Rangers accept.
Does anyone agree or disagree?

I think that's approximately fair value from the Hawks end. These would take up both of our remaining retention spots, so would have to be sure there aren't any other trades going on that would require retention to get a bigger return, but I would think at this point Foligno is the only other one who would fit that bill and I don't know that they want to trade him.

I think this proposal has legs, especially if there is a third team involved to use a retention slot.