": 12
Could see Henrique being available and he’s an option but a roster player would have to go out to fit him under the cap. Monahan at his cap with or without retention adds to the depth meaning Suter can be more effective in better marchups paired with Hoglander and Laff on the 4th line Can’t see Novak being available. He is young and valued by Nashville. Eriksson Ek is a pipe dream. Too valuable for Minnesota who are already thin at C. Middeltstadt young and valuable to Buffalo. Lindholm is a nice option but again roster player would have to be moved out and it would likely cost a 1st (Canucks willing) and a top prospect (Canucks unwilling). A sign an trade might entice them to do it but they would need Petey signed first to work out how much they have to work with cap wise.
19 janv. à 2 h 55
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 63
Mentions "j'aime": 12
Quoting: Vancity2196
Would it make sense if Monahan is put on the fourth line and Alan gets healthy scratched?
I’m saying it as an assumption.
But I think getting Novak would make sense for Vancouver, since his contract is cheap and he plays centre.


I just don’t see why Nashville would trade a young 2C entering his prime unless they have some indication from him that he won’t sign there.
19 janv. à 3 h 36
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 3,889
Mentions "j'aime": 1,236
Quoting: Grizz
I just don’t see why Nashville would trade a young 2C entering his prime unless they have some indication from him that he won’t sign there.


If Nashville doesn’t make it to the playoffs then they could trade him to Vancouver, for example.
But Vancouver would use him as a rental not a keeper.
19 janv. à 3 h 41
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 63
Mentions "j'aime": 12
Quoting: Vancity2196
If Nashville doesn’t make it to the playoffs then they could trade him to Vancouver, for example.
But Vancouver would use him as a rental not a keeper.


If he somehow becomes available he is exactly the kind of player Canucks would try to sign to an extension given his age and profile.
Vancity2196 a aimé ceci.
19 janv. à 3 h 42
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 63
Mentions "j'aime": 12
Quoting: mv21227
Fair price but Monahan isn’t really an upgrade over Suter. He’s good at faceoffs and on the PP, but he’s bad at 5v5. Would rather target Novak/Henrique


Another thing to note is that Monahan has largely been deployed in the defensive zone against quality completion suppressing his 5v5 scoring. Still his 5v5 scoring is decent and double what Suter’s is.
JF81 a aimé ceci.
19 janv. à 4 h 59
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 11,461
Mentions "j'aime": 10,243
Quoting: Grizz
Another thing to note is that Monahan has largely been deployed in the defensive zone against quality completion suppressing his 5v5 scoring. Still his 5v5 scoring is decent and double what Suter’s is.


At 5v5
Suter: 1.03 G/60, 1.29 primary P/60, 56.42 CF%, 53.57 xGF%, 2.65 xGF/60, 2.29 xGA/60

Monahan: 0.82 G/60, 1.56 primary P/60, 44.6 CF%, 43.05 xGF%, 2.58 xGF/60, 3.41 xGA/60

Monahan has been slightly more productive offensively, but Suter has been much better defensively and has much better underlying metrics
19 janv. à 5 h 3
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 63
Mentions "j'aime": 12
Quoting: mv21227
At 5v5
Suter: 1.03 G/60, 1.29 primary P/60, 56.42 CF%, 53.57 xGF%, 2.65 xGF/60, 2.29 xGA/60

Monahan: 0.82 G/60, 1.56 primary P/60, 44.6 CF%, 43.05 xGF%, 2.58 xGF/60, 3.41 xGA/60

Monahan has been slightly more productive offensively, but Suter has been much better defensively and has much better underlying metrics


Making Suter ideal further down the depth chart where he can be deployed defensively in a match up line or offensively against a softer line. Or put Monahan with Hoglander and Kuz and have them play limited sheltered offensive minutes against weak lines
19 janv. à 5 h 59
#10
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,942
Mentions "j'aime": 6,649
No 1st = no Monahan, there are over 5 teams reportedly looking to acquire Monahan right now. He is in high demand, therefore the price will be a 1st minimum
Caufield a aimé ceci.
19 janv. à 6 h 1
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 63
Mentions "j'aime": 12
Quoting: Campabee
No 1st = no Monahan, there are over 5 teams reportedly looking to acquire Monahan right now. He is in high demand, therefore the price will be a 1st minimum


That’s fine too. It’s a late 1st.
19 janv. à 6 h 6
#12
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,942
Mentions "j'aime": 6,649
Quoting: Grizz
That’s fine too. It’s a late 1st.


I know, most contenders are late 1sts, that's why I don't understand all the whining from fans saying he isn't worth it lol
19 janv. à 7 h 11
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 35
Mentions "j'aime": 8
Quoting: mv21227
Fair price but Monahan isn’t really an upgrade over Suter. He’s good at faceoffs and on the PP, but he’s bad at 5v5. Would rather target Novak/Henrique


Monahan has more points with a bad team and his offensive zone start are 38 % and Suter nearly 51% ... So yes Monahan he's way more complete center than Suter but he doesn't have the same supporting cast with him... Even Kuzmenko will produce with Monahan...

Novak is young but unsteady. Henrique has a huge cap hit.
Grizz et CBA a aimé ceci.
19 janv. à 7 h 55
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 1,400
Mentions "j'aime": 525
Quoting: mv21227
Fair price but Monahan isn’t really an upgrade over Suter. He’s good at faceoffs and on the PP, but he’s bad at 5v5. Would rather target Novak/Henrique


You really need to force yourself to watch Monahan play 1 game. You are totally delusional on him
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage