Quoting: KingofRnR
I like the facts to be accurate
Not sure what you do for a living, but obviously you don't know how negotiations work or that there's an element of bluffing and poker involved
Yes, once Sutter was fired, they were no longer wanting or in a rush to get out of town. They've all been presented offers to consider
I read that Tanev was upset and left VAN with a sour taste in his mouth, but I never saw him say he'd love to be back in VAN... I think that's the case, but he hasn't said it
The fact is, you don't know the facts and can't seem to keep them straight even though you found the resources for (which I applaud you for, since most people are too lazy)
Flames won't rebuild, they will re-tool. Be happy that VAN is playing well right now, but whether they can maintain this current play, is still up for question, especially after losing to the Sharks. Flames have improved and are on the rise
We know what we're doing here in Calgary. Go clean up the streets of Vancouver before you worry your pretty little head about what happening in C-Town
Buddy, I've provided you source after source from trusted NHL insiders on your players wanting out of Calgary if the season continues on its current trajectory. You have provided 0 evidence to back up your statements. These are facts, hard evidence, that your players want out so badly it is reaching the most respected insiders in the league - LeBrun, Friedman, etc. Guys who don't talk out of their ass for clicks.
So you want facts to be accurate? Stop talking out of your ass and link an article or a post from a trusted NHL insider. Provide some facts.
You say the Flames have improved and are on the rise? I suppose one man's trash is another man's treasure because a .477 points % doesn't seem like an improvement or rise, to me.