Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Where's the first then, you e offered a 2nd, a 3rd, the goalie you don't want, and some depth forward.
Frankly, Anaheim either won't retain, or will retain minimal money on Gibson, claiming we don't have to retain on Henrique is missing the point that Anaheim would be on the hook for thee additional years of salary for Gibson, it's just not happening, and sure as **** not for this offer.
Either Gibson is still an elite goalie, and that's why you are trading for him, or he's not, and You're on here just trolling Anaheim fans.
Gibson is not an elite goalie hope this helps.
Let’s use Jarry as our UFA comp (even though he’s younger and better than Gibson).
He has an AAV of 5.4 million.
Gibson here is being traded at an AAV of 4.5 with retention. So here he provides about 4 mill in surplus value. 2nd+3rd.
Let’s set our Vanacek value at about 2.4 million (that’s what Mackenzie Blackwood got, for a goalie who previously was shown to be a starter, still relatively young, after a down year)
That’s -2 million in value
On Henrique what’s a good UFA comp. hmm so many mediocre wingers to go with. Maybe an Engvall, a domi, an athanasiou even.
Let’s go with 4 mill tho. So -1.6 mill in value.
Seems like the value going both ways is reasonable