SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Next Season

Créé par: RyanMclovin
Équipe: 2024-25 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 13 janv. 2024
Publié: 13 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
86 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
58 150 000 $
65 000 000 $
33 300 000 $
13 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
BOS
    Lindholm 2024 TDL
    CGY
    1. Merkulov, Georgi
    2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (BOS)
    2.
    NJD
    1. Ullmark, Linus
    2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (BOS)
    3. Choix de 5e ronde en 2026 (BOS)
    Rachats de contrats
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2024
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    2025
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    2026
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2087 500 000 $86 985 834 $50 000 $1 392 500 $514 166 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
    C, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    8 150 000 $8 150 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    11 250 000 $11 250 000 $
    AD
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
    AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
    C, AD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA
    Logo de Devils du New Jersey
    894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    AD, AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    870 000 $870 000 $ (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
    C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
    AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    925 000 $925 000 $
    C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    C, AD
    RFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
    DG
    NTC, NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
    DD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
    G
    RFA
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $$250K)
    DG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Devils du New Jersey
    3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA
    3 300 000 $3 300 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    13 janv. à 4 h 8
    #1
    Dr_Invictus
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 2,280
    Mentions "j'aime": 879
    I doubt Lindholm signs for 5 years
    13 janv. à 6 h 46
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 40,702
    Mentions "j'aime": 18,530
    Holtz probably involved. He has 1.5 years left at ELC…so the earliest we would move him would be Summer 2025.
    13 janv. à 11 h 3
    #3
    Démarrer sujet
    Pro
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2022
    Messages: 352
    Mentions "j'aime": 89
    Quoting: Dr_Invictus
    I doubt Lindholm signs for 5 years


    That’s true but at his age and what he’s reportedly asking I think he’s going to have to meet in the middle between either pay or term because I don’t see a guy of his age getting both. I think teams will be more weary after the Campbell and huberdeau contracts these last few seasnons and will be more careful giving out large contracts.
    13 janv. à 12 h 11
    #4
    I Love J Boqvist
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2023
    Messages: 12,124
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,221
    Fair value but NJD would prefer to move picks instead of holtz
    13 janv. à 15 h 14
    #5
    Dr_Invictus
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 2,280
    Mentions "j'aime": 879
    Quoting: RyanMclovin
    That’s true but at his age and what he’s reportedly asking I think he’s going to have to meet in the middle between either pay or term because I don’t see a guy of his age getting both. I think teams will be more weary after the Campbell and huberdeau contracts these last few seasnons and will be more careful giving out large contracts.


    You would assume so, but every year UFAs go for above what expected value dictates. He has held out this long because of term and AAV. He will get paid somewhere
    13 janv. à 17 h 46
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2023
    Messages: 3,931
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,224
    I view Vanacek at full salary as a negative. IMO, it’s worth a second to take him and Boston shouldn’t be that team. I think that deal favors NJ pretty significantly and would reject it outright

    I’d consider Holtz and Vanacek retained for Ullmark, but I think I’d rather have a first and Schmid instead of Holtz and Vanacek.
    14 janv. à 3 h 16
    #7
    Démarrer sujet
    Pro
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2022
    Messages: 352
    Mentions "j'aime": 89
    Quoting: Celtics21
    I view Vanacek at full salary as a negative. IMO, it’s worth a second to take him and Boston shouldn’t be that team. I think that deal favors NJ pretty significantly and would reject it outright

    I’d consider Holtz and Vanacek retained for Ullmark, but I think I’d rather have a first and Schmid instead of Holtz and Vanacek.


    Why would they need a goalie prospect when they have a young goalie who’s amazing? Benefits Boston more to add to the rest of the roster.
    14 janv. à 3 h 23
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2023
    Messages: 3,931
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,224
    Quoting: RyanMclovin
    Why would they need a goalie prospect when they have a young goalie who’s amazing? Benefits Boston more to add to the rest of the roster.


    It gives them a backup option that isn’t overpaid by 1.9m and frankly isn’t good. Vanacek is a bad salary add. Atleast Schmid isn’t overpaid.
    14 janv. à 3 h 26
    #9
    Démarrer sujet
    Pro
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2022
    Messages: 352
    Mentions "j'aime": 89
    Quoting: Celtics21
    It gives them a backup option that isn’t overpaid by 1.9m and frankly isn’t good. Vanacek is a bad salary add. Atleast Schmid isn’t overpaid.


    Vanacek is also only at one year remaining, if the contract was that much of an issue it would not be expensive to get a feeder team to eat the contract. That being said vanacek would also most likely play atleast somewhat better under bostons more responsibility in their own on top of being a more experienced team overall. I don’t think it’s a big ask to expect Boston to take this contract especially when dishing out a 5m dollar contract, most teams will have to move cap to take cap. Holtz is a very good prospect who will at minimum be a good trade piece or in bostons future top 9.
    14 janv. à 3 h 35
    #10
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2023
    Messages: 3,931
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,224
    Quoting: RyanMclovin
    Vanacek is also only at one year remaining, if the contract was that much of an issue it would not be expensive to get a feeder team to eat the contract. That being said vanacek would also most likely play atleast somewhat better under bostons more responsibility in their own on top of being a more experienced team overall. I don’t think it’s a big ask to expect Boston to take this contract especially when dishing out a 5m dollar contract, most teams will have to move cap to take cap. Holtz is a very good prospect who will at minimum be a good trade piece or in bostons future top 9.


    That comes at a cost. Ullmark for Holtz might make some sense.

    Dumping contracts come at a cost. One that this deal doesn’t appropriately compensate for.

    Retain 1.7M on Vanacek, I’d take him for free.
    14 janv. à 8 h 10
    #11
    I Love J Boqvist
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2023
    Messages: 12,124
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,221
    Quoting: Celtics21
    That comes at a cost. Ullmark for Holtz might make some sense.

    Dumping contracts come at a cost. One that this deal doesn’t appropriately compensate for.

    Retain 1.7M on Vanacek, I’d take him for free.


    Personally I’d say Boston adds in a Holtz for Ullmark swap (though I may be overrating Holtz

    My view:

    Holtz 1st+2nd, maybe a touch more (somewhere between Newhook and Dach)
    Ullmark 1st+3rd
    Vanacek: 3rd to dump (and if it costs more NJD will just hang in at least this year)
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage