SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Getting the Gang Back for One Final Cup Run

Créé par: TGSCraig
Équipe: 2023-24 Devils du New Jersey
Date de création initiale: 15 déc. 2023
Publié: 15 déc. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Accurate/Prorated
LTIR activée: Non
Journées à la saison: 192
Journées restantes: 125
Saison restante: 65%
Masse salariale projetée avant les jours restants Info-bulle : 82 587 933 $
Description
I think retention to get Gibson down to a 4.5 million cap hit over the next 4 years is the sweet-spot where Anaheim could get a legitimate asset for him. I think the pick is something like the Devils 1st for the Ducks 4th if they don't reach the conference final (SJ deal) and their 2nd this year and next year if they do.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
Transactions
NJD
  1. Gibson, John (1 900 000 $ retained)
  2. Henrique, Adam
ANA
  1. Tierney, Chris
  2. Vanecek, Vitek
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (NJD)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (NJD)
Rachats de contrats
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de COL
Logo de NJD
Logo de NSH
2025
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
2026
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $76 467 045 $422 500 $5 482 500 $7 032 955 $
Masse salariale proratée

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
6 000 000 $3 906 250 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
8 000 000 $5 208 333 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 125 000 $1 383 464 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
8 800 000 $5 729 167 $
AG, AD
UFA - 8
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
7 250 000 $4 720 052 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
7 875 000 $5 126 953 $
AD, AG
UFA - 8
1 000 000 $651 042 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $948 079 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
894 167 $582 140 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 150 000 $2 050 781 $
C, AG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 400 000 $911 458 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
894 167 $582 140 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 350 000 $878 906 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 000 000 $651 042 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 400 000 $2 213 542 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
918 333 $597 873 $ (Bonis de performance3 250 000 $$3M)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 500 000 $2 929 688 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
925 000 $602 214 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
4 400 000 $2 864 583 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
850 833 $553 928 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 050 000 $683 594 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 850 000 $1 204 427 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 100 000 $716 146 $
DG/DD, AG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 000 000 $651 042 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
9 000 000 $5 859 375 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
15 déc. 2023 à 10 h 31
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 2,150
Mentions "j'aime": 882
Not enough value going to the Ducks
15 déc. 2023 à 10 h 37
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 71
Mentions "j'aime": 10
Quoting: Logicalicesports
Not enough value going to the Ducks


Show me a goalie who has gotten significantly more than that, especially one whose contract is considered underwater by most metrics? The goalie deals recently (Georgiev for two 3rds and a 5th), Vanecek for a 3rd.

This is pretty comparable to Darcy Kuemper with retention for a late 1st and a 3rd that the Avs and Coyotes did a few years back, and Keumper was much cheaper then than Gibson is now.

Maybe you could quibble and say the Devils should add another non-draft pick asset like any non-Seamus Casey prospect, and I think that most Devils fans would be fine with that.
15 déc. 2023 à 10 h 56
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 2,150
Mentions "j'aime": 882
Quoting: TGSCraig
Show me a goalie who has gotten significantly more than that, especially one whose contract is considered underwater by most metrics? The goalie deals recently (Georgiev for two 3rds and a 5th), Vanecek for a 3rd.

This is pretty comparable to Darcy Kuemper with retention for a late 1st and a 3rd that the Avs and Coyotes did a few years back, and Keumper was much cheaper then than Gibson is now.

Maybe you could quibble and say the Devils should add another non-draft pick asset like any non-Seamus Casey prospect, and I think that most Devils fans would be fine with that.


They are not comparable to a multi-time all star goalie that is still in his prime. You listed two caps goalies there that not Gibson's level. Vitek is far from Gibson and Kuemper although good is also not close.

All-star goaltender retained plus a good forward. You are way off the mark
15 déc. 2023 à 11 h 23
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 71
Mentions "j'aime": 10
Quoting: Logicalicesports
They are not comparable to a multi-time all star goalie that is still in his prime. You listed two caps goalies there that not Gibson's level. Vitek is far from Gibson and Kuemper although good is also not close.

All-star goaltender retained plus a good forward. You are way off the mark


I truly don't know a single person on Earth who believes John Gibson is still in his prime. Darcy Keumper was a better goalie (and still is a better goalie) than john Gibson is now when that trade happened.
15 déc. 2023 à 11 h 24
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 71
Mentions "j'aime": 10
Is John Gibson still a good goalie? Yes. Is he four years past his prime? Also yes.
15 déc. 2023 à 11 h 50
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 16,071
Mentions "j'aime": 12,368
This isn’t a legit asset for the amount of retention

We aren’t shopping Gibby so you will have to give an offer that makes us not want to say no
GiggywithGibby a aimé ceci.
15 déc. 2023 à 12 h 44
#7
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 12,887
Mentions "j'aime": 3,439
Quoting: GeneralLandro
This isn’t a legit asset for the amount of retention

We aren’t shopping Gibby so you will have to give an offer that makes us not want to say no


The retention is what makes Gibson not a cap dump.

Why do ducks fans keep ignoring the fact that gibson has the 3rd biggest goalie contract in the league rn.

Gibson at 4.5 million for a 2nd 👍
3rd+Vanacek for a 6 million dollar Henrique

How much will Henrique get as a free agent?

How much would Gibson have gotten if he was a free agent this past offseason?

How much would get if he were to be becoming a free agent now?

If John gibsons deal were voided today, what contract would the Anaheim ducks offer him to stay
15 déc. 2023 à 12 h 50
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 71
Mentions "j'aime": 10
Quoting: dgibb10
The retention is what makes Gibson not a cap dump


Yeah, any less retention than 1.4 million to put him at around 5 million makes him an underwater asset. He wouldn't get anywhere in the ballpark of 4 yr/5 AAV on the open market after 3 years of sub .900 SV% and a grand total of 1.2 GSaX in the first 20 starts this year (22nd among all goalies). The value is that he is a perfectly fine, above average starting goalie. You're not trading a front-line, Vezina candidate starter.

The Ducks would also have to retain 2.9 million to send Henrique to literally any other team. Not having to retain that salary to send him to the Devils gets them halfway to the amount of retained money on Gibson right there.

Like I said I think a 1st or two 2nds is probably a best case scenario for Gibson. Maybe a B-minus prospect like Graeme Clarke or Nolan Foote they can dream on is also in there. I don't know.

Either way, it's unlikely they're going to be able to trade Gibson without retaining some of that money.
15 déc. 2023 à 12 h 52
#9
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 12,887
Mentions "j'aime": 3,439
Quoting: TGSCraig
Yeah, any less retention than 1.4 million to put him at around 5 million makes him an underwater asset. He wouldn't get anywhere in the ballpark of 4 yr/5 AAV on the open market after 3 years of sub .900 SV% and a grand total of 1.2 GSaX in the first 20 starts this year (22nd among all goalies). The value is that he is a perfectly fine, above average starting goalie. You're not trading a front-line, Vezina candidate starter.

The Ducks would also have to retain 2.9 million to send Henrique to literally any other team. Not having to retain that salary to send him to the Devils gets them halfway to the amount of retained money on Gibson right there.

Like I said I think a 1st or two 2nds is probably a best case scenario for Gibson. Maybe a B-minus prospect like Graeme Clarke or Nolan Foote they can dream on is also in there. I don't know.

Either way, it's unlikely they're going to be able to trade Gibson without retaining some of that money.


My logic is and always will be this. If I can go out into unrestricted free agency and get the same or better production for the same amount of money, you have 0 or negative value
15 déc. 2023 à 14 h 2
#10
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 10,356
Mentions "j'aime": 7,144
Quoting: TGSCraig
Yeah, any less retention than 1.4 million to put him at around 5 million makes him an underwater asset. He wouldn't get anywhere in the ballpark of 4 yr/5 AAV on the open market after 3 years of sub .900 SV% and a grand total of 1.2 GSaX in the first 20 starts this year (22nd among all goalies). The value is that he is a perfectly fine, above average starting goalie. You're not trading a front-line, Vezina candidate starter.

The Ducks would also have to retain 2.9 million to send Henrique to literally any other team. Not having to retain that salary to send him to the Devils gets them halfway to the amount of retained money on Gibson right there.

Like I said I think a 1st or two 2nds is probably a best case scenario for Gibson. Maybe a B-minus prospect like Graeme Clarke or Nolan Foote they can dream on is also in there. I don't know.

Either way, it's unlikely they're going to be able to trade Gibson without retaining some of that money.


Where's the first then, you e offered a 2nd, a 3rd, the goalie you don't want, and some depth forward.

Frankly, Anaheim either won't retain, or will retain minimal money on Gibson, claiming we don't have to retain on Henrique is missing the point that Anaheim would be on the hook for thee additional years of salary for Gibson, it's just not happening, and sure as **** not for this offer.

Either Gibson is still an elite goalie, and that's why you are trading for him, or he's not, and You're on here just trolling Anaheim fans.
15 déc. 2023 à 15 h 29
#11
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 12,887
Mentions "j'aime": 3,439
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Where's the first then, you e offered a 2nd, a 3rd, the goalie you don't want, and some depth forward.

Frankly, Anaheim either won't retain, or will retain minimal money on Gibson, claiming we don't have to retain on Henrique is missing the point that Anaheim would be on the hook for thee additional years of salary for Gibson, it's just not happening, and sure as **** not for this offer.

Either Gibson is still an elite goalie, and that's why you are trading for him, or he's not, and You're on here just trolling Anaheim fans.


Gibson is not an elite goalie hope this helps.

Let’s use Jarry as our UFA comp (even though he’s younger and better than Gibson).


He has an AAV of 5.4 million.

Gibson here is being traded at an AAV of 4.5 with retention. So here he provides about 4 mill in surplus value. 2nd+3rd.

Let’s set our Vanacek value at about 2.4 million (that’s what Mackenzie Blackwood got, for a goalie who previously was shown to be a starter, still relatively young, after a down year)

That’s -2 million in value

On Henrique what’s a good UFA comp. hmm so many mediocre wingers to go with. Maybe an Engvall, a domi, an athanasiou even.

Let’s go with 4 mill tho. So -1.6 mill in value.

Seems like the value going both ways is reasonable
16 déc. 2023 à 16 h 16
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 71
Mentions "j'aime": 10
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Where's the first then, you e offered a 2nd, a 3rd, the goalie you don't want, and some depth forward.

Frankly, Anaheim either won't retain, or will retain minimal money on Gibson, claiming we don't have to retain on Henrique is missing the point that Anaheim would be on the hook for thee additional years of salary for Gibson, it's just not happening, and sure as **** not for this offer.

Either Gibson is still an elite goalie, and that's why you are trading for him, or he's not, and You're on here just trolling Anaheim fans.


Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Where's the first then, you e offered a 2nd, a 3rd, the goalie you don't want, and some depth forward.

Frankly, Anaheim either won't retain, or will retain minimal money on Gibson, claiming we don't have to retain on Henrique is missing the point that Anaheim would be on the hook for thee additional years of salary for Gibson, it's just not happening, and sure as **** not for this offer.

Either Gibson is still an elite goalie, and that's why you are trading for him, or he's not, and You're on here just trolling Anaheim fans.


I wrote in the description what the two scenarios are. We don’t currently have our 1st guaranteed this year, if we had our first it would be in the deal. But no there’s definitely a third scenario besides the two at the end of your post: John Gibson is a good goalie, past his prime in which he was elite, who is a significant upgrade over what the Devils currently have (hence the draft picks)
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage