SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

2nd overall

Créé par: Joblow
Équipe: 2024-25 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 5 déc. 2023
Publié: 5 déc. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Mtl Draft Lindstrom 2nd overall, they also trade the 23th pick acquire in a 2023 deadline along with Colorado 2nd round pick to jump at 18th and select Tij Iginla
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
64 500 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Lindstrom, Cayden
3950 000 $
Iginla, Tij
3925 000 $
Transactions
1.
MTL
CGY
  1. Harris, Jordan
  2. Kovacevic, Johnathan
Détails additionnels:
Gone before the start of the season
2.
MTL
  1. Bennett, Sam
Détails additionnels:
Florida will have tough decision with notable ufa to sign
Bennett is a collateral damage but still managed to get good assets.
FLA
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (MTL)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (PIT)
Détails additionnels:
Montreal had caracter and get option.
3.
MTL
    Gone also
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Enfoui
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2024
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de WSH
    2025
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de DET
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    2026
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2287 700 000 $74 459 583 $1 022 500 $4 977 500 $13 240 417 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    3 362 500 $3 362 500 $
    C, AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
    AD, AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
    C, AG
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
    C
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Panthers de la Floride
    4 425 000 $4 425 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    897 500 $897 500 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 3
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance420 000 $$420K)
    DG/DD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    DD
    RFA
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
    G
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
    DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    890 000 $890 000 $
    G
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    925 000 $925 000 $
    DG
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    867 500 $867 500 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
    DG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
    G
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    812 500 $812 500 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    5 déc. 2023 à 21 h 35
    #1
    FKA Bigtittielarper
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2020
    Messages: 7,728
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,226
    Gotta think Florida declines I gotta think he brings back a first all day long
    CBA a aimé ceci.
    5 déc. 2023 à 22 h 0
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2023
    Messages: 1,400
    Mentions "j'aime": 525
    Wtf is that Barron contract lmfao
    1.7M MAXIMUM for 2 years
    Engstrom ??????
    This is unrealistic and wouldn’t even be a good offseason
    5 déc. 2023 à 22 h 4
    #3
    Prime Primeau
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2023
    Messages: 5,470
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,173
    Quoting: CBA
    Wtf is that Barron contract lmfao
    1.7M MAXIMUM for 2 years
    Engstrom ??????
    This is unrealistic and wouldn’t even be a good offseason

    Barron 1000% deserve more than 2m. He has been our second best D this season. As of Engstrom, I agree it’s weird. And we draft Eiserman if we end up with the second overall pick
    CBA a aimé ceci.
    5 déc. 2023 à 22 h 37
    #4
    Sennecke is a gem
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2022
    Messages: 4,182
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,305
    No point in drafting Lindstrom 2nd OA. We can easily move to 4 and draft him. If he somehow gets drafted in the top 3 as we move down spots, we get Eiserman (Levshunov is a top 3 lock IMO due to the number of teams needing him like SJ, CHI, ANA, probably PHI, EDM if they don't rise, you get the point)
    LIRIK a aimé ceci.
    6 déc. 2023 à 1 h 1
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2023
    Messages: 1,400
    Mentions "j'aime": 525
    Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
    Barron 1000% deserve more than 2m. He has been our second best D this season. As of Engstrom, I agree it’s weird. And we draft Eiserman if we end up with the second overall pick


    Are you only looking at the goals column ? Guhle Matheson Kovacevic Struble all outplayed him he’s been better than Lindstrom and Xhekaj and arguably Harris. Savard way better when healthy as well. He should get 2 years at 1.7M or 2 years at 1.4M
    6 déc. 2023 à 7 h 2
    #6
    Prime Primeau
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2023
    Messages: 5,470
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,173
    Quoting: CBA
    Are you only looking at the goals column ? Guhle Matheson Kovacevic Struble all outplayed him he’s been better than Lindstrom and Xhekaj and arguably Harris. Savard way better when healthy as well. He should get 2 years at 1.7M or 2 years at 1.4M


    He is surprisingly very good defensively. He deive the play offensively. Matheson is the only one who is better and arguably Guhle. Barron should get around 3m
    Joblow a aimé ceci.
    6 déc. 2023 à 12 h 13
    #7
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2022
    Messages: 1,756
    Mentions "j'aime": 694
    Quoting: SomeonesOffended
    Gotta think Florida declines I gotta think he brings back a first all day long


    Quoting: CBA
    Wtf is that Barron contract lmfao
    1.7M MAXIMUM for 2 years
    Engstrom ??????
    This is unrealistic and wouldn’t even be a good offseason


    Barron have been playing great since the start of the season. He developing curve just go up and up. Not sure why all the hate for Barron but he will be a major part of the Habs for many season. It’s not perfect but for a 22 years old kids who is just starting is career he does very well. Mtl goes long term, they have the cap space to overpay the front year but when they will be in tight cap space this deal will become a great one.
    6 déc. 2023 à 12 h 16
    #8
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2022
    Messages: 1,756
    Mentions "j'aime": 694
    Quoting: SomeonesOffended
    Gotta think Florida declines I gotta think he brings back a first all day long


    Olivier Bjorkstrand was traded for a lesser return. That a very good comparable to start with. Florida lose leverage with cap crunch. Bennett is also a UFA after the season so no team will give up a first in the offseason. Victor Arvidsson would also be a good start to built a trade.
    SomeonesOffended a aimé ceci.
    6 déc. 2023 à 12 h 20
    #9
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2022
    Messages: 1,756
    Mentions "j'aime": 694
    Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
    Barron 1000% deserve more than 2m. He has been our second best D this season. As of Engstrom, I agree it’s weird. And we draft Eiserman if we end up with the second overall pick


    Why it’s weird that Engstrom play next year. He already have 2 full pro season. He play over 20 minutes night after night and he is doing great. He is a elite skater with good offensive instincts and have been working real hard on is defensive game. Pretty sure he will make the team next season.
    6 déc. 2023 à 12 h 23
    #10
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2022
    Messages: 1,756
    Mentions "j'aime": 694
    Quoting: Caufield
    No point in drafting Lindstrom 2nd OA. We can easily move to 4 and draft him. If he somehow gets drafted in the top 3 as we move down spots, we get Eiserman (Levshunov is a top 3 lock IMO due to the number of teams needing him like SJ, CHI, ANA, probably PHI, EDM if they don't rise, you get the point)


    That your opinion, but Lindtrom won’t make it to number 4. He is a better version of Byfield. He hasn’t stop impressing since the start of the season. I don’t gave a **** about Eiserman. If i drafted Lindstrom 2nd overall it’s because i do think he is the second best players in that draft buddy. You get the point!
    6 déc. 2023 à 15 h 44
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2023
    Messages: 1,400
    Mentions "j'aime": 525
    Quoting: Joblow
    Barron have been playing great since the start of the season. He developing curve just go up and up. Not sure why all the hate for Barron but he will be a major part of the Habs for many season. It’s not perfect but for a 22 years old kids who is just starting is career he does very well. Mtl goes long term, they have the cap space to overpay the front year but when they will be in tight cap space this deal will become a great one.


    Barron will never be worth 4.5M in his entire career ... it's like the people complaining about not going higher and long terms with Harris ... Barron isn't playing like a top 4 dman and shouldn't get paid like one
    MTL will never be cap strap for the next 10 years come on. Nobody need big extension and only big contract are going to expire (Dvorak 4.45M, Allen 3.85M, Armia 3.4M) and only Guhle and Slaf to sign.
    You bridge everyone not named Kaiden Guhle, the only exception would be Slafkovsky
    6 déc. 2023 à 16 h 18
    #12
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2022
    Messages: 1,756
    Mentions "j'aime": 694
    Quoting: CBA
    Barron will never be worth 4.5M in his entire career ... it's like the people complaining about not going higher and long terms with Harris ... Barron isn't playing like a top 4 dman and shouldn't get paid like one
    MTL will never be cap strap for the next 10 years come on. Nobody need big extension and only big contract are going to expire (Dvorak 4.45M, Allen 3.85M, Armia 3.4M) and only Guhle and Slaf to sign.
    You bridge everyone not named Kaiden Guhle, the only exception would be Slafkovsky


    Barron is already a top 4 d-man end of discussion. He play top four minutes at 22 years old. He don’t look out of play in that role. Kid’s doesn’t even have a 100 games under is belt. If he continues to progress like he did since last year, there no concern about. You clearly don’t like him but i am not sure why? Kovacevic is not better and there a big reason why Barron have surpassed him in the d-men hierarchy. If Barron wasn’t good he would be playing Struble, Kovacevic, Lindstrom the big minutes he give to Barron. I guess Martin St louis see the thing like i see them.
    Bref tu aimes pas Barron ta le droit mais t’es mieuxde t’habituer parce qu’il va être a Montreal longtemps surtout si il continue à améliorer son jeu défensif et ca prise de décision avec la rondelle.
    6 déc. 2023 à 17 h 32
    #13
    Prime Primeau
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2023
    Messages: 5,470
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,173
    Quoting: Joblow
    Why it’s weird that Engstrom play next year. He already have 2 full pro season. He play over 20 minutes night after night and he is doing great. He is a elite skater with good offensive instincts and have been working real hard on is defensive game. Pretty sure he will make the team next season.


    He has a contract in Sweden for next season, so he will likely be sent there again next year.
    6 déc. 2023 à 18 h 5
    #14
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2022
    Messages: 1,756
    Mentions "j'aime": 694
    Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
    He has a contract in Sweden for next season, so he will likely be sent there again next year.


    I would be shock ig he make the team. He was one of the best at rookie camp, he is much closer then people think. I guess it will depend on how many NHL contract defenseman we got next year. Their at least Guhle, Barron and Matheson who have the edge over the rest. Savard will also be their if he isn’t traded.
    6 déc. 2023 à 19 h 16
    #15
    Prime Primeau
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2023
    Messages: 5,470
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,173
    Quoting: Joblow
    I would be shock ig he make the team. He was one of the best at rookie camp, he is much closer then people think. I guess it will depend on how many NHL contract defenseman we got next year. Their at least Guhle, Barron and Matheson who have the edge over the rest. Savard will also be their if he isn’t traded.


    Harris will be waiver eligible so he will be there. Xhekaj and Struble will be there too. Kova is another lock. Hutson and Reinbacher should be pushing. That leave no place for Engstrom
    6 déc. 2023 à 19 h 41
    #16
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2022
    Messages: 1,756
    Mentions "j'aime": 694
    Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
    Harris will be waiver eligible so he will be there. Xhekaj and Struble will be there too. Kova is another lock. Hutson and Reinbacher should be pushing. That leave no place for Engstrom


    I don’t think Harris will be longer with the team. I expect Mtl to trade him at the draft. Depending on The trade deadline Kovacevic might not be there either. If Engstrom is better then the other then they would found room for him. Struble have been good so far we’ll see if he can maintain.
    6 déc. 2023 à 21 h 27
    #17
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2023
    Messages: 1,400
    Mentions "j'aime": 525
    Quoting: Joblow
    Barron is already a top 4 d-man end of discussion. He play top four minutes at 22 years old. He don’t look out of play in that role. Kid’s doesn’t even have a 100 games under is belt. If he continues to progress like he did since last year, there no concern about. You clearly don’t like him but i am not sure why? Kovacevic is not better and there a big reason why Barron have surpassed him in the d-men hierarchy. If Barron wasn’t good he would be playing Struble, Kovacevic, Lindstrom the big minutes he give to Barron. I guess Martin St louis see the thing like i see them.
    Bref tu aimes pas Barron ta le droit mais t’es mieuxde t’habituer parce qu’il va être a Montreal longtemps surtout si il continue à améliorer son jeu défensif et ca prise de décision avec la rondelle.


    Jamais dis que je n’aimais pas Barron. Tu n’as aucun hockey knowledge, t’es juste un fafan. C’est lourd les gens comme toi, il y en a partout, c’est la majorité. Victor Mete paraissait bien au côté de Shea Weber et jouais sur le première paire. Et non, il n’était pas un défenseur top 4. Barron n’est pas un défenseur top 4 parce qu’il joue 22 min, on n’a juste personne. Barron est mauvais avec tout le monde sauf Guhle & Matheson qui le carry. Donc pas le choix de le mettre sur ton top 4. Barron n’est pas bon en récupération de rondelle, il joue avec comme si c’était une patate chaude. Il a de la misère à gagner ses batailles un contre un, n’est pas bon en PK et fait pas grand chose sur le PP à pointe. Est-ce qu’il a le potentiel de devenir un défenseur top 4 ? Bien sur que oui, il n’est juste pas encore rendu là dans son développement. Kovacevic best partner was Jordan Harris and they were a solid pairing, now with Struble (a rookie) with the team, the only ‘vet’ left on the right side is Kovacevic. That’s why Gustav Lindstrom (one of the worse dman in the league) is paired up with Mike Matheson so Matheson can carry him (tho Matheson hasn’t even been good defensively this year). Engstrom is coming over in North America tho. MTL dman lock next season : Mike Matheson (1), David Savard (2), Kaiden Guhle (3), Jonathan Kovacevic (4), Jordan Harris (5), Justin Barron (6), and probably Arber Xhekaj (7). Laval should be : Hutson (1), Reinbacher (2), Struble (3), Mailloux (4), Trudeau (5), Engstrom (6) and maybe Tourigny (7). Je viens de réaliser j’ai switcher du français à l’anglais 😅 Oui c’est possible qu’ils échangent Jordan Harris et/ou Kovacevic, mais avec toutes les blessures qu’ils ont à chaque années, il préfère garder leur profondeur
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage