SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Any Interest Sharks Fans

Créé par: KingofRnR
Équipe: 2023-24 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 21 nov. 2023
Publié: 21 nov. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Trade Moves to Make Right Now
Transactions
1.
2.
3.
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2025
Logo de FLA
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2026
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $76 189 166 $0 $212 500 $7 310 834 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
825 000 $825 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $762 500 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $762 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
21 nov. 2023 à 19 h 35
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,593
Mentions "j'aime": 19,714
Flames aren't making any bandaid trades
21 nov. 2023 à 19 h 35
#2
go Sharks go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 866
Mentions "j'aime": 399
first one yes, don’t think Kunin is that good. Great for 4th line/bottom 6 cause he’s a team player and physical, but not a lot of skill and takes bad penalties. I think Dube has higher upside and the same floor.
2nd one probably, I think sharangovich/Duclair are similarly good players, but the term on Sharangovich is better.
3rd one no, Vladar just hasn’t been good. Kahk was bad last year but that was the only one, was good before, and is playing well now. (Maybe not by stats, but sharks are bad, like Blackwood has been insane but is only at an even .900)
Kinger25 a aimé ceci.
21 nov. 2023 à 20 h 59
#3
Démarrer sujet
TrevorA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 6,839
Mentions "j'aime": 1,856
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Flames aren't making any bandaid trades

I really don’t see the difference tbh. Neither Dube, Sharangovich, Kahkonen or Vladar are going to net much in return, but perhaps a change of scenery leads them to better results thus increasing all of their Trade Values

We could definitely use Duclair more than Dube or Sharangovich, who plays with no jam and appears to be the most skilled and dangerous when only the opponents goalie is on the ice…

At least Kunin’s an RFA and has some Jam to his game
21 nov. 2023 à 21 h 2
#4
Démarrer sujet
TrevorA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 6,839
Mentions "j'aime": 1,856
Quoting: SJSGM
first one yes, don’t think Kunin is that good. Great for 4th line/bottom 6 cause he’s a team player and physical, but not a lot of skill and takes bad penalties. I think Dube has higher upside and the same floor.
2nd one probably, I think sharangovich/Duclair are similarly good players, but the term on Sharangovich is better.
3rd one no, Vladar just hasn’t been good. Kahk was bad last year but that was the only one, was good before, and is playing well now. (Maybe not by stats, but sharks are bad, like Blackwood has been insane but is only at an even .900)

This is the write up on Kunin on Elite-Prospects:

A highly intelligent and offensively gifted forward. Has a keen eye for scoring opportunities and has shown flashes of elite-level finishing capability. Works hard and isn't afraid to battle for puck possession. Good hands and puck skills, and has a really accurate release on his shot. Needs to work on his explosiveness, staying in motion with the play, and strength behind his shot. All-in-all, a gifted offensive force with the potential to blossom into a highlight reel player. (Curtis Joe, EP 2015)

Did they accidentally put this in his bio or what’s the deal!?
21 nov. 2023 à 21 h 10
#5
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 12,044
Mentions "j'aime": 3,190
Doubt conway moves yegor for duclair after selling toffoli for him. Ugly look PR wise
21 nov. 2023 à 21 h 19
#6
Démarrer sujet
TrevorA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 6,839
Mentions "j'aime": 1,856
Quoting: dgibb10
Doubt conway moves yegor for duclair after selling toffoli for him. Ugly look PR wise

Feel free to explain your POV, but I don’t see any bad PR moving Sharanhovich, who was expected to step in to a Top-6 role but hasn’t, for a guy familiar with and previously successful with Huberdeau
21 nov. 2023 à 22 h 14
#7
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 12,044
Mentions "j'aime": 3,190
Quoting: KingofRnR
Feel free to explain your POV, but I don’t see any bad PR moving Sharanhovich, who was expected to step in to a Top-6 role but hasn’t, for a guy familiar with and previously successful with Huberdeau


Just a few months ago duclair was traded for a 5th and a depth goalie (who I expect to hit waivers at some point)
and toffoli was traded for Yegor and a 3rd

With toffoli being as good as he has been, moving on that quickly for a worse rental, one who could have been had quite cheaply during the offseason, is an ugly look for a GM.
21 nov. 2023 à 22 h 26
#8
Démarrer sujet
TrevorA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 6,839
Mentions "j'aime": 1,856
Quoting: dgibb10
Just a few months ago duclair was traded for a 5th and a depth goalie (who I expect to hit waivers at some point)
and toffoli was traded for Yegor and a 3rd

With toffoli being as good as he has been, moving on that quickly for a worse rental, one who could have been had quite cheaply during the offseason, is an ugly look for a GM.

I hear where you’re coming from, but Toffoli was given away for under market value based on Conroy being high on Sharangovich and it hasn’t worked out so far. Yeah it’s pretty early to give up on him, but this is also about reuniting Huberdeau with a much Faster, Grittier forward with far better past success, so if anything it helps us get a better return than we did for Toffoli, we just need to extend Duclair for cheap IF he fits in, otherwise we flip him again at the TDL

And Duclair was worth more, but got dumped for Cap Reasons. CGY paid a 1st in the off-season to dump Monahan. It’s not easy moving guys at that time and player values/returns are far lower when Free Agents are available at no acquisition cost

Its just business, but yeah gotta be careful and think about how it looks on you as a GM and organization, I get that
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage