SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

The only deadline move I can think about now

Créé par: JesikaMorris
Équipe: 2023-24 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 28 oct. 2023
Publié: 29 oct. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Now I do think this is an overpayment cause klingberg can easily be flipped for more assets and it’s only 1M retained instead of 50% but it’s all the leafs need and makes it more likely the flames can do this trade without having to do any other trades they only add 650k to their salary which they do have
Transactions
TOR
  1. Tanev, Christopher (1 000 000 $ retained)
CGY
  1. Klingberg, John
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de NYI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de VAN
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2026
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2183 500 000 $79 597 283 $0 $0 $3 902 717 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Flames de Calgary
125 000 $125 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
766 667 $766 667 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 550 000 $3 550 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
29 oct. 2023 à 8 h 32
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 7,939
Mentions "j'aime": 3,327
The late 1st is a start but Calgary doesn't want Klingberg. Replace him with Liljegren make it 50% retention on Tanev and you probably have a deal.
29 oct. 2023 à 8 h 46
#2
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2023
Messages: 603
Mentions "j'aime": 155
Quoting: MoxNix
The late 1st is a start but Calgary doesn't want Klingberg. Replace him with Liljegren make it 50% retention on Tanev and you probably have a deal.


Tanev has no where near the value to get lily no sorry this is an overpayment this will do
jaok3 et Newgod77 a aimé ceci.
29 oct. 2023 à 9 h 33
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 7,939
Mentions "j'aime": 3,327
Quoting: JesikaMorris
Tanev has no where near the value to get lily no sorry this is an overpayment this will do


Leafs fans 0.o
29 oct. 2023 à 12 h 10
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 7,939
Mentions "j'aime": 3,327
Quoting: JesikaMorris
Several likes on my comment none on yours I think you’re out numbered here my guy


You can't count either, several is more than a few which is more than the 2 likes your comment got. That's not even taking into account how many Toronto fans there are. There are probably more Leafs "fans" who couldn't name more than a few of their own players far less name anyone on another team than most teams have in total number of fans.
29 oct. 2023 à 14 h 33
#5
TrevorA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 6,876
Mentions "j'aime": 1,874
Modifié 29 oct. 2023 à 14 h 47
Liljegren for Tanev 50% retained is probably enough (maybe add Former Coronato Harvard Teammate Abruzzese), but a Late TOR 1st alone isn’t and I don’t think we want anything to do with Klingberg, including taking on the additional task of moving him for another asset

Are we very high on Topi Niemela @MoxNix!? Or what other Player/Prospect in addition to the 1st might work!?

I don’t mind Jarnkrok as a Bottom-6 Player. He’d be almost 1/2 the cost as Dube come next year and he’s just as good. I see us moving on from Dube to make space for Pelletier, Zary and/or Honzek next season anyways
MoxNix a aimé ceci.
29 oct. 2023 à 14 h 51
#6
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2023
Messages: 603
Mentions "j'aime": 155
Quoting: KingofRnR
Liljegren for Tanev 50% retained is probably enough (maybe add Former Coronato Harvard Teammate Abruzzese), but a Late TOR 1st alone isn’t and I don’t think we want anything to do with Klingberg, including taking on the additional task of moving him for another asset

Are we very high on Topi Niemela MoxNix!? Or what other Player/Prospect in addition to the 1st might work!?

I don’t mind Jarnkrok as a Bottom-6 Player. He’d be almost 1/2 the cost as Dube come next year and he’s just as good. I see us moving on from Dube to make space for Pelletier, Zary and/or Honzek next season anyways


Man lily for tanev boat never set sail never was booked to set sail because it would never happen it makes zero sense for the leafs when lily is probably better next year
29 oct. 2023 à 14 h 54
#7
TrevorA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 6,876
Mentions "j'aime": 1,874
Quoting: JesikaMorris
Man lily for tanev boat never set sail never was booked to set sail because it would never happen it makes zero sense for the leafs when lily is probably better next year

I know your feelings on the matter, but how soon Liljegren eclipses Tanev is arguable & debatable. Like I’ve always said do you want/need the better player now or some day in the future…
MoxNix a aimé ceci.
29 oct. 2023 à 15 h 49
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 7,939
Mentions "j'aime": 3,327
Modifié 29 oct. 2023 à 16 h 4
Quoting: KingofRnR
Liljegren for Tanev 50% retained is probably enough (maybe add Former Coronato Harvard Teammate Abruzzese), but a Late TOR 1st alone isn’t and I don’t think we want anything to do with Klingberg, including taking on the additional task of moving him for another asset

Are we very high on Topi Niemela MoxNix!? Or what other Player/Prospect in addition to the 1st might work!?

I don’t mind Jarnkrok as a Bottom-6 Player. He’d be almost 1/2 the cost as Dube come next year and he’s just as good. I see us moving on from Dube to make space for Pelletier, Zary and/or Honzek next season anyways


A late (likely very late) 1st definitely isn't enough for Tanev especially not at 50% retained. Lilly probably isn't enough by himself either though Lillly and a 2nd might be close. Before Toronto fans suggest it no Brodie and/or Robertson + a late first doesn't cut it either. Timmins + a late 1st might be close too.

No interest in Niemela. None whatsoever.

Jarnkrok isn't bad but he's not what the Flames need. He's on the wrong side of 30 with 3 years on his contract (counting this year) and had no chemistry with anyone in Calgary when he was here. Besides I'm starting to wonder if part of the problem could be too many Swedes. Swedes in general are skilled players with decent size but the vast majority of them aren't exactly the grittiest or most competitive players around. I doubt Dube gets much more than about 3 mil per on his next contract. I'd rather keep Dube than trade him for Jarnkrok. But yeah we should be moving on from Dube with all the young left shot forwards coming up. Dube could use a change of scenery too.

As Don used to put it "Chicken Swedes"... Always followed by profuse apologies to Ulf Samuelsson.

On the other hand Jarnkrok for Kadri anyone? :P
KingofRnR a aimé ceci.
29 oct. 2023 à 16 h 35
#9
TrevorA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 6,876
Mentions "j'aime": 1,874
Quoting: MoxNix
A late (likely very late) 1st definitely isn't enough for Tanev especially not at 50% retained. Lilly probably isn't enough by himself either though Lillly and a 2nd might be close. Before Toronto fans suggest it no Brodie and/or Robertson + a late first doesn't cut it either. Timmins + a late 1st might be close too.

No interest in Niemela. None whatsoever.

Jarnkrok isn't bad but he's not what the Flames need. He's on the wrong side of 30 with 3 years on his contract (counting this year) and had no chemistry with anyone in Calgary when he was here. Besides I'm starting to wonder if part of the problem could be too many Swedes. Swedes in general are skilled players with decent size but the vast majority of them aren't exactly the grittiest or most competitive players around. I doubt Dube gets much more than about 3 mil per on his next contract. I'd rather keep Dube than trade him for Jarnkrok. But yeah we should be moving on from Dube with all the young left shot forwards coming up. Dube could use a change of scenery too.

As Don used to put it "Chicken Swedes"... Always followed by profuse apologies to Ulf Samuelsson.

On the other hand Jarnkrok for Kadri anyone? :P

No, we would Trade Dube elsewhere, Jarnkrok would just be a cheap replacement. He’s a Right Shot and Better both at Playing Centre and Defensively, but nowhere near the Hustle, Energy or Tenacity Dube brings. He’d be a fine 3LW/4C. Anything that happened while Sutter was there doesn’t mean too much to me, meaning I’m sure Jarnkrok would be better in CGY this time around

Is Timmins any good though!? He’s injury prone too, no!?
29 oct. 2023 à 17 h 13
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 7,939
Mentions "j'aime": 3,327
Modifié 29 oct. 2023 à 17 h 28
Quoting: KingofRnR
No, we would Trade Dube elsewhere, Jarnkrok would just be a cheap replacement. He’s a Right Shot and Better both at Playing Centre and Defensively, but nowhere near the Hustle, Energy or Tenacity Dube brings. He’d be a fine 3LW/4C. Anything that happened while Sutter was there doesn’t mean too much to me, meaning I’m sure Jarnkrok would be better in CGY this time around

Is Timmins any good though!? He’s injury prone too, no!?


Jarnkrok would be better without Sutter... Sure just like Huberdeau and Kadri. They've been so much better now that Sutter is gone right? For at least 10 years now the team has been like this through multiple coaches. The problem isn't coaching it's the culture where mediocrity not only acceptable it's worthy of a long extension with a nice raise as long as a player is "a nice guy". Making Backlund captain pretty much assures they'll continue having the same old problems. Who will they blame next the coach again, or the goalies? I'm guessing they'll blame the coach 2 years in a row for a change since Markstrom's wild inconsistency and propensity for letting in terrible goals at the worst times actually is a huge problem.

Timmons I'm not sure about. That's why I said it *might be close. The Leafs never have enough money left over for a good D corps and expect too much from 3rd pairing players. They did it with Justin Holl for years now it's Timmons turn to be the whipping boy on defense.
29 oct. 2023 à 17 h 24
#11
TrevorA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 6,876
Mentions "j'aime": 1,874
Quoting: MoxNix
Jarnkrok would be better without Sutter... Sure he will just like Huberdeau and Kadri have been right?

Timmons I'm not sure about. That's why I said it *might be close.

Janrkrok was contributing 0.50PPG+ pre and post CGY/Sutter, so it’s not a stretch to believe he could do the same in Calgary a 2nd time around

$2.1mil isn’t terrible for what he can do, I was just thinking it would help keep Lindholm and the other Swede’s happy, but your point in general about them not wanting to get involved with the Dirty and Physical parts of the game isn’t wrong

Huberdeau & Kadri are having their own issues and clearly Sutter wasn’t/isn’t the reason. That said, they weren’t the only guys that wanted Sutter gone obviously, so it’s just a different time and opportunity is more of what I was saying

Dube will probably get more like $3.5-4mil+. He’s doing better than Sharangovich is so far
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage