SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Creating a third line

Créé par: Greysuits
Équipe: 2023-24 Sabres de Buffalo
Date de création initiale: 9 déc. 2023
Publié: 9 déc. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
PHI
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (BUF)
2.
3.
BUF
    Future considerations
    4.
    BUF
      Future Considerations
      Rachats de contrats
      Enfoui
      Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
      2024
      Logo de BUF
      Logo de BUF
      Logo de BUF
      Logo de BUF
      2025
      Logo de BUF
      Logo de BUF
      Logo de BUF
      Logo de BUF
      Logo de MIN
      Logo de BUF
      Logo de BUF
      Logo de BUF
      Logo de NSH
      2026
      Logo de BUF
      Logo de BUF
      Logo de BUF
      Logo de BUF
      Logo de BUF
      Logo de BUF
      Logo de BUF
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      2383 500 000 $79 468 213 $0 $5 220 000 $4 031 787 $
      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
      9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
      AG, AD
      NMC
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
      7 142 857 $7 142 857 $
      C
      UFA - 7
      Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
      7 100 000 $7 100 000 $
      C, AG
      UFA - 7
      Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
      855 833 $855 833 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
      AG, AD
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
      2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
      AG, C
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
      863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
      AD, AG
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
      3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
      C, AG
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Predators de Nashville
      2 857 143 $2 857 143 $
      C, AD
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
      950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance650 000 $$650K)
      AG
      RFA - 3
      Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
      1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
      AG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
      863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance412 500 $$412K)
      C, AG
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
      3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 2
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
      6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
      DG/DD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
      925 000 $925 000 $
      DG
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Predators de Nashville
      5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
      G
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
      916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance1 850 000 $$2M)
      DG/DD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
      2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
      DD
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
      925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
      G
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
      4 285 714 $4 285 714 $
      DG
      UFA - 7
      Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
      3 333 333 $3 333 333 $
      DD
      UFA - 3
      Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
      Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
      2 500 000 $2 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
      AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
      4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
      AD, AG
      M-NTC
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
      2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
      C
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
      2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
      AG, C
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
      3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 1

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner
      9 déc. 2023 à 10 h 56
      #1
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2021
      Messages: 15,416
      Mentions "j'aime": 11,804
      Philly didn’t trade Laughton for a 1 and a 2, they aren’t trading him for just a 2
      9 déc. 2023 à 10 h 56
      #2
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: oct. 2022
      Messages: 5,343
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,416
      Nashville obviously accepts
      9 déc. 2023 à 10 h 57
      #3
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: oct. 2022
      Messages: 5,343
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,416
      Quoting: GeneralLandro
      Philly didn’t trade Laughton for a 1 and a 2, they aren’t trading him for just a 2


      Do we have any actual proof they were offered a 1st+ for a career 3rd liner?
      9 déc. 2023 à 11 h 35
      #4
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2017
      Messages: 4,789
      Mentions "j'aime": 2,008
      Quoting: GeneralLandro
      Philly didn’t trade Laughton for a 1 and a 2, they aren’t trading him for just a 2


      I would say a Laughton deal revolves around a 1st and Krebs..... but Leafs fans are delusional🤣
      9 déc. 2023 à 11 h 38
      #5
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2017
      Messages: 4,789
      Mentions "j'aime": 2,008
      Quoting: Ennis
      Do we have any actual proof they were offered a 1st+ for a career 3rd liner?


      Issue here is Laughton isn't the prototypical 3rd liner.

      He suffers from what I call "Mike Ricci Syndrom": not good enough to be a permanent top 6, but too good to be a permanent bottom 6.

      3 years of Laughton at 3 million? Yeah.... that's a late 1st at least.
      9 déc. 2023 à 11 h 55
      #6
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: oct. 2022
      Messages: 5,343
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,416
      Quoting: swinny
      Issue here is Laughton isn't the prototypical 3rd liner.

      He suffers from what I call "Mike Ricci Syndrom": not good enough to be a permanent top 6, but too good to be a permanent bottom 6.

      3 years of Laughton at 3 million? Yeah.... that's a late 1st at least.


      I guess I wouldn't spend a 1st+ on a guy who's been a career 30pt player.
      9 déc. 2023 à 12 h 28
      #7
      Sabres fan
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2020
      Messages: 4,871
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,041
      Quoting: Ennis
      Nashville obviously accepts

      Of course they do. That is at least one first round asset too many. I don’t think that highly of Colton Sissons, still like him.
      AntiAnalytics a aimé ceci.
      9 déc. 2023 à 12 h 52
      #8
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: nov. 2017
      Messages: 27,795
      Mentions "j'aime": 14,520
      You could also create a 3rd line by activating tuch and not playing cozens on the wing
      AntiAnalytics a aimé ceci.
      9 déc. 2023 à 13 h 15
      #9
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: févr. 2018
      Messages: 1,521
      Mentions "j'aime": 769
      Wow....3 1st round picks for Saros? I mean....That's way too much. Not to mention that UPL has better stats than Saros this year...

      You're just giving away Olofsson...for nothing? Umm, he's better than Sissons...
      9 déc. 2023 à 13 h 18
      #10
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: oct. 2022
      Messages: 5,343
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,416
      Quoting: worldwidesensei
      You're just giving away Olofsson...for nothing? Umm, he's better than Sissons...


      Is he, though? Olofsson is a one dimensional shooter with bad possession metrics. Sissons is a defensive 3C who just happens to have more points than Olofsson.
      9 déc. 2023 à 13 h 18
      #11
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: févr. 2018
      Messages: 1,521
      Mentions "j'aime": 769
      Quoting: swinny
      I would say a Laughton deal revolves around a 1st and Krebs..... but Leafs fans are delusional🤣


      Now it's 2 1sts for Laughs....lol.
      9 déc. 2023 à 13 h 22
      #12
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: févr. 2018
      Messages: 1,521
      Mentions "j'aime": 769
      Quoting: Ennis
      Is he, though? Olofsson is a one dimensional shooter with bad possession metrics. Sissons is a defensive 3C who just happens to have more points than Olofsson.


      5v5 Pts/60

      Olofsson 2.24
      Sissons 1.34

      GF%

      Olofsson 47.62
      Sissons 40.91


      Looks considerably better to me.
      9 déc. 2023 à 13 h 26
      #13
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2017
      Messages: 4,789
      Mentions "j'aime": 2,008
      Quoting: worldwidesensei
      Now it's 2 1sts for Laughs....lol.


      Laugh, but for what Laughton is, plus that contract, it wouldn't put it beyond the realm of possibility
      9 déc. 2023 à 13 h 28
      #14
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: oct. 2022
      Messages: 5,343
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,416
      Quoting: worldwidesensei
      5v5 Pts/60

      Olofsson 2.24
      Sissons 1.34

      GF%

      Olofsson 47.62
      Sissons 40.91


      Looks considerably better to me.


      P/60 is irrelevant to what OP is trying create in the post. He's trying to create a more defensive third line, to which Olofsson does not fit. He is a pylon in the defensive zone.

      I'd take a 30 point defensive Sissons at 2.8 over a one dimensional 40 point Olofsson at 4.7
      9 déc. 2023 à 13 h 40
      #15
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: nov. 2017
      Messages: 27,795
      Mentions "j'aime": 14,520
      Quoting: worldwidesensei
      Now it's 2 1sts for Laughs....lol.


      You love saying this.

      Erik Johnson, jokiharju, girgensons, jost ,okposo for McDavid. What? It's 5 firsts!
      9 déc. 2023 à 13 h 42
      #16
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: févr. 2018
      Messages: 1,521
      Mentions "j'aime": 769
      Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
      You love saying this.

      Erik Johnson, jokiharju, girgensons, jost ,okposo for McDavid. What? It's 5 firsts!


      Considering Krebs just became waivers-eligible, yes, he's worth at least a 1st...if not more.
      9 déc. 2023 à 13 h 44
      #17
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: nov. 2017
      Messages: 27,795
      Mentions "j'aime": 14,520
      Quoting: worldwidesensei
      Considering Krebs just became waivers-eligible, yes, he's worth at least a 1st...if not more.


      Well, he's not. He's playing 4th line on a non playoff team in his d+5 season
      9 déc. 2023 à 13 h 48
      #18
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: févr. 2018
      Messages: 1,521
      Mentions "j'aime": 769
      Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
      Well, he's not. He's playing 4th line on a non playoff team in his d+5 season


      He's 14th in his draft class in points...

      I would need to wait D+5 years to only hope a 2024 1st round pick is 14th in his draft class.
      9 déc. 2023 à 13 h 58
      #19
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: févr. 2018
      Messages: 1,521
      Mentions "j'aime": 769
      Modifié 9 déc. 2023 à 14 h 3
      5v5 GA/60:

      Laughton 3.06 (Olofsson 3.08)
      Krebs 1.53

      5v5 ATOI:

      Laughton 12:02
      Krebs 10:59

      GF%
      Laughton 42.86
      Krebs 53.33
      AntiAnalytics a aimé ceci.
      9 déc. 2023 à 15 h 30
      #20
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2023
      Messages: 5,614
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,744
      Quoting: swinny
      Issue here is Laughton isn't the prototypical 3rd liner.

      He suffers from what I call "Mike Ricci Syndrom": not good enough to be a permanent top 6, but too good to be a permanent bottom 6.

      3 years of Laughton at 3 million? Yeah.... that's a late 1st at least.


      Sabres 1st won’t be “late” though
      And that makes a HUGE difference imo

      Laughton might be good enough for a LATE 1st,
      but not a MID 1st- and certainly not a mid1st + Krebs- no way
      9 déc. 2023 à 22 h 36
      #21
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2017
      Messages: 4,789
      Mentions "j'aime": 2,008
      Quoting: AntiAnalytics
      Sabres 1st won’t be “late” though
      And that makes a HUGE difference imo

      Laughton might be good enough for a LATE 1st,
      but not a MID 1st- and certainly not a mid1st + Krebs- no way


      I think that maybe undervalued Laughton. But that is me and my evaluation of Laughton and his game.

      But to suggest Laughton isn't worth a 1st I belive is an error. The player is very good. The contract is very good.

      If the Sabres were in on Laughton, either that 1st carries conditions, or Philly is adding to Laughton.

      But I definitely stand by my statement: if Philly is entertaining a move with Buffalo, it starts with a 1st and Krebs. No reason for Philly to make the deal otherwise.
      9 déc. 2023 à 23 h 35
      #22
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2023
      Messages: 5,614
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,744
      Quoting: swinny
      I think that maybe undervalued Laughton. But that is me and my evaluation of Laughton and his game.

      But to suggest Laughton isn't worth a 1st I belive is an error. The player is very good. The contract is very good.

      If the Sabres were in on Laughton, either that 1st carries conditions, or Philly is adding to Laughton.

      But I definitely stand by my statement: if Philly is entertaining a move with Buffalo, it starts with a 1st and Krebs. No reason for Philly to make the deal otherwise.


      U can stand by it all you want,
      but it’s still crazy

      Laughton is an above average 3rd liner
      Maybe even a “good” one

      But he’s not worth a mid1st OR Krebs,
      let alone BOTH
      That’s just absurd to even suggest

      The Sabres don’t become a Cup Contender by adding Laughton
      Hell, he doesn’t even get them in the playoffs
      You’re overvaluing this guy like crazy

      Sabres aren’t gonna pay like that,
      just to miss the playoffs with him
      Especially not with all the forward talent we have (& have coming) who have a higher ceiling than he does
      10 déc. 2023 à 11 h 33
      #23
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2017
      Messages: 4,789
      Mentions "j'aime": 2,008
      Quoting: AntiAnalytics
      U can stand by it all you want,
      but it’s still crazy

      Laughton is an above average 3rd liner
      Maybe even a “good” one

      But he’s not worth a mid1st OR Krebs,
      let alone BOTH
      That’s just absurd to even suggest

      The Sabres don’t become a Cup Contender by adding Laughton
      Hell, he doesn’t even get them in the playoffs
      You’re overvaluing this guy like crazy

      Sabres aren’t gonna pay like that,
      just to miss the playoffs with him
      Especially not with all the forward talent we have (& have coming) who have a higher ceiling than he does


      I never claimed the Sabres should be in on him. I said IF.

      Is it a price I pay? No. But I am suggesting for where Philly is, what Laughton amd and what that contract is..... it probably takes that.

      We can agree to disagree. What is forum is all about..... different thought processes engaging.
      10 déc. 2023 à 14 h 31
      #24
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2023
      Messages: 5,614
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,744
      Quoting: swinny
      I never claimed the Sabres should be in on him. I said IF.

      Is it a price I pay? No. But I am suggesting for where Philly is, what Laughton amd and what that contract is..... it probably takes that.

      We can agree to disagree. What is forum is all about..... different thought processes engaging.


      If Philly gets a return like that I’ll be shocked
      Seems u might be thinking Krebs doesn’t have much trade value- which could be right- but there’s ZERO CHANCE the Sabres will just dump him & “sell low”
      10 déc. 2023 à 21 h 18
      #25
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2017
      Messages: 4,789
      Mentions "j'aime": 2,008
      Quoting: AntiAnalytics
      If Philly gets a return like that I’ll be shocked
      Seems u might be thinking Krebs doesn’t have much trade value- which could be right- but there’s ZERO CHANCE the Sabres will just dump him & “sell low”


      Could be right, but Adams and Company are also reaching a piss or get of the pot point with Krebs.

      Kulich is coming.....
       
      Répondre
      To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
      Question:
      Options:
      Ajouter une option
      Soumettre le sondage