SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

TDL 23-24 x 3

Créé par: Caps123
Équipe: 2023-24 Capitals de Washington
Date de création initiale: 9 janv. 2024
Publié: 9 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
WSH
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (NJD)
2.
WSH
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (PHI)
CAR
  1. Mantha, Anthony (2 850 000 $ retained)
3.
WSH
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
4.
5.
WSH
  1. Batherson, Drake
Détails additionnels:
OTT fans, what is the asking price?
OTT
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de WSH
Logo de PHI
Logo de EDM
Logo de WSH
Logo de BOS
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
2025
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de BOS
Logo de NJD
Logo de COL
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
2026
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $75 824 167 $20 000 $2 315 000 $7 675 833 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Capitals de Washington
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 166 667 $5 166 667 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
796 667 $796 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 975 000 $4 975 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 000 000 $$2M)
AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
863 333 $863 333 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
789 167 $789 167 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AD, AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
762 500 $762 500 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 225 000 $1 225 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 675 000 $2 675 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 062 500 $2 062 500 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 550 000 $3 550 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
825 000 $825 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
4 050 000 $4 050 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Capitals de Washington
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
9 200 000 $9 200 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance232 500 $$232K)
C
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
9 janv. à 8 h 54
#1
Leafs going to Leafs
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 9,963
Mentions "j'aime": 3,010
I don't know why the Caps do this, but Tre shakes your hand before you think twice
9 janv. à 9 h 27
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 31
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Lmao leafs do that immediately
9 janv. à 9 h 33
#3
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 8,734
Mentions "j'aime": 3,601
Canes are not the right team for Mantha.
markykins1 a aimé ceci.
9 janv. à 9 h 34
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 6,870
Mentions "j'aime": 1,989
How bout this year's 3rd for Lindgren? The extra yr basically makes it a 3rd.
9 janv. à 9 h 44
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,348
Mentions "j'aime": 1,911
These all look like very fair returns and I would be very happy with this deadline. Only other thing for me would be to move Pacioretty for whatever you get, even if its FC -- he's earned the right to get a shot with a contender.
brady_t12 et Caps123 a aimé ceci.
9 janv. à 10 h 25
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,546
Mentions "j'aime": 5,036
Canes say no, Mantha is your problem
9 janv. à 10 h 52
#7
Fantasy Hockey Pro
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 5,152
Mentions "j'aime": 2,281
Quoting: Caniac2000
Canes say no, Mantha is your problem


This is a pretty outdated take. Mantha has been fantastic this season. At 50% retained, you're getting a guy on pace for 45 points, over 20 goals, for 2.85M. Then you let him walk. For a team that seems to want to contend, this would be a great add. Nothing about Mantha is a "problem" anymore.
9 janv. à 10 h 59
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,546
Mentions "j'aime": 5,036
Quoting: brady_t12
This is a pretty outdated take. Mantha has been fantastic this season. At 50% retained, you're getting a guy on pace for 45 points, over 20 goals, for 2.85M. Then you let him walk. For a team that seems to want to contend, this would be a great add. Nothing about Mantha is a "problem" anymore.


His production isn't the problem. He's a defensive liability, his contract is tragic (even at 50% retained, it's not great) and the Canes have what 5 better wingers already? Bunting's on pace for50+ points, Jarvis, Teravainen, Necas, Svechnikov... he's your problem
9 janv. à 11 h 2
#9
Fantasy Hockey Pro
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 5,152
Mentions "j'aime": 2,281
Quoting: Caniac2000
His production isn't the problem. He's a defensive liability, his contract is tragic (even at 50% retained, it's not great) and the Canes have what 5 better wingers already? Bunting's on pace for50+ points, Jarvis, Teravainen, Necas, Svechnikov... he's your problem


lmao okay since you're so deadset on him being a "problem" have it your way bud
9 janv. à 11 h 4
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 4,333
Mentions "j'aime": 1,340
I’d do that
9 janv. à 11 h 48
#11
Boush
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 415
Mentions "j'aime": 61
I don't get it. I understand moving Mantha as a rental if the team is out of it, and moving TvR and Edmunson because we have a glut of third pairing defensemen. But why would we trade our best goalie and one of the best 4th line centers in the game when their combined cap hit is under $2.5 mil for one more year, with no real options to replace either, both for late 2nd round picks, and why would we bring back Samsonov, who sucks?
9 janv. à 12 h 8
#12
Dougie HIMilton
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,071
Mentions "j'aime": 1,628
Can the Devils have Mantha too?
9 janv. à 12 h 9
#13
Dougie HIMilton
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,071
Mentions "j'aime": 1,628
Quoting: brady_t12
This is a pretty outdated take. Mantha has been fantastic this season. At 50% retained, you're getting a guy on pace for 45 points, over 20 goals, for 2.85M. Then you let him walk. For a team that seems to want to contend, this would be a great add. Nothing about Mantha is a "problem" anymore.


It wasn't last year either. Mantha had great underlyings.
9 janv. à 13 h 8
#14
twentyeighteen
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 1,250
Mentions "j'aime": 497
Quoting: Caniac555
Canes are not the right team for Mantha.


Do you see how I liked your comment? wink
9 janv. à 13 h 42
#15
Fantasy Hockey Pro
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 5,152
Mentions "j'aime": 2,281
Quoting: HeadHighSauce
It wasn't last year either. Mantha had great underlyings.


Defensively he was okay for sure, but he was a non-option offensively. Now he’s pretty good on both sides of the puck.
9 janv. à 13 h 49
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 1,023
Mentions "j'aime": 330
What’s your price on Jensen OP?
9 janv. à 15 h 56
#17
Démarrer sujet
Caps123
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 145
Mentions "j'aime": 35
Quoting: SwarmChair
What’s your price on Jensen OP?


I happily would move Jensen for a 2nd and 4th OR 3rd and 4th - no salary retention.
SwarmChair a aimé ceci.
9 janv. à 17 h 5
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 5,903
Mentions "j'aime": 1,537
Caps have nothing OTT would want in a trade for Bath
9 janv. à 18 h 58
#19
Dougie HIMilton
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,071
Mentions "j'aime": 1,628
Quoting: brady_t12
Defensively he was okay for sure, but he was a non-option offensively. Now he’s pretty good on both sides of the puck.


Iirc his offensive analytics were great too
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage